Skip to main content

Influencing Factors of Students’ Online Learning Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Empirical Study Based on Random Forest Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12511))

Abstract

New coronavirus is wreaking havoc around the world and has a profound impact on the international community, especially on higher education. Online teaching provides an effective path for higher education to avoid the risk of cross-contagion in traditional classroom education under epidemic condition. In order to ensure the quality of online teaching during the epidemic, this study takes the students’ satisfaction of online education learning as a measurement object. 1120 online learners from 126 colleges and universities in 26 provinces were investigated through 50 questions survey in 10 dimensions. First, the chi-square test is used to pre-process all the characteristics of the factors, and 30 influencing factors with the highest feature correlation are selected. Random forest algorithm is used to establish a satisfaction classification model in the training set. The accuracy in the test set is 0.72. Through the ranking of feature contribution, the influential factors with higher weight are obtained. The results show that in online learning, the attractiveness of teachers’ teaching methods is the most influential factor, while curriculum arrangement and learning environment rank second and third. Finally, according to the research results, this paper puts forward some suggestions and countermeasures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’Deh, R., Sinclair, J.: Evaluating E-learning systems success: an empirical study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 102 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

  2. Huang, R., et al.: Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption: the chinese experience in maintaining undisrupted learning in COVID-19 outbreak (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, C., Chang, H., Chen, K.: Developing a performance evaluation matrix to enhance the learner satisfaction of an e-learning system. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. 1–19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1233809

  4. Al-Samarraie, H., Selim, H., Teo, T., Zaqout, F.: Isolation and distinctiveness in the design of e-learning systems influence user preferences. Interact. Learn. Envir. 25(1–4), 452–466 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1138313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalez-Gomez, F., Guardiola, J., Rodriguez, O.M., Alonso, M.A.M.: Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 283–290 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sweeney, J.C., Ingram, D.: A comparison of traditional and web-based tutorials in marketing education: an exploratory study. J. Mark. Educ. 23(1), 55–62 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475301231007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun, P.C., Tsai, R.J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.Y., Yeh, D.: What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Comput. Educ. 50(4), 1202 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolliger, D., Martindale, T.: Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. Int. J. E-Learn. 3, 61–67 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Udo, G.J., Bagchi, K.K., Kirs, P.J.: Using SERVQUAL to assess the quality of e-learning experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(3), 1272–1283 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liaw, S.S.: Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: a case study of the blackboard system. Comput. Educ. 51(2), 864–873 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, J.H., Tennyson, R.D., Hsia, T.L.: A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Comput. Educ. 55(1), 155–164 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hong, K.-S.: Relationships between students’ and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course. Internet High. Educ. (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00105-7

  13. Harrati, N., Bouchrika, I., Tari, A., Ladjailia, A.: Exploring user satisfaction for e-learning systems via usage-based metrics and system usability scale analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 463–471 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elia, G., Solazzo, G., Lorenzo, G., Passiante, G.: Assessing learners’ satisfaction in collaborative online courses through a big data approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 92(MAR), 589–599 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.033

  15. Wang, C., et al.: Need satisfaction and need dissatisfaction: a comparative study of online and face-to-face learning contexts. Comput. Hum. Behav. 95, 114–125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas, E.H.G.N.: What satisfies students?: Mining student-opinion data with regression and decision tree analysis. Res. High. Educ. 45 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/b:rihe.0000019589.79439.6e

  17. Chen, C.M., Chen, M.C.: Mobile formative assessment tool based on data mining techniques for supporting web-based learning. Comput. Educ. 52(1), 256–273 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jöreskog, K., Sorbom, D.: LISREL 8.8 for Windows [Computer software] (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Swan, K., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., Maher, G., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E.: Building knowledge building communities: consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 23(4), 359–383 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2190/XKLM-3A96-2LAV-CB3L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Swan, K.: Virtual interaction: design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Dist. Educ. 22(2), 306–331 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Hiltz, S.R.: The Virtual Classroom: Learning Without Limits via Computer Networks. Ablex Publishing Corp. (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(96)90017-7

  22. Hackley, J.W.A.P.: Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Acad. Manage. J. 40(6), 1282–1309 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/257034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Selim, H.M.: Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: confirmatory factor models. Comput. Educ. 49(2), 396–413 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. DE Leidner, Jarvenpaa, S.L.: The information age confronts education: case studies on electronic classrooms. Inf. Syst. Res. 1(4), 24–54 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jarvenpaa, D.E.L.A.: Special issue on IS curricula and pedagogy || The use of information technology to enhance management school education: a theoretical view. MIS Quart. 19(3), 265–291 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/249596

  26. Kinshuk, D., Yang, A.: Web-based Asynchronous Synchronous Environment for Online Learning. United States Dist. Educ. Assoc. J. 17, 5–17 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, J.H., Tennyson, R.D., Hsia, T.L., Liao, Y.W.: Analysis of E-learning innovation and core capability using a hypercube model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(5), 1851–1866 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Haddad, W.D.: Is instructional technology a must for learning? Techknowlogia (1) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yunus, M.M.: Malaysian ESL Teachers’ Use of ICT in Their Classrooms: Expectations and Realities. Cambridge University Press (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344007000614

  30. Yuen, A.H.K., Ma, W.W.K.: Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. J. Technol. Teach. Educ. 10(3), 365–382 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Martínez, J.C.R.A.: Understanding e-learning continuance intention: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. ST (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003

  32. Olabode, T.O., Omoniyi, I.O.: Effectiveness of animation and multimedia teaching on students’ performance in science subjects. Br. J. Educ. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2(4), 201–210 (2014). https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2014/3340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mohammadi, F., Abrizah, A., Nazari: is the information fit for use? Exploring teachers perceived information quality indicators for Farsi web-based learning resources. Malays. J. Libr. Inf. SC 20 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ali, W.: Online and Remote learning in higher education institutes: a necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic. High. Educ. Stud. 10, 16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Girik Allo, M.: Is the online learning good in the midst of Covid-19 Pandemic? Case EFL Learn. 10, 1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunmei Han .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, Y., Zhang, P., Yang, H., Zhao, K., Han, C. (2021). Influencing Factors of Students’ Online Learning Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Empirical Study Based on Random Forest Algorithm. In: Pang, C., et al. Learning Technologies and Systems. SETE ICWL 2020 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12511. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66906-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66906-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66905-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66906-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics