Skip to main content

Having a Positive Impact with Design Science Research – Learning from Effective Altruism

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Designing for Digital Transformation. Co-Creating Services with Citizens and Industry (DESRIST 2020)

Abstract

How to increase the chances of overall positive, rather than negative, impacts from new technology developments is expected to be a key challenge for the future of design-oriented research. In this context, we argue that a thorough understanding of the ethical dimension of research and technology is needed so that researchers can make an informed assessment of the expected impact of their work and carry it out more effectively. Myers and Venable [1] took a first step towards investigating the role of ethics in design science research (DSR) and proposed a tentative set of principles that aim to help researchers achieve outcomes that are good from an ethical perspective. We extend this stream of research and present an ethics-aware DSR framework, which describes how values and ethics are fundamentally related to DSR and how we measure its impact. Most importantly, the framework can act as an actionable guideline for how to maximize the expected positive impact of DSR projects. Moreover, the framework can also be used to discuss the structure, direction and expected positive impact of DSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors have a combined experience of over 15 years in DSR and more than 3 years in the EA movement.

References

  1. Myers, M.D., Venable, J.R.: A set of ethical principles for design science research in information systems. Inf. Manag. 51, 801–809 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 32, 337–355 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Winter, S.J., Butler, B.S.: Creating bigger problems: grand challenges as boundary objects and the legitimacy of the information systems field. J. Inf. Technol. 26, 99–108 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jirotka, M., Grimpe, B., Stahl, B., Eden, G., Hartswood, M.: Responsible research and innovation in the digital age. Commun. ACM 60, 62–68 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Constantinides, P., Chiasson, M.W., Introna, L.D.: The ends of information systems research: a pragmatic framework. MIS Q. 36, 1–19 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iivari, J.: A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tarafdar, M., Gupta, A., Turel, O.: The dark side of information technology use. Inf. Syst. J. 23, 269–275 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacAskill, W.: The definition of effective altruism. In: Greaves, H., Pummer, T. (eds.) Effective Altruism – Philosophical Issues. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Centre for Effective Altruism: Effective altruism concepts. https://concepts.effectivealtruism.com/. Accessed 01 Dec 2018

  11. Hevner, A.R.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 77–89 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36

  13. Singer, P.: Ethics (2019). https://www.britannica.com/topic/ethics-philosophy

  14. Centre for Effective Altruism: CEA’s guiding principles. https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/ceas-guiding-principles/. Accessed 01 Dec 2018

  15. Sinnott-Armstrong, W.: Consequentialism. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. MacAskill, W.: Normative uncertainty (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ord, T.: The moral imperative toward cost-effectiveness in global health (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jollimore, T.: Impartiality. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wiblin, R.: How to compare different global problems in terms of impact? https://80000hours.org/articles/problem-framework/. Accessed 04 Dec 2018

  20. The Library of Economics and Liberty: Margins and thinking at the margin. https://www.econlib.org/library/Topics/College/margins.html. Accessed 04 Dec 2018

  21. Centre for Effective Altruism: Introduction to effective altruism. https://www.effectivealtruism.org/articles/introduction-to-effective-altruism/. Accessed 04 Dec 2018

  22. Greaves, H., MacAskill, W., O’Keeffe-O’Donovan, R., Trammell, P.: A research agenda for the global priorities institute (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beckstead, N.: On the overwhelming importance of shaping the far future (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Herwix, A., Haj-Bolouri, A.: Having a Positive Impact with Design Science Research – Learning from Effective Altruism (Online Appendix) (2020). https://osf.io/pcv3e/

  25. Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., Kitsiou, S.: Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Inf. Manag. 52, 183–199 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Boell, S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS. J. Inf. Technol. 30, 161–173 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schroeder, M.: Value theory. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Herwix, A.: Towards a panorama of sustainable solutions: exploring a global learning partnership for sustainable development. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2020), Marrakesh, Morroco (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Carter, A.: A plurality of values (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Todd, B., 80,000 Hours team: Our new guide to doing good with your career. https://80000hours.org/key-ideas/. Accessed 19 Mar 2020

  31. Ellen, R.: The values-to-actions decision chain: a lens for improving coordination. https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/Ekzvat8FbHRiPLn9Z/the-values-to-actions-decision-chain-a-lens-for-improving. Accessed 03 Oct 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Herwix .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Herwix, A., Haj-Bolouri, A. (2020). Having a Positive Impact with Design Science Research – Learning from Effective Altruism. In: Hofmann, S., Müller, O., Rossi, M. (eds) Designing for Digital Transformation. Co-Creating Services with Citizens and Industry. DESRIST 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64823-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64823-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64822-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64823-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics