Abstract
A significant growth of the population of senior citizens is estimated to be observed in the coming years, leading to the onset of socio-sanitary issues. Therefore, it is important to design tools that facilitate active ageing and prevent the occurrence of physical frailty in older people, making seniority a valuable resource rather than an issue of concern. Technology represents an efficient tool to take on such task, as it facilitates the replicability of human-centered trials. In particular, humanoid robotics have proven to be effective applied to weak users, notably in the treatment of people with cognitive disorders, both children (e.g. autistic) and older patients (e.g. Alzheimer). Humanoid robots could represent efficient tools in the design of trials to promote active ageing, since the latter are able to guide elderly people through exercises, to monitor proper execution and to give a real-time human-like feedback, with a consequent involvement of the users. Such high-level of engagement characterizes that kind of interactions, called Human-Humanoid interactions, which should be invested of the same importance of morphological and technological aspects during the design phases. In this paper we provide an overview of some humanoid robots which have been used over the last years in the revolutionary robotics field, providing a comparison of the principal interaction features in relation to what kind of user every robot was designed for.
Such preliminary study will serve as a basis to define the most appropriate aesthetic/behavioural features required in the design of a humanoid robot for the prevention of sarcopenia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Reference is made to co-bots by companies as Hanwha, Kuka and Aubo.
References
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, ... Schols J (2019) Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 48(1):16–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy169
Ethgen O, Beaudart C, Buckinx F, Bruyère O, Reginster JY (2017) The future prevalence of Sarcopenia in Europe: a claim for public health action. Calcif Tissue Int 100(3):229–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-016-0220-9
Eaton M (2015) Evolutionary humanoid robotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44599-0
Brooks RA, Aryananda L, Edsinger A, Fitzpatrick P, Kemp C, O’Reilly U-M et al (2004) Sensing and manipulating built-for-human environments. Int J Humanoid Rob 1(01):1–28
Mori M, MacDorman KF (2012) The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]. IEEE Rob Autom Mag 19(2):98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
Kajita S, Hirukawa H, Harada K, Yokoi K (2014) Introduction to humanoid robotics. Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/us/book/9783642545351
Valentí Soler M, Agüera-Ortiz L, Olazarán Rodríguez J, Mendoza Rebolledo C, Pérez Muñoz A, Rodríguez Pérez I, ... Martínez Martín P (2015) Social robots in advanced dementia. Front Aging Neurosci 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00133
Martinez-Martin E, del Pobil AP (2018) Personal robot assistants for elderly care: an overview. In Costa A, Julian V, Novais P (eds) Personal assistants: emerging computational technologies, pp. 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62530-0_5
Oberman LM, McCleery JP, Ramachandran VS, Pineda JA (2007) EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots. Neurocomputing 70(13):2194–2203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2006.02.024
Giannopulu I, Terada K, Watanabe T (2018) Communication using robots: a perceptionaction scenario in moderate ASD. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 30(5), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2018.1430865
Damiani P, Grimaldi R, Palmieri S (2013) Robotica educativa e aspetti non verbali nei Disturbi Specifici di Apprendimento. 1:1211–1220. Retrieved from https://iris.unito.it/handle/2318/134850#.XG_jvOhKjOg
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Porfirione, C., Burlando, F. (2021). Humanoid Robotics for Patients with Sarcopenia: A Preliminary Study on Interaction Features. In: Monteriù, A., Freddi, A., Longhi, S. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 725. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63107-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63107-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63106-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63107-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)