Skip to main content

Towards a Reference Ontology for Digital Platforms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12400))

Abstract

Digital platforms can be categorized into different types including ‘multi-sided platform’, ‘digital marketplace’, ‘crowdfunding platform’, ‘sharing economy platform’ and ‘on-demand platform’. As there is a lack of knowledge regarding the requirements and design of these digital platform types, we developed a method to design a digital platform reference ontology based on a taxonomy. The taxonomy provides an overview of digital platform properties, with the property values expressing the possible variations between digital platforms depending on their type. For each property value, we can create a digital platform reference ontology module using the five-step approach proposed by Ruy et al. [1] based on the patterns of the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO). UFO is a high-level ontology that provides us with basic concepts for objects, events, social elements and their types, relations and properties. These digital platform reference ontology modules can be combined as building blocks to compose our reference ontology for expressing the functionality for digital platforms of all types. We believe this reference ontology can be a step towards a better understanding of digital platform functionality, better communication between stakeholders and eventually may facilitate future research and development of digital platforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The full sample of existing digital platforms we used in our validation can be found on http://model-a-platform.com/sample-of-existing-digital-platforms/.

  2. 2.

    Other ontology modules are still work in progress and published at http://model-a-platform.com/digital-platform-ontology/.

  3. 3.

    http://model-a-platform.com/validation-of-the-digital-platform-reference-ontology/.

  4. 4.

    http://model-a-platform.com/digital-platform-ontology/.

  5. 5.

    www.ubereats.com.

References

  1. Ruy, F.B., Guizzardi, G., Falbo, R.A., Reginato, C.C., Santos, V.A.: From reference ontologies to ontology patterns and back. Data Knowl. Eng. 109, 41–69 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kenney, M., Zysman, J.: The rise of the platform economy. Issues Sci. Technol. 32, 61–69 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Görög, G.: The Definitions of sharing economy: a systematic literature review. Management 13, 175–189 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Puschmann, T., Alt, R.: Sharing economy. Bus. Inf Syst. Eng. 58, 93–99 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yin, C., Wang, X., Rong, W., Wang, T., David, B.: A system framework for sharing economy. In: Proceedings 2018 IEEE 22nd International Conference Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, CSCWD 2018, pp. 779–784 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sharetribe: Sharetribe Go (2019). https://github.com/sharetribe/sharetribe

  7. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 336–359 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu, L.: Understanding collaborative consumption business model: case of car sharing systems. DEStech Trans. Mater. Sci. Eng. 403–409 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Apte, U.M., Davis, M.M.: Sharing economy services: business model generation. Calif. Manage. Rev. 61, 104–131 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans, P.C., Gawer, A.: The rise of the platform enterprise a global survey. Cent. Glob. Enterp. 1–30 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sutherland, W., Jarrahi, M.H.: The sharing economy and digital platforms: a review and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 43, 328–341 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen, S., Llosa, S.: On the difficulty to define the sharing economy and collaborative consumption – literature review and proposing a different approach with the introduction of “collaborative services.” Journée la Relat. à la Marque dans un Monde Connect. 19–25 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Codagnone, C., Biagi, F., Abadie, F.: The passions and the interests: unpacking the “Sharing Economy.” (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ranjbari, M., Morales-Alonso, G., Carrasco-Gallego, R.: Conceptualizing the sharing economy through presenting a comprehensive framework. Sustainability 10(7), 2336 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanchez-Cartas, J.M., Leon, G.: Multi-sided platforms and markets: a literature review. SSRN Electron. J. 1–62 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hagiu, A., Wright, J.: Multi-sided platforms. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 43, 1–32 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T., Pinkse, J.: Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: an organizing framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 125, 1–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haas, P., Blohm, I., Leimeister, J.M.: An empirical taxonomy of crowdfunding intermediaries. In: 35th International Conference Information Systems Building a Better World Through Information Systems, ICIS 2014, pp. 1–18 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Täuscher, K., Laudien, S.M.: Understanding platform business models: a mixed methods study of marketplaces. Eur. Manag. J. 36, 319–329 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chasin, F., von Hoffen, M., Cramer, M., Matzner, M.: Peer-to-Peer Sharing and Collaborative Consumption Platforms: a Taxonomy and a Reproducible Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frenken, K., Schor, J.: Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions. 23, 3–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mamonova, Y.: Sharing Economy vs. On-Demand Economy: The Major Differences (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Acquier, A., Carbone, V., Massé, D.: How to create value (s) in the sharing economy: business models. Scalability Sustain. 9, 5–25 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ehikioya, S.A.: A formal model of peer-to-peer digital product marketplace. Int. J. Networked Distrib. Comput. 6, 143–154 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ritter, M., Schanz, H.: The sharing economy: a comprehensive business model framework. J. Clean. Prod. 213, 320–331 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Andersson, M., Hjalmarsson, A., Avital, M.: Peer-to-peer service sharing platforms: driving share and share alike on a mass-scale. In: Proceedings of 34th International Conference Information Systems, vol. 4, pp. 2964–2978 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gobble, M.A.M.: Defining the sharing economy. Res. Technol. Manag. 60, 59–61 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nardi, J.C., et al.: A commitment-based reference ontology for services. Inf. Syst. 54, 263–288 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Falbo, R.A., Guizzardi, G., Gangemi, A., Presutti, V.: Ontology patterns: clarifying concepts and terminology. CEUR Workshop Proc. 1188, 14–26 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Guizzardi, Giancarlo., Fonseca, Claudenir M., Benevides, Alessander Botti., Almeida, João Paulo A., Porello, Daniele, Sales, Tiago Prince: Endurant types in ontology-driven conceptual modeling: towards OntoUML 2.0. In: Trujillo, Juan C., Davis, Karen C., Du, Xiaoyong, Li, Zhanhuai, Ling, Tok Wang, Li, Guoliang, Lee, Mong Li (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 136–150. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Bezerra, C., Freitas, F., Santana, F.: Evaluating ontologies with competency questions. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence Intelligent Agent Technologies – Work, WI-IATW 2013, vol. 3, pp. 284–285 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gharib, M., Mylopoulos, J.: COPri - A Core Ontology for Privacy Requirements Engineering (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Carvalho, V., Giancarlo, G., …: Extending the Foundations of Ontology-based Conceptual Modeling with a Multi-Level Theory. In: International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Filistrucchi, L., Geradin, D., Van Damme, E., Affeldt, P.: Market definition in two-sided markets: theory and practice. J. Compet. Law Econ. 10, 293–339 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rochet, J., Tirole, J.: Platform competition in two-sided markets, pp. 5–6 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hagiu, A.: Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. Polym. Eng. Sci. 58, 928–942 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Evans, D.S.: The Antitrust economics of two-sided markets. SSRN Electron. J. 20, (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Katharina, H.: Innovation comes from platforms rather than from individual applications. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/innovation-comes-platforms-rather-individual-applications

  40. Asunción, G.-P., Mariano, F.-L., Oscar, C.: Ontological Engineering (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Guizzardi, Giancarlo, Sales, Tiago Prince: Detection, simulation and elimination of semantic anti-patterns in ontology-driven conceptual models. In: Yu, Eric, Dobbie, Gillian, Jarke, Matthias, Purao, Sandeep (eds.) ER 2014. LNCS, vol. 8824, pp. 363–376. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Radonjic-Simic, M., Richter, S., Pfistere, D.: Reference Model and Architecture for the Post-Platform Economy (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thomas Derave , Tiago Prince Sales , Frederik Gailly or Geert Poels .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 6.
figure 6

Ontology application of Uber Eats

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Derave, T., Sales, T.P., Gailly, F., Poels, G. (2020). Towards a Reference Ontology for Digital Platforms. In: Dobbie, G., Frank, U., Kappel, G., Liddle, S.W., Mayr, H.C. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12400. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62521-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62522-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics