Abstract
Multiparametric imaging in cancer has been shown to be useful for tumor detection and may also depict functional tumor characteristics relevant for clinical phenotypes. However, when confronted with datasets consisting of multiple values per voxel, traditional reading of the imaging series fails to capture complicated patterns. These patterns of potentially important imaging properties of the parameter space may be critical for the analysis, but standard approaches do not deliver sufficient details. Therefore, in this paper, we present an approach that aims to enable the exploration and analysis of such multiparametric studies using an interactive visual analysis application to remedy the trade-offs between details in the value domain and in spatial resolution. This may aid in the discrimination between healthy and cancerous tissue and potentially highlight metastases that evolved from the primary tumor. We conducted an evaluation with eleven domain experts from different fields of research to confirm the utility of our approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009)
Berg, A., et al.: Tissue and imaging biomarkers for hypoxia predict poor outcome in endometrial cancer. Oncotarget 7(43), 69844–69856 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12004
Brooke, J.: SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P., Thomas, B., McClelland, I., Weerdmeester, B. (eds.) Usability Evaluation In Industry, pp. 266–290. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)
Bruckner, S., et al.: BrainGazer - visual queries for neurobiology research. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics 15, 1497–504 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.121
Clark, K., et al.: The cancer imaging archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J. Digit. Imaging 26(6), 1045–1057 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7
Fasmer, K.E., et al.: Preoperative quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging predict aggressive disease in endometrial cancer. Acta Radiol. 59(8), 1010–1017 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185117740932
Friendly, M.: A.-M. Guerry’s Moral Statistics of France: challenges for multivariable spatial analysis. Stat. Sci. 22(3), 368–399 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1214/07-STS241
Gleicher, M., Albers, D., Walker, R., Jusufi, I., Hansen, C.D., Roberts, J.C.: Visual comparison for information visualization. Inf. Vis. 10(4), 289–309 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611416549
Haldorsen, I.S., et al.: Increased microvascular proliferation is negatively correlated to tumour blood flow and is associated with unfavourable outcome in endometrial carcinomas. Br. J. Cancer 110(1), 107–114 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.694
Haldorsen, I.S., et al.: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in endometrial carcinoma identifies patients at increased risk of recurrence. Eur. Radiol. 23(10), 2916–2925 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2901-3
Haldorsen, I.S., Salvesen, H.B.: What is the best preoperative imaging for endometrial cancer? Curr. Oncol. Rep. 18(4), 25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-016-0506-0
Jäckle, D., Fuchs, J., Keim, D.A.: Star glyph insets for overview preservation of multivariate data. In: IS and T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging Science and Technology, pp. 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2016.1.vda-506
Jönsson, D., et al.: A visual environment for hypothesis formation and reasoning in studies with fMRI and multivariate clinical data. In: KozlÃková, B., Linsen, L., Vázquez, P.P., Lawonn, K., Raidou, R.G. (eds.) Eurographics Workshop on Visual Computing for Biology and Medicine. The Eurographics Association (2019). https://doi.org/10.2312/vcbm.20191232
Klein, S., Staring, M., Murphy, K., Viergever, M.A., Pluim, J.P.W.: Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(1), 196–205 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616
Klippel, A., Hardisty, F., Weaver, C.: Star plots: how shape characteristics influence classification tasks. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 36(2), 149–163 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1559/152304009788188808
Lawonn, K., Smit, N., Bühler, K., Preim, B.: A survey on multimodal medical data visualization. Comput. Graph. Forum 37(1), 413–438 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13306
Malik, M.M., Heinzl, C., Gröller, M.E.: Comparative visualization for parameter studies of dataset series. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics 16(5), 829–840 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.20
Mlejnek, M., et al.: Profile flags: a novel metaphor for probing of t2 maps. In: Silva, C.T., Gröller, E., Rushmeier, H. (eds.) Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2005, pp. 599–606. IEEE CS, October 2005
Munzner, T.: A nested model for visualization design and validation. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 15(6), 921–928 (2009)
Opach, T., Popelka, S., Dolezalova, J., Rød, J.K.: Star and polyline glyphs in a grid plot and on a map display: which perform better? Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 45(5), 400–419 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2017.1364169
Peng, W., Ward, M.O., Rundensteiner, E.A.: Clutter reduction in multi-dimensional data visualization using dimension reordering. In: Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, INFO VIS, pp. 89–96 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2004.15
Ropinski, T., Oeltze, S., Preim, B.: Visual computing in biology and medicine: survey of glyph-based visualization techniques for spatial multivariate medical data. Comput. Graph. 35(2), 392–401 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2011.01.011
Schmainda, K., Prah, M.: Data from brain-tumor-progression (2018). https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2018.15quzvnb
Smit, N.N., Kraima, A.C., Jansma, D., Ruiter, M.C.d., Botha, C.P.: A unified representation for the model-based visualization of heterogeneous anatomy data. In: Meyer, M., Weinkaufs, T. (eds.) EuroVis - Short Papers. The Eurographics Association (2012). https://doi.org/10.2312/PE/EuroVisShort/EuroVisShort2012/085-089
Smit, N.N., Haneveld, B.K., Staring, M., Eisemann, E., Botha, C.P., Vilanova, A.: RegistrationShop: an interactive 3D medical volume registration system. In: Viola, I., Buehler, K., Ropinski, T. (eds.) Eurographics Workshop on Visual Computing for Biology and Medicine. The Eurographics Association (2014). https://doi.org/10.2312/vcbm.20141193
Stoppel, S., Hodneland, E., Hauser, H., Bruckner, S.: Graxels: information rich primitives for the visualization of time-dependent spatial data. In: Eurographics Workshop on Visual Computing for Biology and Medicine, pp. 183–192, September 2016. https://doi.org/10.2312/vcbm.20161286
Wickham, H., Hofmann, H., Wickham, C., Cook, D.: Glyph-maps for visually exploring temporal patterns in climate data and models. Environmetrics 23(5), 382–393 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mörth, E., Haldorsen, I.S., Bruckner, S., Smit, N.N. (2020). ParaGlyder: Probe-driven Interactive Visual Analysis for Multiparametric Medical Imaging Data. In: Magnenat-Thalmann, N., et al. Advances in Computer Graphics. CGI 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61864-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61864-3_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61863-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61864-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)