Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering

WISE 2020: Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2020 pp 155–166Cite as

Automatic Complex Word Identification Using Implicit Feedback from User Copy Operations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12343))

Abstract

Complex Word Identification (CWI) is one of the key components of lexical text simplification. This paper proposes a new approach to CWI on websites, based on tracking what web users copy to their clipboards. Users may copy to the clipboard words that they are not familiar with or that make the text difficult to understand, in order to search for more information on the internet. Accordingly, this study examines the hypothesis that word copying on a website is an indicator of word complexity. Copied words on a sample website are compared to uncopied words using three simple word complexity indicators: number of syllables, number of characters, and general word frequency. The results show that copied words are more likely to be evaluated as complex than uncopied words and words that are copied more frequently are more likely to be evaluated as complex than words that are copied less frequently, by all three indicators. Consequently, word copying on a website can be considered a novel CWI indicator. Unlike traditional CWI indicators, which are based on static word features, this new indicator provides a different approach by targeting complex words based on dynamic user behavior. Therefore, simplifying these complex words might be particularly helpful to the readers. Further work should evaluate using this word copying indicator in complete CWI and text simplification implementations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/wfreitag/syllable-counter-java.

References

  1. Bingel, J., Barrett, M., Klerke, S.: Predicting misreadings from gaze in children with reading difficulties. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, pp. 24–34. Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans, June 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-0503, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W18-0503

  2. Coleman, M., Liau, T.L.: A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. J. Appl. Psychol. 60, 283–284 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilliam Haije, E.: Are session recording tools a risk to internet privacy, March 2018. https://mopinion.com/are-session-recording-tools-a-risk-to-internet-privacy/

  4. Gooding, S., Kochmar, E.: Complex word identification as a sequence labelling task. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1148–1153. Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, July 2019. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1109, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1109

  5. Gunning, R.: The Technique of Clear Writing. McGraw-Hill, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horn, C., Manduca, C., Kauchak, D.: Learning a lexical simplifier using Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 2, pp. 458–463. Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, June 2014. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-2075, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P14-2075

  7. Kirsh, I.: Using mouse movement heatmaps to visualize user attention to words. In: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI 2020), Tallinn, Estonia, forthcoming. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, October 2020

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kirsh, I.: What web users copy to the clipboard on a website: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2020), forthcoming. INSTICC, SciTePress, Setúbal, November 2020

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kirsh, I., Joy, M.: An HCI approach to extractive text summarization: selecting key sentences based on user copy operations. In: Proceedings of the 22nd HCI International Conference (HCII 2020), Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer, Cham, July 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60700-5_43

  10. Kirsh, I., Joy, M.: Splitting the web analytics atom: from page metrics and KPIs to sub-page metrics and KPIs. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS 2020), Biarritz, France, pp. 33–43. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, June 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405962.3405984

  11. Leroy, G., Kauchak, D.: The effect of word familiarity on actual and perceived text difficulty. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. JAMIA 21, 169–172 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McLaughlin, G.H.: SMOG grading: a new readability formula. J. Read. 12, 639–646 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norvig, P.: Natural language corpus data. In: Segaran, T., Hammerbacher, J. (eds.) Beautiful Data, pp. 219–242. O’Reilly Media, Inc., USA (2009). https://norvig.com/ngrams/

  14. Paetzold, G., Specia, L.: Benchmarking lexical simplification systems. In: Chair, N.C.C., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Paris, May 2016

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paetzold, G., Specia, L.: SemEval 2016 task 11: complex word identification. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016), pp. 560–569. Association for Computational Linguistics, San Diego, June 2016. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S16-1085, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/S16-1085

  16. Shardlow, M.: A comparison of techniques to automatically identify complex words. In: 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop, pp. 103–109. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, August 2013. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P13-3015

  17. Shardlow, M.: A survey of automated text simplification. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (IJACSA) Spec. Issue Nat. Lang. Process. 4(1) (2014). https://doi.org/10.14569/SpecialIssue.2014.040109

  18. Specia, L., Jauhar, S.K., Mihalcea, R.: Semeval-2012 task 1: English lexical simplification. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, SemEval 2012, pp. 347–355. Association for Computational Linguistics, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stajner, S., Saggion, H., Ponzetto, S.: Improving lexical coverage of text simplification systems for Spanish. Expert Syst. Appl. 118, 80–91 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Swain, D., Tambe, M., Ballal, P., Dolase, V., Agrawal, K., Rajmane, Y.: Lexical text simplification using WordNet. In: Singh, M., Gupta, P.K., Tyagi, V., Flusser, J., Ören, T., Kashyap, R. (eds.) ICACDS 2019. CCIS, vol. 1046, pp. 114–122. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9942-8_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Yimam, S.M., et al.: A report on the complex word identification shared task 2018. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, pp. 66–78. Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans, June 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-0507, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W18-0507

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Ilan Kirsh

Authors
  1. Ilan Kirsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilan Kirsh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Zhisheng Huang

  2. VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Wouter Beek

  3. Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Hua Wang

  4. Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia

    Rui Zhou

  5. Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Yanchun Zhang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kirsh, I. (2020). Automatic Complex Word Identification Using Implicit Feedback from User Copy Operations. In: Huang, Z., Beek, W., Wang, H., Zhou, R., Zhang, Y. (eds) Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2020. WISE 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12343. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62008-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62008-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62007-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62008-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation