Skip to main content

A Comparative Study on Ethics Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence Across Nations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12555))

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the commonality and differences among AI research and development (R&D) guidelines across nations. Content analysis was conducted on AI R&D guidelines issued by more economically developed countries because they may guide the trend of AI-based applications in education. Specifically, this study consisted of three phases: 1) information retrieval, (2) key term extraction, and (3) data visualization. First, Fisher’s exact test was employed to ensure that different AI R&D guidelines (e.g., the latest ones in the US, EU, Japan, Mainland, and Taiwan) were comparable. Second, the Key Word Extraction System was developed to retrieve essential information in the guidelines. Third, data visualization techniques were performed on key terms across multiple guidelines. A word cloud revealed the similarity among guidelines (e.g., key terms that these guidelines share in common) while a color-coding scheme showed the differences (e.g., occurrence of a key term across guidelines and its frequency within a guideline). Importantly, three key terms, namely, AI, human, and development, are identified as essential commonality across guidelines. As for key terms that only extracted from particular guidelines, interestingly, results with the color-coding scheme suggested that these key terms were weighted differently depends on the developmental emphasis of a nation. Collectively, we discussed how these findings concerning ethics guidelines may shed light on AI research and development to educational technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aiken, R.M., Epstein, R.G.: Ethical guidelines for AI in education: starting a conversation. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 11, 163–176 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, S.Y., Chang, C.H., Chao, E., Chang, L.Y., Lee, S.H.: Challenges and reflections on ethics of artificial intelligence: a literature review. J. Inf. Soc. (in Press)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zeng, Y., Lu, E., Huangfu, C.: Linking artificial intelligence principles. In: Espinoza, H., Héigeartaigh, S.Ó., Huang, X., Hernández-Orallo, J., Castillo-Effen, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety, vol. 2301, pp. 103–106. Creative Commons CC0, Honolulu (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E.: The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 389–399 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems: Ethically Aligned Design (EAD1e) (2019). https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/ead1e.pdf?utm_medium=PR&utm_source=Web&utm_campaign=EAD1e&utm_content=geias&utm_term=undefined

  6. Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence: The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence Ethical Guidelines (2017). http://ai-elsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/JSAI-Ethical-Guidelines-1.pdf

  7. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Guidance for Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Applications (2020). https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Draft-OMB-Memo-on-Regulation-of-AI-1-7-19.pdf

  8. Digitimes: MOST announces AI R&D guidelines (2019). https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20190923PD209.html

  9. Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence: Beijing AI Principles (2019), https://www.baai.ac.cn/news/beijing-ai-principles-en.html

  10. European Commission: Artificial intelligence: Commission takes forward its work on ethics guidelines (2019). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_1893

  11. Tseng, Y.H.: Multilingual keyword extraction for term suggestion. In: Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 377–378. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tseng, Y.H.: Automatic key feature extraction from digital documents, PRC Patent No: ZL 00 1 22602.9. Application date: August 4, 2000. Effective from April 26, 2006 to August 4 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the grant MOST- 109-2634-F-003-008 from Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Yun Chang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lee, T.SH., Liu, SY., Wei, YL., Chang, LY. (2020). A Comparative Study on Ethics Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence Across Nations. In: Huang, TC., Wu, TT., Barroso, J., Sandnes, F.E., Martins, P., Huang, YM. (eds) Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12555. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63885-6_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63885-6_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63884-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63885-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics