Skip to main content

Predicting Potential Difficulties in Second Language Lexical Tone Learning with Support Vector Machine Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning Technologies and Systems (SETE 2020, ICWL 2020)

Abstract

Second language speech learning is affected by learners’ native language backgrounds. Teachers can facilitate learning by tailoring their pedagogy to cater for unique difficulties induced by native language interference. The present study employed Support Vector Machine (SVM) models to simulate how naïve listeners of diverse tone languages will assimilate non-native lexical tone categories into their native categories. Based on these simulated assimilation patterns and extrapolating basic principles from the Perceptual Assimilation Model (Best 1995), we predicted potential learning difficulties for each group. The results offer teachers guidance concerning which tone(s) to emphasize when instructing students from particular language backgrounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One token was mispronounced and thus was deleted.

References

  1. Tyler, M.D., Best, C.T., Faber, A., Levitt, A.G.: Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts. Phonetica 71, 4–21 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Best, C.T.: A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In: Strange, W. (ed.) Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, pp. 171–204. Timonium, York Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Best, C.T., Tyler, M.D.: Nonnative and second-language speech perception: commonalities and complementarities. In: Bohn, O.-S., Munro, M.J. (eds.) Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning, pp. 13–34. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flege, J.E.: Second-language speech learning: theory, findings, and problems. In: Strange, W. (ed.) Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, pp. 229–273. York Press, Timonium (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kuhl, P.K., Iverson, P.: Linguistic experience and the “Perceptual Magnet Effect.” In: Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, pp. 121–154. York Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, J., Best, C.T., Antoniou, M., Kasisopa, B.: Cognitive factors in perception of Thai tones by naïve Mandarin listeners. In: Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., Warren, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th ICPHS, Melbourne, pp. 1684–1688 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faris, M.M., Best, C.T., Tyler, M.D.: Discrimination of uncategorised non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. J. Phon. 70, 1–19 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Strange, W., Bohn, O.-S., Trent, S.A., Nishi, K.: Acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1791–1807 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Escudero, P., Simon, E., Mitterer, H.: The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners: acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception. J. Phon. 40, 280–288 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Styler, W.: On the Acoustical and Perceptual Features of Vowel Nasality (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, J., He, X.: Computational perception of information foci produced by Chinese English learners and American English speakers. In: Proceedings of APSIPA Annual Summit and Conference 2019, Lanzhou, pp. 1780–1785 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Strange, W.: cross-language phonetic similarity of vowels: theoretical and methodological issues. In: Bohn, O.-S., Munro, M.J. (eds.) Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning, pp. 35–55. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Yip, M.: Tone. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gandour, J.T.: The perception of tone. In: Tone: A Linguistic Survey, pp. 41–76. Academic Press (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reid, A., et al.: Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: The roles of language experience and visual information. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 77(2), 571–591 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0791-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chao, Y.R.: A system of tone-letters. Maitre Phon. 45, 24–27 (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lobanov, B.M.: Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 606–608 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, J., Best, C.T., Antoniou, M.: Native phonological and phonetic influences in perceptual assimilation of monosyllabic Thai tones by Mandarin and Vietnamese listeners. J. Phon. 83, 101013 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Burnham, D., Kuratate, T., McBride-Chang, C., Mattock, K.: Making speech three-dimensional: adding tone to consonant- and vowel-based speech perception and language acquisition research, quantification and theory (2009). http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP0988201

  20. Boersma, P.: Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int. 5, 341–345 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, Y.: ProsodyPro—a tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuang, J.: The tonal space of contrastive five level tones. Phonetica 70, 1–23 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dimitriadou, E., Hornik, K., Leisch, F., Meyer, D., Weingessel, A.: Misc functions of the Department of Statistics (e1071), TU Wien. R Package, 1, 5–24 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Escudero, P., Vasiliev, P.: Cross-language acoustic similarity predicts perceptual assimilation of Canadian English and Canadian French vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, EL277–EL283 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3632043

  25. Chen, J., Best, C.T., Antoniou, M., Kasisopa, B.: Cross-language categorisation of monosyllabic Thai tones by Mandarin and Vietnamese speakers: L1 phonological and phonetic influences. In: Epps, J., Wolfe, J., Smith, J., Jones, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventeenth Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Sydney, Australia, pp. 168–172 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Best, C.T., Avesani, C., Tyler, M.D., Vayra, M.: PAM revisits the articulatory organ hypothesis: italians’ perception of english anterior and Nuu-Chah-Nulth posterior voiceless fricatives. In: Nyvad, A.M., Hejná, M., Højen, A., Jespersen, A.B., and Sørensen, M.H. (eds.) A Sound Approach to Language Matters: In Honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn, pp. 13–40 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, X., Munro, M.J., Wang, Y.: Tone assimilation by Mandarin and Thai listeners with and without L2 experience. J. Phon. 46, 86–100 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a China Scholarship Council and Western Sydney University Joint scholarship awarded to the first author, Juqiang Chen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juqiang Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, J., Best, C.T., Antoniou, M. (2021). Predicting Potential Difficulties in Second Language Lexical Tone Learning with Support Vector Machine Models. In: Pang, C., et al. Learning Technologies and Systems. SETE ICWL 2020 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12511. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66906-5_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66906-5_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66905-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66906-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics