Skip to main content

Chinese Students’ Motivations to Adopt E-Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Technologies and Learning (ICITL 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12555))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1953 Accesses

Abstract

Culture influences how students give meanings to, and engage with, e-learning. Since the predominance of research draws on models construed with values from the Western world they risk lacking congruence with other contexts. This study aims to identify the motives of students in Chinese culture towards e-learning and explain how these predict behavior. I use a form of laddering to identify students’ motives and associating organizing schema. Results show 37 motives draw students towards while 31 push them away from e-learning. The analysis reveals that students are drawn towards the temporal spatial benefits of e-learning. They, however they feel debilitated and lack a sense of mo-qi with both their classmates and the teacher. These results point towards a different conceptualization of e-learning motivations than seen so far in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chang, C.-Y., Tsai, C.-C.: The interplay between different forms of CAI and students’ preferences of learning environment in the secondary science class. Sci. Educ. 89(5), 707–724 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Puntambekar, S.: Analyzing collaborative interactions: divergence, shared understanding and construction of knowledge. Comput. Educ. 47(3), 332–351 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Herold, D.K.: Mediating media studies - stimulating critical awareness in a virtual environment. Comput. Educ. 54(3), 791–798 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jamaludin, A., Chee, Y.S., Ho, C.M.L.: Fostering argumentative knowledge construction through enactive role play in second Life. Comput. Educ. 53(2), 317–329 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Warden, C.A., Stanworth, J.O., Chang, C.-C.: Leveling up: are non-gamers and women disadvantaged in a virtual world classroom?”. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 210–219 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu, C.: Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15(1), 127–136 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao, G., Jiang, Z.: From e-campus to e-learning: an overview of ICT applications in Chinese higher education. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 41(4), 574–581 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao, J., McConnell, D., Jiang, Y.: Teachers’ conceptions of e-learning in Chinese higher education: a phenomenographic analysis. Campus-Wide Inf. Syst. 26(2), 90–97 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kember, D.: Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. High. Educ. 40(1), 99–121 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kember, D.: Reconsidering Open and Distance Learning in the Developing World: Meeting Students’ Learning Needs. Routledge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ivanović, D., Ho, Y.-S.: Highly cited articles in the information science and library science category in social science citation index: a bibliometric analysis. J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614537514

  12. Straub, E.T.: Understanding technology adoption: theory and future directions for informal learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 79(2), 625–649 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheung, R., Vogel, D.: Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: an extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Comput. Educ. 63, 160–175 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hung, M.-L., Chou, C., Chen, C.-H., Own, Z.-Y.: Learner readiness for online learning: scale development and student perceptions. Comput. Educ. 55(3), 1080–1090 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Persico, D., Manca, S., Pozzi, F.: Adapting the technology acceptance model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 614–622 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leidner, D.E., Kayworth, T.: Review: a review of culture in information systems research: toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Q. 30(2), 357–399 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bagozzi, R.P., Wong, N., Abe, S., Bergami, M.: Cultural and situational contingencies and the theory of reasoned action: application to fast food restaurant consumption. J. Consum. Psychol. 9(2), 97–106 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bagozzi, R.P., Leone, L., Bergami, M.: Hierachical representation of motives in goal setting. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 915–943 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bagozzi, R.P.: The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8(4), 244–254 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Loftus, J., Stavraky, T., Urquhart, B.L.: Design it yourself (DIY): in-house instructional design for online pharmacology. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 19(5), 645–659 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-013-9492-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giuntini, P., Venturini, J.-M.: Highjacking the MOOC: reflections on creating/teaching an art history MOOC. Curr. Iss. Emerg. ELearn. 2(1), 9 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Petrie, C.: The age of DIY. IEEE Internet Comput. 17(6), 93–94 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2013.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oettingen, G., Gollwitzer, P.M.: Goal setting and goal striving. In: Tesser, A. (ed.) EdIntraindividual Processes. Blackwell, Malden, pp. 329–347 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reynolds, T.J., Gutman, J.: Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. J. Advert. Res. 28(1), 11–31 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bagozzi, R.P., Dabholkar, P.A.: Consumer recycling goals and their effect on decisions to recycle: a means-end chain analysis. Psychol. Mark. 11(4), 313–340 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Berry, J.W.: Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: the operationalization of a compelling idea. Int. J. Psychol. 24(6), 721–736 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hsu, R.S., Stanworth, J.O.: Work as good-minded undertakings and effortless assignments: Chinese meaning of working for hospitality workers and its motivational implications. J. Organ. Behav. 39(1), 52–66 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weick, K.E.: Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad. Manage. Rev. 14(4), 516–531 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/258556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roca, J.C., Chiu, C.-M., Martínez, F.J.: Understanding e-learning continuance intention: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 64(8), 683–696 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ackerman, D., Walker, K.: Consumption of renao at a Taiwan night market. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 6(3), 209–222 (2012). http://dbs.ncue.edu.tw:2235/10.1108/17506181211246366

  31. Gao, G.: Don’t take my word for it– understanding Chinese speaking practices. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 22(2), 163–186 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stanworth, J.O., Hsu, R.S., Wang, J.T.: Chinese metaphors and narratives in self-service technology adoption. In: Presented at the 15th International Research Conference in Service Management, La Londe, France, June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  33. Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Henrie, C.R., Halverson, L.R., Graham, C.R.: Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: a review. Comput. Educ. 90, 36–53 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, J.: US and Chinese cultural beliefs about learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 95(2), 258 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James O. Stanworth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stanworth, J.O. (2020). Chinese Students’ Motivations to Adopt E-Learning. In: Huang, TC., Wu, TT., Barroso, J., Sandnes, F.E., Martins, P., Huang, YM. (eds) Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12555. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63885-6_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63885-6_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63884-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63885-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics