Skip to main content

Towards Ethical Guidelines of Location-Based Games: Challenges in the Urban Gaming World

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 407))

Abstract

Location-based games—urban games which are played in real life locations—are growing their share in the mobile gaming markets. While these kinds of games have been present since the growing popularity of so-called feature phones, they gained remarkable momentum through the popularity of Niantic Inc.’s Pokémon Go, Ingress and later Harry Potter: Wizards Unite. As modern location-based games are gathering hundred of millions dollars monthly revenue, also related social, economical, and even juridical questions have raised; however, the ethical questions embodied into the location-based games or augmented reality games have not been completely unveiled. As the mobile game industry is growing its importance in the software industry, also business ethics questions should be taken into account during the design and development of game products and services. This paper seeks to understand the relevant ethical concerns of location-based games by using the viewpoints of individual, community and business.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sam Desatoff. “Pokemon Go surpasses $3.6 billion in lifetime revenue”. GameDaily.biz. July 6, 2020. https://gamedaily.biz/article/1795/pokemon-go-surpasses-36-billion-in-lifetime-revenue.

  2. 2.

    Christopher Huffaker. “There are fewer Pokemon Go locations in black neighborhoods, but why?". Miami Herald. July 14, 2016. https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article89562297.html.

References

  1. Aal, K., Hauptmeier, H.: Pokémon GO: collaboration and information on the GO. In: Proceedings of 17th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, A.: The ethics of augmenting reality. In: CEPE/Ethicomp 2017 Electronic Collection, Proceedings of CEPE/Ethicomp 2017, pp. 1–3 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alha, K., Koskinen, E., Paavilainen, J., Hamari, J.: Why do people play location-based augmented reality games: a study on Pokémon GO. Comput. Hum. Behav. 93, 114–122 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baranowski, T., Lyons, E.J.: Scoping review of Pokemon Go: comprehensive assessment of augmented reality for physical activity change. Games Health J. 9(2), 71–84 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gray, C.M., Kou, Y., Battles, B., Hoggatt, J., Toombs, A.L.: The dark (patterns) side of UX design. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2018, pp. 1–14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108

  6. Hyrynsalmi, S., Kimppa, K.K., Smed, J.: The ethics of game experience. In: Bostan, B. (ed.) Game User Experience And Player-Centered Design. ISCEMT, pp. 253–263. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37643-7_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyrynsalmi, S., Smed, J., Kimppa, K.K.: The dark side of gamification: how we should stop worrying and study also the negative impacts of bringing game design elements to everywhere. In: Tuomi, P., Perttula, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International GamiFIN Conference. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1857, pp. 96–109. CEUR-WS, May 2017. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1857/gamifin17_p13.pdf

  8. Juhász, L., Hochmair, H.H.: Where to catch ‘em all? - a geographic analysis of Pokémon Go locations. Geo-Spatial Inf. Sci. 20(3), 241–251 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly, R.M., Ferdous, H.S., Wouters, N., Vetere, F.: Can mobile augmented reality stimulate a honeypot effect? Observations from Santa’s Lil helper. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, T.W., Werbach, K.: More than just a game: ethical issues in gamification. Ethics Inf. Technol. 18(2), 157–173 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9401-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kimppa, K.K., Heimo, O.I., Harviainen, J.T.: First dose is always freemium. ACM SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 45(3), 132–137 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kowert, R., Kaye, L.K.: Video games are not socially isolating. In: Ferguson, C.J. (ed.) Video Game Influences on Aggression, Cognition, and Attention, pp. 185–195. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95495-0_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Laato, S., Hyrynsalmi, S.M., Paloheimo, M.: Online multiplayer games for crowdsourcing the development of digital assets. In: Hyrynsalmi, S., Suoranta, M., Nguyen-Duc, A., Tyrväinen, P., Abrahamsson, P. (eds.) ICSOB 2019. LNBIP, vol. 370, pp. 387–401. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33742-1_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Laato, S., et al.: Do primal instincts explain engagement in location-based games? A hypothesis-forming focus group study on territorial behavior. In: Proceedings of the 4th International GamiFIN Conference. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2637, pp. 115–125. CEUR-WS.org (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leorke, D.: Location-Based Gaming. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0683-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Mason, R.O.: Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Q. 5–12 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mukhra, R., Baryah, N., Krishan, K., Kanchan, T.: “Pokémon Go” and ethical considerations – are Pokémons poking us enough? J. Inf. Ethics 28, 117–124 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Neely, E.L.: Augmented reality, augmented ethics: who has the right to augment a particular physical space? Ethics Inf. Technol. 21(1), 11–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9484-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paasovaara, S., Jarusriboonchai, P., Olsson, T.: Understanding collocated social interaction between Pokémon GO players. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, pp. 151–163 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paay, J., Kjeldskov, J., Internicola, D., Thomasen, M.: Motivations and practices for cheating in Pokémon GO. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 1–13 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pourchon, R., et al.: Is augmented reality leading to more risky behaviors? An experiment with Pokémon Go. In: Nah, F.F.-H., Tan, C.-H. (eds.) HCIBGO 2017. LNCS, vol. 10293, pp. 354–361. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58481-2_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Rantanen, M.M.: Towards ethical guidelines for fair data economy-thematic analysis of values of Europeans. In: Proceedings of the Third Seminar on Technology Ethics 2019, pp. 27–38. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roquilly, C.: Control over virtual worlds by game companies: issues and recommendations. MIS Q. 35(3), 653–671 (2011). http://www.jstor.org/stable/23042802

  24. Sicart, M.: The banality of simulated evil: designing ethical gameplay. Ethics Inf. Technol. 11(3), 191–202 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang, Y., Xiong, J.J., Becerril-Arreola, R., Iyer, L.S.: Ethics of blockchain. Inf. Technol. People 33(2), 602–632 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vahlo, J., Kaakinen, J.K., Holm, S.K., Koponen, A.: Digital game dynamics preferences and player types. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 22(2), 88–103 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, Y., Chen, V.H.H.: Understanding online game cheating: unpacking the ethical dimension. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 34(8), 786–797 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yee, N.: Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychol. Behav. 9(6), 772–775 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao, B., Zhang, S.: Rethinking spatial data quality: Pokémon Go as a case study of location spoofing. Prof. Geogr. 71(1), 96–108 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja M. Hyrynsalmi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hyrynsalmi, S.M., Rantanen, M.M., Hyrynsalmi, S. (2021). Towards Ethical Guidelines of Location-Based Games: Challenges in the Urban Gaming World. In: Klotins, E., Wnuk, K. (eds) Software Business. ICSOB 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 407. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67292-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67292-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67291-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67292-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics