Skip to main content

A Trend Analysis of Software Business Research

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Business (ICSOB 2020)

Abstract

International Conference on Software Business (ICSOB), one of the first software-intensive business specific conference series, was founded in 2010 and during the last decade, it has each year hosted tens of studies addressing various aspects of doing business with software products and services. As the conference has remained rather similar, it acts as a showcase on recent development trends in software-intensive business research. This short study uses all documents (n = 249) published in ICSOB conferences from 2010 to 2019 as a material for a trend analysis of the field. The metadata of all documents were gathered from Scopus and co-word bibliometric analysis was used to illustrate temporal clusters of research. In addition, the paper illustrate most active institutions and authors in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Most Valuable Companies in the World – 2020. https://fxssi.com/top-10-most-valuable-companies-in-the-world. Accessed January 8, 2021.

  2. 2.

    Search term for this review is “ISSN (1865-1348) AND (VOLUME (370) OR VOLUME(336) OR VOLUME(304) OR VOLUME(240) OR VOLUME(210) OR VOLUME(182) OR VOLUME(150) OR VOLUME(114) OR VOLUME(80) OR VOLUME(51))”.

References

  1. Callon, M., Law, J., Rip, A.: How to study the force of science. In: Callon, M., Law, J., Rip, A. (eds.) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, pp. 3–15. Palgrave Macmillan, London (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Coulter, N., Monarch, I., Konda, S.: Software engineering as seen through its research literature: a study in co-word analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 49(13), 1206–1223 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandes, J.M.: Authorship trends in software engineering. Scientometrics 101(1), 257–271 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1331-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garousi, V., Fernandes, J.M.: Quantity versus impact of software engineering papers: a quantitative study. Scientometrics 112(2), 963–1006 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2419-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garousi, V., Fernandes, J.M.: Highly-cited papers in software engineering: the top-100. Inf. Softw. Technol. 71, 108–128 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glass, R.L.: An assessment of systems and software engineering scholars and institutions. J. Syst. Softw. 27(1), 63–67 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jansen, S.: There’s no business like software business: trends in software intensive business research. In: Hyrynsalmi, S., Suoranta, M., Nguyen-Duc, A., Tyrväinen, P., Abrahamsson, P. (eds.) ICSOB 2019. LNBIP, vol. 370, pp. 19–27. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33742-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Karanatsiou, D., Li, Y., Arvanitou, E.M., Misirlis, N., Wong, W.E.: A bibliometric assessment of software engineering scholars and institutions (2010–2017). J. Syst. Softw. 147, 246–261 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kitchenham, B.A., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. version 2.3. EBSE Technical report EBSE-2007-01, Keele University, Keele, Staffs, United Kingdom, July 2007

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seppänen, M., Hyrynsalmi, S., Manikas, K., Suominen, A.: Yet another ecosystem literature review: 10 + 1 research communities. In: 2017 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit (E-TEMS), pp. 1–8. E-TEMS 2017, IEEE, October 2017

    Google Scholar 

  11. Suominen, A., Hyrynsalmi, S., Seppänen, M.: Ecosystems here, there, and everywhere – a barometrical analysis of the roots of ‘software ecosystem’. In: Maglyas, A., Lamprecht, A.-L. (eds.) Software Business. LNBIP, vol. 240, pp. 32–46. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40515-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Unterkalmsteiner, M., Abrahamsson, P., Wang, X., et al.: Software startups - a research agenda. e Informatica Softw. Eng. J. 10(1), 89–124 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2), 523–538 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Raan, A., Tijssen, R.: The neural net of neural network research: an exercise in bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 26(1), 169–192 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Hyrynsalmi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hyrynsalmi, S., Suominen, A. (2021). A Trend Analysis of Software Business Research. In: Klotins, E., Wnuk, K. (eds) Software Business. ICSOB 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 407. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67292-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67292-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67291-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67292-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics