Skip to main content

A Useful Tool to Support the Ontology Alignment Repair

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 886 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12320))

Abstract

Ontologies are used in Information Systems to manage and share knowledge pertaining to different domains, considering it is common that one particular piece of knowledge is modeled individually into different ontologies. Alignment processes are carried out towards interoperability; however, the results are not effective in most cases, requiring manual repair and review by domain experts. Thus, this work introduces a repair and review tool for the alignment of ontologies with the goal of assisting experts in the alignment repair tasks. Using the technology acceptance model, a proof of concept was made to analyze the perception by domain experts regarding the tool’s usefulness, ease, and intention of use. From statistical analyses in terms of reliability, default path, inference, and correlation, it has been found that study participants had a positive perception of the tool’s usefulness and ease in the tasks of ontology alignment repair. Therefore, the tool and its functionalities proved to be useful towards assisting domain experts in their tasks of reducing the semantic heterogeneity among ontologies pertaining to the same domain through alignment repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/spot/oxo/search.

  2. 2.

    https://www.alliancegenome.org/.

  3. 3.

    https://monarchinitiative.org.

  4. 4.

    Questionnaire and Data available at https://bit.ly/RAOSys-TAMData.

References

  1. Nguyen, A., Gardner, L., Sheridan, D.: Towards ontology-based design science research for knowledge accumulation and evolution. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(1), 158–176 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harrow, I., et al.: Ontology mapping for semantically enabled applications. Drug Discovery Today 24, 2068–2075 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banouar, O., Raghay, S.: Interoperability of information systems through ontologies: state of art. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 14(8), 392 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Silva, J., Baiao, F.A., Revoredo, K.: Alinhamento interativo de ontologias usando anti-padroes de alinhamento: um primeiro experimento. In: Anais do XII Simposio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação, pp. 208–215 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Euzenat, J.: First experiments in cultural alignment repair. In: Presutti, V., Blomqvist, E., Troncy, R., Sack, H., Papadakis, I., Tordai, A. (eds.) ESWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8798, pp. 115–130. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11955-7_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, H., et al.: User validation in ontology alignment: functional assessment and impact. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 34, e15 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheatham, M., Hitzler, P.: String similarity metrics for ontology alignment. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8219, pp. 294–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41338-4_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Duan, S., Fokoue, A., Srinivas, K.: One size does not fit all: customizing ontology alignment using user feedback. In: Patel-Schneider, P.F., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6496, pp. 177–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17746-0_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Meilicke, C.: Alignment incoherence in ontology matching. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Mannheim (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faria, D., et al.: The agreement makerlight ontology matching system. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8185, pp. 527–541. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41030-7_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Massmann, S., Raunich, S., Aumuller, D., Arnold, P., Rahm, E.: Evolution of the COMA match system. In: International Conference on Ontology Matching, vol. 814, pp. 49–60 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3), 319 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gargouri, F., Jaziri, W.: Ontology Theory, Management, and Design: Advanced Tools and Models. Information Science Reference (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, Y., Stroe, C., Cruz, I.F.: Interactive visualization of large ontology matching results. In: VOILA@ ISWC, p. 37 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pesquita, C., Faria, D., Santos, E., Couto, F.M.: To repair or not to repair: reconciling correctness and coherence in ontology reference alignments. In: Proceedings of the ISWC Ontology Matching Workshop (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Falconer, S.M., Noy, N.F., Storey, M.A.D.: Ontology mapping-a user survey. In: OM. Citeseer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Granitzer, M., Sabol, V., Onn, K.W., Lukose, D., Tochtermann, K.: Ontology alignment - a survey with focus on visually supported semi-automatic techniques. Future Internet 2(3), 238–258 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sensinum: what is proof of concept in software development? Likely something else than you think (2010). https://sensinum.com/proof-of-concept-in-software-development/. Accessed 14 May 2020

  20. Basili, V.R.: Software modeling and measurement: the Goal/Question/Metric paradigm (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nielsen, J.: Why you need to test with 5 users. In: Nielsen Norman Group: Evidence-Based User Experience Research, Training, and Consulting (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gasparin, M., Isabela, H.M., Cristine, S.C.: Psychometric properties of the international outcome inventory for hearing AIDS. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 76(1), 85–90 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. George, D., Mallery, M.: IBM SPSS Statistics 19 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 12th edn. Pearson, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parasuraman, A.P., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retail. 64(1), 12–40 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dragisic, Z., Ivanova, V., Li, H., Lambrix, P.: Experiences from the anatomy track in the ontology alignment evaluation initiative. J. Biomed. Seman. 8(1), 56 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Miriam Oliveira dos Santos , Carlos Eduardo Ribeiro de Mello or Tadeu Moreira de Classe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

dos Santos, M.O., de Mello, C.E.R., de Classe, T.M. (2020). A Useful Tool to Support the Ontology Alignment Repair. In: Cerri, R., Prati, R.C. (eds) Intelligent Systems. BRACIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61380-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61380-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61379-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61380-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics