Abstract
Disease progression for Glioblastoma multiforme patients is currently assessed with manual bi-dimensional measurements of the active contrast-enhancing tumor on Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI). This method is known to be susceptible to error; in the lack of a data-driven approach, progression thresholds had been set rather arbitrarily considering measurement inaccuracies. We propose a data-driven methodology for disease progression assessment, building on tumor volumetry, classical radiomics, and deep learning based features. For each feature type, we infer progression thresholds by maximizing the correlation of the time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). On a longitudinal study comprising over 500 data points, we observed considerable underestimation of the current volumetric disease progression threshold. We evaluate the data-driven disease progression thresholds based on expert ratings using the current clinical practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Following the recommendations for the number of bins in the PyRadiomics documentation.
References
Chappell, R., Miranpuri, S.S., Mehta, M.P.: Dimension in defining tumor response. J. Clin. Oncol. 16(3), 1234 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1998.16.3.1234
Ellingson, B.M., Wen, P.Y., Cloughesy, T.F.: Modified criteria for radiographic response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. Neurotherapeutics 14(2), 307–320 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-016-0507-6
van Griethuysen, J.J., et al.: Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res. 77(21), e104–e107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339
Isensee, F., Petersen, J., Kohl, S.A., Jäger, P.F., Maier-Hein, K.H.: nnU-Net: breaking the spell on successful medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08128 vol. 1, pp. 1–8 (2019)
Isensee, F., et al.: Automated brain extraction of multisequence MRI using artificial neural networks. Hum. Brain Mapp. 40(17), 4952–4964 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24750
James, K., et al.: Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. JNCI J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 91(6), 523–528 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.6.523
Kickingereder, P., et al.: Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 20(5), 728–740 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30098-1
Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization (2014)
Lao, J., et al.: A deep learning-based radiomics model for prediction of survival in glioblastoma multiforme. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10649-8
Mamonov, A.B., Kalpathy-Cramer, J.: Data From QIN GBM Treatment Response. The Cancer Imaging Archive. https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2016.nQF4gpn2
Menze, B.H., Jakab, A., et al.: The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 34(10), 1993–2024 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694
Reardon, D.A., Ballman, K.V., Buckner, J.C., Chang, S.M., Ellingson, B.M.: Impact of imaging measurements on response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. Neuro-Oncology 16(August), v24-vii35 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou286
Reuter, M., Gerstner, E.R., Rapalino, O., Batchelor, T.T., Rosen, B., Fischl, B.: Impact of MRI head placement on glioma response assessment. J. Neurooncol. 118(1), 123–129 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1403-8
Reuter, M., Rosas, H.D., Fischl, B.: Highly accurate inverse consistent registration: a robust approach. NeuroImage 53(4), 1181–1196 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2010.07.020
Russakovsky, O., et al.: ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vision 115(3), 211–252 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y
Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015 - Conference Track Proceedings. International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR, September 2015
Spearman, C.: The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 15(1), 72–101 (1904). https://doi.org/10.2307/1422689
Stupp, R., et al.: Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 352(10), 987–996 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330
Suter, Y., et al.: Deep learning versus classical regression for brain tumor patient survival prediction. In: Crimi, A., Bakas, S., Kuijf, H., Keyvan, F., Reyes, M., van Walsum, T. (eds.) BrainLes 2018. LNCS, vol. 11384, pp. 429–440. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11726-9_38
Suter, Y., et al.: Radiomics for glioblastoma survival analysis in pre-operative MRI: exploring feature robustness, class boundaries, and machine learning techniques. Cancer Imaging 20(1), 1–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00329-8
Weller, M., et al.: European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas, June 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30194-8
Xue, Z., Xin, B., Wang, D., Wang, X.: Radiomics-enhanced multi-task neural network for non-invasive glioma subtyping and segmentation. In: Mohy-ud-Din, H., Rathore, S. (eds.) RNO-AI 2019. LNCS, vol. 11991, pp. 81–90. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40124-5_9
Acknowledgements
We gladly acknowledge the funding received from the Swiss Cancer League (Krebsliga Schweiz), grant KFS-3979-08-2016 and the NVIDIA Corporation for donating a Titan Xp GPU. Computations were partly performed on Ubelix, the HCP cluster at the University of Bern.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Suter, Y., Knecht, U., Wiest, R., Hewer, E., Schucht, P., Reyes, M. (2020). Towards MRI Progression Features for Glioblastoma Patients: From Automated Volumetry and Classical Radiomics to Deep Feature Learning. In: Kia, S.M., et al. Machine Learning in Clinical Neuroimaging and Radiogenomics in Neuro-oncology. MLCN RNO-AI 2020 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12449. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66843-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66843-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66842-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66843-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)