Skip to main content

Toward OWL Restriction Reconciliation in Merging Knowledge

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12124))

Abstract

Merging ontologies is the standard way to achieve interoperability of heterogeneous systems in the Semantic Web. Because of the possibility of different modeling, OWL restrictions from one ontology may not necessarily be compatible with those from other ontologies. Thus, the merged ontology can suffer from restriction conflicts. This problem so far has got little attention. We propose a workflow to detect and resolve the OWL restriction conflicts within the merged ontology. We reconcile “one type” conflicts by building a subsumption hierarchy. We tackle cardinality restriction conflicts with least upper and greatest lower bound methods. By utilizing the semantic relatedness between two classes, we overcome value restriction conflicts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The one type conflict can happen only on datatype properties.

  2. 2.

    We assumed the OWL/RDF data types could be mapped to Java data types and considered the general data types conversions from: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-5.html#jls-5.5.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/fusion-jena/CoMerger/blob/master/Restriction/solution.md.

  4. 4.

    http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/2019/conference/index.html.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/fusion-jena/CoMerger/blob/master/Restriction/caseStudy.md.

References

  1. Pottinger, R.A., Bernstein, P.A.: Merging models based on given correspondences. In: VLDB, pp. 862–873 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Babalou, S., König-Ries, B.: GMRs: reconciliation of generic merge requirements in ontology integration. In: SEMANTICS Poster and Demos (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sonsilphong, S., Arch-int, N., Arch-int, S., Pattarapongsin, C.: A semantic interoperability approach to health-care data: resolving data-level conflicts. Expert. Syst. 33(6), 531–547 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Batista, M.d.C.M., Salgado, A.C.: Information quality measurement in data integration schemas. In: QDB, pp. 61–72 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fahad, M.: Merging of axiomatic definitions of concepts in the complex owl ontologies. Artif. Intell. Rev. 47(2), 181–215 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buneman, P., Davidson, S., Kosky, A.: Theoretical aspects of schema merging. In: Pirotte, A., Delobel, C., Gottlob, G. (eds.) EDBT 1992. LNCS, vol. 580, pp. 152–167. Springer, Heidelberg (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0032429

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Zamazal, O., Svátek, V.: The ten-year ontofarm and its fertilization within the onto-sphere. J. Web Semant. 43, 46–53 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

S. Babalou is supported by a scholarship from German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Grygorova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Grygorova, E., Babalou, S., König-Ries, B. (2020). Toward OWL Restriction Reconciliation in Merging Knowledge. In: Harth, A., et al. The Semantic Web: ESWC 2020 Satellite Events. ESWC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12124. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62327-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62327-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62326-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62327-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics