Skip to main content

An Improved Sensor Pattern Noise Estimation Method Based on Edge Guided Weighted Averaging

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning for Cyber Security (ML4CS 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 12487))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Sensor Pattern Noise (SPN) has proven to be an effective fingerprint for source camera identification. However, its estimation accuracy is still greatly affected by image contents. In this work, considering the confidence difference in varying image regions, an image edge guided weighted averaging scheme for robust SPN estimation is proposed. Firstly, the edge and non-edge regions are estimated by a Laplacian operator-based detector, based on which different weights are assigned to. Then, the improved SPN estimation is obtained by weighted averaging of image residuals. Finally, an edge guided weighted normalized cross-correlation measurement is proposed as similarity metric in source camera identification (SCI) applications. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by SCI experiments conducted on six models from the Dresden data set. Comparison results on different denoising algorithms and varying patch sizes reveal that performance improvement is more prominent for small image patches, which is demanding in real forensic applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Popescu, A.C., Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 53(2), 758–767 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Popescu, A.C., Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries in color filter array interpolated images. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 53(10), 3948–3959 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lin, Z., Wang, R., Tang, X., Shum, H.Y.: Detecting doctored images using camera response normality and consistency (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lukas, J., Fridrich, J., Goljan, M.: Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 1(2), 205–214 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, M., Fridrich, J., Goljan, M., Lukas, J.: Determining image origin and integrity using sensor noise. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 3(1), 74–90 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lukas, J., Fridrich, J., Goljan, M.: Detecting digital image forgeries using sensor pattern noise 6072 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, C.: Source camera identification using enhanced sensor pattern noise. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 5(2), 280–287 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, G., Kang, X., Liu, K.J.R.: A context adaptive predictor of sensor pattern noise for camera source identification. In: 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kang, X., Chen, J., Lin, K., Anjie, P.: A context-adaptive spn predictor for trustworthy source camera identification. Eurasip J. Image Video Process. 2014(1), 19 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeng, H., Kang, X.: Fast source camera identification using content adaptive guided image filter. J. Forensic Sci. 61(2), 520–526 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, L., Peng, F., Long, M.: Identifying source camera using guided image estimation and block weighted average. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 48, 471–479 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Zou, Z., Zang, Y., Yang, Y., Law, B.N.: Effective source camera identification based on msepll denoising applied to small image patches (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cortiana, A., Conotter, V., Boato, G., De Natale, F.G.B.: Performance comparison of denoising filters for source camera identification. Proc. SPIE 7880, 788007 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, X., Li, C.: Preprocessing reference sensor pattern noise via spectrum equalization. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 11(1), 126–140 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lawgaly, A., Khelifi, F., Bouridane, A.: Weighted averaging-based sensor pattern noise estimation for source camera identification, pp. 5357–5361 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mihcak, M.K., Kozintsev, I.V., Ramchandran, K.: Spatially adaptive statistical modeling of wavelet image coefficients and its application to denoising 6, 3253–3256 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., Egiazarian, K.: Image denoising by sparse 3-d transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16(8), 2080–2095 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, X.: Laplacian operator-based edge detectors. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29(5), 886–890 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsushita, K., Kitazawa, H.: An improved camera identification method based on the texture complexity and the image restoration. In: International Conference on Hybrid Information Technology, pp. 171–175 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chan, L., Law, N., Siu, W.: A confidence map and pixel-based weighted correlation for prnu-based camera identification. Digital Invest. 10(3), 215–225 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Satta, R.: Sensor pattern noise matching based on reliability map for source camera identification, pp. 222–226 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gloe, T., Bohme, R.: The ‘dresden image database’ for benchmarking digital image forensics, pp. 1584–1590 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2018YFC0831100), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 61305015, No. 61203269), the National Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2017MF057), and Shandong Province Key Research and Development Program, China (No. 2016GGX101022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun-Xia Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, WN., Liu, YX., Zhou, J., Yang, Y., Law, NF. (2020). An Improved Sensor Pattern Noise Estimation Method Based on Edge Guided Weighted Averaging. In: Chen, X., Yan, H., Yan, Q., Zhang, X. (eds) Machine Learning for Cyber Security. ML4CS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12487. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62460-6_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62460-6_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62459-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62460-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics