Skip to main content

D3PG: Decomposed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient for Continuous Control

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI 2020)

Abstract

In this paper, we study how structural decomposition and multiagent interactions can be utilized by deep reinforcement learning in order to address high dimensional robotic control problems. In this regard, we propose the D3PG approach, which is a multiagent extension of DDPG by decomposing the global critic into a weighted sum of local critics. Each of these critics is modeled as an individual learning agent that governs the decision making of a particular joint of a robot. We then propose a method to learn the weights during learning in order to capture different levels of dependencies among the agents. The experimental evaluation demonstrates that D3PG can achieve competitive or significantly improved performance compared to some widely used deep reinforcement learning algorithms. Another advantage of D3PG is that it is able to provide explicit interpretations of the final learned policy as well as the underlying dependencies among the joints of a learning robot.

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 62076259.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bu, L., Babu, R., De Schutter, B., et al.: A comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning. IEEE TSMC Part C 38(2), 156–172 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Busoniu, L., De Schutter, B., Babuska, R.: Decentralized reinforcement learning control of a robotic manipulator. In: 2006 9th ICARCV, pp. 1–6 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dong, Y., Yu, C., Weng, P., Maustafa, A., Cheng, H., Ge, H.: Decomposed deep reinforcement learning for robotic control. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 1834–1836 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duan, Y., Chen, X., Houthooft, R., Schulman, J., Abbeel: Benchmarking deep reinforcement learning for continuous control. In: ICML, pp. 1329–1338 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dziomin, U., Kabysh, A., Golovko, V., Stetter, R.: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach for the efficient control of mobile robot. In: 2013 IEEE 7th IDAACS, vol. 2, pp. 867–873 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Foerster, J., Assael, I.A., de Freitas, N., Whiteson, S.: Learning to communicate with deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. In: NIPS, pp. 2137–2145 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foerster, J.N., Farquhar, G., Afouras, T., et al.: Counterfactual multi-agent policy gradients. In: AAAI, pp. 7254–7264 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guestrin, C., Lagoudakis, M., Parr, R.: Coordinated reinforcement learning. In: ICML, vol. 2, pp. 227–234 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, J.K., Egorov, M., Kochenderfer, M.: Cooperative multi-agent control using deep reinforcement learning. In: Sukthankar, G., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A. (eds.) AAMAS 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10642, pp. 66–83. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71682-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Iqbal, S., Sha, F.: Actor-attention-critic for multi-agent reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.02912 (2018)

  11. Jiang, J., Lu, Z.: Learning attentional communication for multi-agent cooperation. In: NIPS, pp. 7254–7264 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kabysh, A., Golovko, V., Lipnickas, A.: Influence learning for multi-agent system based on reinforcement learning. Int. J. Comput. 11(1), 39–44 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kok, J.R., Vlassis, N.: Collaborative multiagent reinforcement learning by payoff propagation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7(Sep), 1789–1828 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leottau, D.L., Ruiz-del-Solar, J., MacAlpine, P., Stone, P.: A study of layered learning strategies applied to individual behaviors in robot soccer. In: Almeida, L., Ji, J., Steinbauer, G., Luke, S. (eds.) RoboCup 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9513, pp. 290–302. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29339-4_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Leottau, D.L., Ruiz-del Solar, J., Babuška, R.: Decentralized reinforcement learning of robot behaviors. Artif. Intell. 256, 130–159 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Leottau, D.L., Ruiz-del Solar, J.: An accelerated approach to decentralized reinforcement learning of the ball-dribbling behavior. In: Workshops at the Twenty-Ninth AAAI (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Y.: Deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.06339 (2018)

  18. Lillicrap, T.P., Hunt, J.J., Pritzel, A., et al.: Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971 (2015)

  19. Lowe, R., Wu, Y., Tamar, A., et al.: Multi-agent actor-critic for mixed cooperative-competitive environments. In: NIPS, pp. 6379–6390 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mao, H., Zhang, Z., et al.: Modelling the dynamic joint policy of teammates with attention multi-agent DDPG. In: AAMAS, pp. 1108–1116 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martin, J.A., De Lope, H., et al.: A distributed reinforcement learning architecture for multi-link robots. In: 4th ICINCO, vol. 192, p. 197 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Matignon, L., Laurent, G.J., Le Fort-Piat, N.: Design of semi-decentralized control laws for distributed-air-jet micromanipulators by reinforcement learning. In: 2009 IROS, pp. 3277–3283 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mnih, V., Badia, A.P., et al.: Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In: ICML, pp. 1928–1937 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peng, P., Yuan, Q., et al.: Multiagent bidirectionally-coordinated nets for learning to play StarCraft combat games, p. 2. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.10069 (2017)

  25. Peters, J., Schaal, S.: Natural actor-critic. Neurocomputing 71(7–9), 1180–1190 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rashid, T., Samvelyan, M., et al.: QMIX: monotonic value function factorisation for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. In: ICML, pp. 4292–4301 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Heess, N., et al.: Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and control. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01242 (2018)

  28. Schulman, J., Levine, S., Abbeel, P., et al.: Trust region policy optimization. In: ICML, pp. 1889–1897 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schulman, J., Moritz, P., et al.: High-dimensional continuous control using generalized advantage estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02438 (2015)

  30. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., et al.: Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 (2017)

  31. Sunehag, P., Lever, G., et al.: Value-decomposition networks for cooperative multi-agent learning based on team reward. In: AAMAS, pp. 2085–2087 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Todorov, E., Erez, T., Tassa, Y.: MuJoCo: a physics engine for model-based control. In: 2012 IROS, pp. 5026–5033 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Troost, S., Schuitema, E., Jonker, P.: Using cooperative multi-agent Q-learning to achieve action space decomposition within single robots. In: 1st ERLARS, p. 23 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: NIPS, pp. 5998–6008 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, T., Liao, R., et al.: NerveNet: learning structured policy with graph neural networks (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Williams, R.J.: Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Mach. Learn. 8(3–4), 229–256 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992696

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Yu, C., Wang, D., Ren, J., Ge, H., Sun, L.: Decentralized multiagent reinforcement learning for efficient robotic control by coordination graphs. In: Geng, X., Kang, B.-H. (eds.) PRICAI 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11012, pp. 191–203. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97304-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Appendix

A Appendix

1.1 A.1 Appendix

1.2 A.2 MuJoCo Platform

Below we provide some specifications for the states, actions and rewards of the four robot environments in MuJoCo.

Swimmer. The swimmer is a planar robot with 3 links and 2 actuated joints. Fluid is simulated through viscosity forces, which apply drag on each link, allowing the swimmer to move forward. The 8-dim observation includes the joint angles and velocities, and the coordinates of the center of mass. The reward is given by \(r(s, a) = v_x-0.005\cdot \) \(\parallel \) \(a\) \(\parallel \) \(_2^2\), where \(v_x\) is the forward velocity. No termination condition is applied.

Hopper. The hopper is a planar robot with 4 rigid links, corresponding to the torso, upper leg, lower leg, and foot, along with 3 actuated joints. The 11-dim observation includes joint angles, joint velocities, the coordinates of the center of mass, and the constraint forces. The reward is given by \(r(s, a) = v_x-0.005\cdot \) \(\parallel \) \(a\) \(\parallel \) \(_2^2 + 1\), where the last term is a bonus for being “alive”. The episode is terminated when \(z_{body}<\) 0.7, where \(z_{body}\) is the z-coordinate of the body, or when \(|\theta _y|<\) 0.2, where \(\theta _y\) is the forward pitch of the body.

Walker. The walker is a planar biped robot consisting of 7 links, corresponding to two legs and a torso, along with 6 actuated joints. The 17-dim observation includes joint angles, joint velocities, and the coordinates of center of mass. The reward is given by \(r(s, a) = v_x-0.005\cdot \) \(\parallel \) \(a\) \(\parallel \) \(_2^2\). The episode is terminated when \(z_{body}<\) 0.8, or \(z_{body}>\) 2.0, or \(|\theta _y|>\) 1.0.

Half-Cheetah. The half-cheetah is a planar biped robot with 9 rigid links, including two legs and a torso, along with 6 actuated joints. The 17-dim state includes joint angles, joint velocities, and the coordinates of the center of mass. The reward \(r(s, a) = v_x-0.005\cdot \) \(\parallel \) \(a\) \(\parallel \) \(_2^2\). No termination condition is applied.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dong, Y., Yu, C., Ge, H. (2020). D3PG: Decomposed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient for Continuous Control. In: Taylor, M.E., Yu, Y., Elkind, E., Gao, Y. (eds) Distributed Artificial Intelligence. DAI 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12547. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64096-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64096-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64095-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64096-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics