Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Blockchain Technology: Intrinsic Technological and Socio-Economic Barriers

FDSE’2020 Keynote

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Future Data and Security Engineering (FDSE 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12466))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Since the introduction of Bitcoin in 2009 and its immense resonance in media, we have seen a plethora of envisioned blockchain solutions. Usually, such blockchain solutions claim to be disruptive. Often, such disruptiveness takes the form of a proclaimed blockchain revolution. In this paper, we want to look at blockchain technology from a neutral, analytical perspective. Our aim is to understand technological and socio-economic barriers to blockchain solutions that are intrinsic in the blockchain technology stack itself. We look into the permissionless blockchain as well as the permissioned blockchain. We start with a characterization of cryptocurrency as one-tiered uncollateralized M1 money. We proceed with defining essential modes of business communications (message authentication, signature, registered letter, contract, order etc.) and how they are digitized classically. We review potential blockchain solutions for these modes of communications, including socio-economic considerations. At the technical level, we discuss scalability issues and potential denial-of-service attacks. On the other hand, we also look into four successful blockchain solutions and explain their design. Now: what is the blockchain revolution and how realistic is it? Will it shake up of our institutions? Or, vice versa: does it have to rely on a re-design of our institutions instead? Can we design useful blockchain solutions independent of fundamental institutional re-design? It is such questions which have motivated us to compile this paper and we hope that we are able to bring some light to them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008). https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

  2. Williamson, O.: Transaction cost economics: how it works; where it is headed. De Econ. 146, 23–58 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Koppenjan, J., Groenewegen, J.: Institutional design for complex technological systems. Int. J. Technol. Policy Manag. 5(3), 240–257 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell-Verduyn, M. (ed.): Bitcoin and Beyond: Cryptocurrencies. Blockchains and Global Governance. Routledge, Abingdon (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Narayanan, A., Clark, J.: Bitcoin’s academic pedigree. Commun. ACM 60(12), 36–45 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mendling, J., Weber, I., van der Aalst, W., et al.: Blockchains for business process management - challenges and opportunities. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 9(1), 1–16 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rikken, O., Janssen, M., Kwee, Z.: Governance challenges of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations. Inf. Polity 24(4), 397–417 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Janssen, M., Weerakkody, V., Ismagilova, E., Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z.: A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: integrating institutional, market and technical factors. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 50, 302–309 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Upadhyay, N.: Demystifying blockchain: a critical analysis of challenges, applications and opportunities. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 54, 1–26 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Voshmgir, S.: Token Economy - How the Web3 reinvents the Internet, 2nd edn. BlockchainHub Berlin, Berlin (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Antonopoulos, A.M.: Mastering Bitcoin: Programming the Open Blockchain. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes, E.: A cypherpunk’s manifesto. In: Schneier, B., Banisar, D. (eds.) The Electronic Privacy Papers: Documents on the Battle for Privacy in the Age of Surveillance, pp. 285–287. Wiley, Hoboken (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. DuPont, Q.: Experiments in algorithmic governance: a history and ethnography of “The DAO,” a failed decentralized autonomous organization. In: Campbell-Verduyn, M. (ed.) Bitcoin and Beyond: Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains and Global Governance, pp. 1–18. Routledge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation. HarperCollins, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schein, E.H.: Organizational Culture and Leadership. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lips, S., Aas, K., Pappel, I., Draheim, D.: Designing an effective long-term identity management strategy for a mature e-state. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E., Anderst-Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds.) EGOVIS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11709, pp. 221–234. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Pappel, I., Pappel, I., Tepandi, J., Draheim, D.: Systematic digital signing in Estonian e-government processes - influencing factors, technologies, change management. Trans. Large Scale Data Knowl. Cent. Syst. 16 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tsap, V., Pappel, I., Draheim, D.: Key success factors in introducing national e-identification systems. In: Dang, T.K., Wagner, R., Küng, J., Thoai, N., Takizawa, M., Neuhold, E.J. (eds.) FDSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10646, pp. 455–471. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70004-5_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Emmelhainz, M.A.: EDI: A Total Management Guide. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martinson, P.: Estonia – The Digital Republic Secured by Blockchain. PricewaterhouseCoopers, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bayer, D., Haber, S., Stornetta, W.S.: Improving the efficiency and reliability of digital time-stamping. In: Capocelli, R., De Santis, A., Vaccaro, U. (eds.) Sequences II, pp. 329–334. Springer, New York (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9323-8_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Merkle, R.: Protocols for public key cryptosystems. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, S&P 1980, p. 122 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Buldas, A., Saarepera, M.: Document verification with distributed calendar infrastructure. US Patent Application Publication No.: US 2013/0276058 A1 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Buldas, A., Kroonmaa, A., Laanoja, R.: Keyless signatures’ infrastructure: how to build global distributed hash-trees. In: Riis Nielson, H., Gollmann, D. (eds.) NordSec 2013. LNCS, vol. 8208, pp. 313–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41488-6_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Mota, C.: The rise of personal fabrication. In: Proceedings of the the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, C&C 2011, pp. 279–288. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tao, F., Cheng, Y., Zhang, L., Nee, A.Y.C.: Advanced manufacturing systems: socialization characteristics and trends. J. Intell. Manuf. 28(5), 1079–1094 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1042-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vedeshin, A., Dogru, J.M.U., Liiv, I., Draheim, D., Ben Yahia, S.: A digital ecosystem for personal manufacturing: an architecture for a cloud-based distributed manufacturing operating system. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems, MEDES 2019, pp. 224–228. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vedeshin, A., Dogru, J.M., Liiv, I., Ben Yahia, S., Draheim, D.: A secure data infrastructure for personal manufacturing based on a novel key-less, byte-less encryption method. IEEE Access 8, 40039–40056 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vedeshin, A., Dogru, J.M.U., Liiv, I., Yahia, S.B., Draheim, D.: Smart cyber-physical system for pattern recognition of illegal 3D designs in 3D printing. In: Hamlich, M., Bellatreche, L., Mondal, A., Ordonez, C. (eds.) SADASC 2020. CCIS, vol. 1207, pp. 74–85. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45183-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Brian Heater: Zap brings the manufacturing process to the cloud (2016). https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/12/zap/

  31. Isbjörnssund, K., Vedeshin, A.: Secure streaming method in a numerically controlled manufacturing system, and a secure numerically controlled manufacturing system. U.S. Patent 2014111587 A3, 3 December 2015

    Google Scholar 

  32. 3D Control Systems Inc.: 3DPrinterOS cloud world statistics (2020). https://cloud.3dprinteros.com/dashboard/#/world-statistics

  33. Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., et al.: Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Systems, EuroSys 2018, pp. 1–15. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. FinancesOnline: 47 Essential e-Signature Statistics: 2020 Market Share Analysis & Data (2020). https://financesonline.com/25-essential-e-signature-statistics-analysis-of-trends-data-and-market-share/

  35. Everis: Study on the Use of Electronic Identification (eID) for the European Citizens’ Initiative. Final Assessment Report. Everis, European Commission (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tsap, V., Pappel, I., Draheim, D.: Factors affecting e-ID public acceptance: a literature review. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E., Anderst-Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds.) EGOVIS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11709, pp. 176–188. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Cavallini, S., Bisogni, F., Gallozzi, D., Cozza, C., Aglietti, C.: Study on the supply-side of EU e-signature market: Final Study Report. Fondazione FORMIT, European Commission, Directorate-General Information Society and Media of the European Commission (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., Weerakkody, V.: Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: a systematic review and a conceptual framework. Int. Bus. Rev. 26(1), 164–175 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Carter, L., Liu, D.: Technology humanness, trust and e-government adoption. In: Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, ACIS 2018. Association for Information Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Agrello: Agrello ID - Identity based digital signatures (2020). https://www.agrello.id

  41. Liu, Yu., Liu, T.: A novel threshold signature scheme based on elliptic curve with designated verifier. In: Sun, X., Pan, Z., Bertino, E. (eds.) ICAIS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11635, pp. 332–342. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24268-8_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. The EU Parliament and the Council of the Eurpean Comission: Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L 257/73 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wood, G., et al.: Ethereum: a secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Proj. Yellow Pap. 151, 1–32 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Veriff: Veriff - identity verification done in seconds (2020). https://www.veriff.com. Accessed 05 Sept 2020

  45. Thinnect: Thinnect - IoT Edge of Network Service Provider (2020). https://www.thinnect.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Digital Forensics and Cyber Security, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

    Ahto Buldas

  2. Information Systems Group, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

    Dirk Draheim

  3. Graduate School of Management, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

    Takehiko Nagumo

  4. Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting, Tokyo, Japan

    Takehiko Nagumo

  5. 3D Control Systems Ltd., San Francisco, USA

    Anton Vedeshin

Authors
  1. Ahto Buldas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dirk Draheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Takehiko Nagumo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anton Vedeshin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Draheim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Tran Khanh Dang

  2. Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria

    Josef Küng

  3. Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan

    Makoto Takizawa

  4. Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea (Republic of)

    Tai M. Chung

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Buldas, A., Draheim, D., Nagumo, T., Vedeshin, A. (2020). Blockchain Technology: Intrinsic Technological and Socio-Economic Barriers. In: Dang, T.K., Küng, J., Takizawa, M., Chung, T.M. (eds) Future Data and Security Engineering. FDSE 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12466. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63924-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63924-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63923-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63924-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation