Skip to main content

Influence Maximization for Dynamic Allocation in Voter Dynamics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2652 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 943))

Abstract

In this paper, we study the competition between external controllers with fixed campaign budget in which one of the controllers attempts to maximize the share of a desired opinion in a group of agents who exchange opinions on a social network subject to voting dynamics. In contrast to allocating all the budget at the beginning of the campaign, we consider a version of a temporal influence maximization problem, where the controller has the flexibility to determine when to start control. We then explore the dependence of optimal starting times to achieve maximum vote shares at a finite time horizon on network heterogeneity. We find that, for short time horizons, maximum influence is achieved by starting relatively later on more heterogeneous networks than in less homogeneous networks, while the opposite holds for long time horizons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ali, K., Wang, C.Y., Chen, Y.S.: A novel nested q-learning method to tackle time-constrained competitive influence maximization. IEEE Access 7, 6337–6352 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alshamsi, A., Pinheiro, F.L., Hidalgo, C.A.: When to target hubs? Strategic diffusion in complex networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.00232 (2017)

  3. Brede, M., Restocchi, V., Stein, S.: Effects of time horizons on influence maximization in the voter dynamics. J. Complex Netw. 7(3), 445–468 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Budak, C., Agrawal, D., El Abbadi, A.: Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 665–674 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carnes, T., Nagarajan, C., Wild, S.M., Van Zuylen, A.: Maximizing influence in a competitive social network: a follower’s perspective. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 351–360 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Catanzaro, M., Boguná, M., Pastor-Satorras, R.: Generation of uncorrelated random scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. E 71(2), 027103 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomez-Rodriguez, M., Leskovec, J., Krause, A.: Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. ACM Trans. Knowl. Disc. Data (TKDD) 5(4), 1–37 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goyal, A., Bonchi, F., Lakshmanan, L.V.: Learning influence probabilities in social networks. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 241–250 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goyal, A., Bonchi, F., Lakshmanan, L.V., Venkatasubramanian, S.: On minimizing budget and time in influence propagation over social networks. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3(2), 179–192 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goyal, S., Heidari, H., Kearns, M.: Competitive contagion in networks. Games Econ. Behav. 113, 58–79 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Jankowski, J., Bródka, P., Kazienko, P., Szymanski, B.K., Michalski, R., Kajdanowicz, T.: Balancing speed and coverage by sequential seeding in complex networks. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–11 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 137–146 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kermani, M.A.M.A., Ardestani, S.F.F., Aliahmadi, A., Barzinpour, F.: A novel game theoretic approach for modeling competitive information diffusion in social networks with heterogeneous nodes. Phys. A 466, 570–582 (2017)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Korda, H., Itani, Z.: Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Prom. Pract. 14(1), 15–23 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lindsay, B.R.: Social media and disasters: current uses, future options, and policy considerations (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, B., Cong, G., Xu, D., Zeng, Y.: Time constrained influence maximization in social networks. In: 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 439–448. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Masuda, N.: Opinion control in complex networks. New J. Phys. 17(3), 033031 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Michalski, R., Jankowski, J., Bródka, P.: Effective influence spreading in temporal networks with sequential seeding. IEEE Access 8, 151208–151218 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moussaïd, M., Kämmer, J.E., Analytis, P.P., Neth, H.: Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation. PLoS ONE 8(11), e78433 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(14), 3200 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Press, W., Teukolsky, S., Vetterling, W., Flannery, B.: Section 10.11. linear programming: interior-point methods. In: Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P.: Numerical recipes in c (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Price, D.J.D.S.: Networks of scientific papers. Science 30, 510–515 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramos, M., Shao, J., Reis, S.D., Anteneodo, C., Andrade, J.S., Havlin, S., Makse, H.A.: How does public opinion become extreme? Sci. Rep. 5, 10032 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Redner, S.: Reality-inspired voter models: a mini-review. C.R. Phys. 20(4), 275–292 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Son, S.W., Jeong, H., Hong, H.: Relaxation of synchronization on complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 78(1), 016106 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tess, P.A.: The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)-a literature review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(5), A60–A68 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weisstein, E.W.: Gershgorin circle theorem (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wilder, B., Vorobeychik, Y.: Controlling elections through social influence. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 265–273. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Woo-Young, C.: Online civic participation, and political empowerment: online media and public opinion formation in Korea. Media Cult. Soc. 27(6), 925–935 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zaichkowsky, J.L., Garkey, J.R.: Defending your brand against imitation: consumer behavior, marketing strategies, and legal issues. Quorum Books Westport, CT (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongqi Cai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cai, Z., Brede, M., Gerding, E. (2021). Influence Maximization for Dynamic Allocation in Voter Dynamics. In: Benito, R.M., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Moro, E., Rocha, L.M., Sales-Pardo, M. (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications IX. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2020 2020. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 943. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65347-7_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65347-7_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65346-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65347-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics