Abstract
In 2018, one of the biggest cooperatives of autonomous workers (CAW) in Europe, strong of more than 30.000 members, started the development of a unified lexicon as an informal conceptual model of the organization. Researchers participated in this ambitious project, following an action-design-research method. Democratic and egalitarian values are essential at CAW, but the literature on how to account for these values when developing a conceptual model is scarce. This paper argues that defining a common vocabulary, which can be a first step to building a conceptual model for an organization, is not a politically neutral activity and should be executed transparently and fairly, especially in democratic organizations such as CAW. Based on the classic literature on language and power, this contribution presents five postulates to help modelers to account for power and influence when developing conceptual models in organizations, either when trying to acquire the monopoly of legitimate naming in a field, or when sharing the power he or she possesses, having acquired such a monopoly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Roa, H.N., Sadiq, S., Indulska, M.: Ontology Usefulness in Human Tasks: Seeking Evidence, p. 11, New Zealand (2014)
Desguin, S., Laurier, W.: Modelling services of cooperatives of autonomous workers to create a space for autonomy and security, p. 233, Brussels (2020)
Charles, J., Desguin, S.: Aux confins – Travail et foyer à l’heure du (dé)confinement, CESEP, UCLouvain, USL-B (2020)
Sadi, N.-E., Moulin, F.: Gouvernance coopérative : un éclairage théorique, Rev. Int. Léconomie Soc. Recma, no 333, p. 43–58 (2014)
Sein, M., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action Design Research, MIS Q. vol. 35, no 1, p. 37 (2011)
Robinson, S.: Conceptual modelling for simulation Part I: definition and requirements. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 59(3), 278–290 (2008)
Hirst, G.: Ontology and the Lexicon. Springer (2009)
Scheidgen, M., Fischer, J.: Human comprehensible and machine processable specifications of operational semantics. In: Akehurst, D.H., Vogel, R., Paige, R.F. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4530, pp. 157–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72901-3_12
Jasper, R., Uschold, M.: A Framework for understanding and classifying ontology applications. In: Proceeding of the 12th International Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modelling, and Management KAW, p. 20 (1999)
Wand, Y., Storey, V.C., Weber, R.: An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 24(4), 494–528 (1999)
Poels, G., Maes, A., Gailly, F., Paemeleire, R.: The pragmatic quality of resources-events-agents diagrams: an experimental evaluation: the pragmatic quality of REA diagrams. Inf. Syst. J. 21(1), 63–89 (2011)
Mol, A.: Ontological politics a word and some questions. Soc. Rev. 47, 74–89 (1999)
Clegg, S.R., Courpasson, D., Phillips, N.: Power and Organizations. Pine Forge Press (2006)
Law, J., Urry, J.: Enacting the social. Econ. Soc. 33, 390–410 (2004)
Sørensen, E.: The Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Whatmore, S.J.: Mapping knowledge controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 33, 587–598 (2009)
Fairclough, N.: Language and Power. Pearson Education (2001)
Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations (1953)
Wittgenstein, L., Logico-Philosophicus, T.: Annalen der Naturphilosophie (1921)
Bourdieu, P.: Ce que parler veut dire: L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Fayard, Paris (1982)
Bourdieu, P.: Langage et pouvoir symbolique. Le seuil, Paris (1991)
Bourdieu, P.: Espace social et genèse des “classes”, in Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, Le travail politique., Paris (1984)
Bourdieu, P.: Raisons pratiques. Le Seuil, Paris (1994)
Foucault, M.: Surveiller et punir. Gallimard, Paris (1975)
Foucault, M.: Les mots et les choses, vol. 42, Gallimard, Paris (1966)
Oakes, L.S., Townley, B., Cooper, D.J.: Business planning as pedagogy: language and control in a changing institutional field. Adm. Sci. Q. 43(2), 257–292 (1998)
Alvesson, M., Deetz, S.: Critical theory and postmodernism approaches to organizational studies. In: Handbook of Organization Studies, pp. 191–217, Sage, Thousand Oaks (1996)
Guizzardi, G., Ferreira Pires, L., van Sinderen, M.: An ontology-based approach for evaluating the domain appropriateness and comprehensibility appropriateness of modeling languages. In: Briand, L., Williams, C. (eds.) MODELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 691–705. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11557432_51
Veyer, S., Sangiorgio, J.: Les parts congrues de la coopération : penser la question de la propriété dans les Coopératives d’activités et d’emploi. L’exemple de la Scop Coopaname, RECMA, vol. N° 350, no 4, pp. 55–69, October 2018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Desguin, S., Laurier, W. (2020). Acquiring and Sharing the Monopoly of Legitimate Naming in Organizations, an Application in Conceptual Modeling. In: Grossmann, G., Ram, S. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12584. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65847-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65847-2_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65846-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65847-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)