Skip to main content

The Differential Effects of Distance Learning and Presential Classroom Instructions on Performance of Male and Female Students of Science Education in Undergraduate Introductory Biology Course

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bridges and Mediation in Higher Distance Education (HELMeTO 2020)

Abstract

As COVID-19 pandemic has closed schools in most countries of the world, education systems are struggling to meet the needs of schools and keep pace with international best practices during these unprecedented times. The trauma of the pandemic crisis is having far reaching effects that will worsen long-standing gender gaps in achievements and interest in sciences in favor of males, if not tackled. Limited gains in gender equality made over decades are in danger of being lost due to COVID-19 pandemic, if education systems keep on in dormant moods as they are in many countries due to lockdown. There is an urgent need of breaking off Higher Education dormancy through Distance Learning in programs/courses implementation across the world. In this study, we explored the differential effects of Distance learning (DL) and Presential classroom instructions on achievement and interest of Science Education undergraduate students offering Basic Biology course. Quasi-experiment, pre-test post-test non-equivalent control group research design was used.150 undergraduate degree students offering SED 111 in 2019/2020 session constituted the sample. Participants were volunteers from Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Mathematics special areas. These were assigned to groups 1 and 2. Group 1 (24 males and 51 females = 75) were exposed to Distance Learning while group 2 (22 males and 53females) were exposed to Presential classroom instructions with a keen safety consciousness against Covid-19 spread. Findings showed that DL exerted a profound effect on the two dependent variables studied more than the Presential classroom instructions. Gender had no significant influence on students’ achievement and interest within DL group. Since Distance Learning has shown to be superior and indispensable for teaching and learning in a changing world, higher education stakeholders need to embrace, plan, learn, and use DL now and as post pandemic measure for curriculum implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://fcit.usf.edu/distance/default.htm.

  2. 2.

    https://www.hanoverresearch.com/evaluation/index.php Retrieved 29/3/20.

References

  1. Middleton, A.J.: How effective is distance education? Int. J. Instr. Media 24, 133 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shachar, M., Neumann, Y.: Twenty years of research on the academic performance differences between traditional and distance learning: summative meta-analysis and trend examination. MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach. 6 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Francescucci, A., Foster, M.: The VIRI (Virtual, Interactive, Real-Time, Instructor-Led) classroom: the impact of blended synchronous online courses on student performance engagement, and satisfaction, Canadian. J. High. Educ. 43, 78–91 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gossenheimer, A.N., Bem, T., Carneiro, M.L.F., de Castro, M.S.: Impact of distance education on academic performance in a pharmaceutical care course. PloS One 12 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, P.-S.D., Lambert, A.D., Guidry, K.R.: Engaging online learners: the impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Comput. Educ. 54, 1222–1232 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, S., Kuh, G.D.: Computing Experience and Good Practices in Undergraduate Education: Does the Degree of Campus Wiredness Matter? (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laird, T.F.N., Kuh, G.D.: Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement. Res. High. Educ. 46, 211–233 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson, C.C., Hullinger, H.: New benchmarks in higher education: student engagement in online learning. J. Educ. Bus. 84, 101–109 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Korobova, N., Starobin, S.S.: A comparative study of student engagement, satisfaction, and academic success among international and American students. J. Int. Students 5, 72–85 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duderstadt, J.J., Atkins, D.E., Van Houweling, D.E., Van Houweling, D.: Higher Education in the Digital Age: Technology Issues and Strategies for American Colleges and Universities. Greenwood Publishing Group (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thurmond, V., Wambach, K.: Understanding interactions in distance education: a review of the literature. Int. J. Instr. Technol. Distance Learn. 1, np (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Larwin, K.H., Erickson, M.J., Given, E.: The potential impact of online/distance education for K-12 special education students: a meta-analytic investigation. In: Presentation at the Conference on Higher Education Pedagogy, Blacksburg, VA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibe, E., Abamuche, J.: Effects of audiovisual technological aids on students’ achievement and interest in secondary school biology in Nigeria. Heliyon 5, e01812 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galdi, S., Cadinu, M., Tomasetto, C.: The roots of stereotype threats: when automatic association disrupt girls maths performance. Child Dev. 85, 250–263 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dimitrov, D.M.: Gender differences in science achievement: differential effect of ability, response format, and strands of learning outcomes. Sch. Sci. Math. 99, 445–450 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., Simons, R.: University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Stud. High. Educ. 27, 27–52 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R.O., Nunamaker, Jr. J.F.: Instructional video in e-learning: assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Inf. Manag. 43, 15–27 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K.: Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sadaghiani, H.R.: Using multimedia learning modules in a hybrid-online course in electricity and magnetism. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.-Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 010102 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vygotsky, L.: Socio-cultural Theory. Mind in Society (1978)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Aneke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ibe, E., Aneke, J., Abamuche, J. (2021). The Differential Effects of Distance Learning and Presential Classroom Instructions on Performance of Male and Female Students of Science Education in Undergraduate Introductory Biology Course. In: Agrati, L.S., et al. Bridges and Mediation in Higher Distance Education. HELMeTO 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1344. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67435-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67435-9_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67434-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67435-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics