Skip to main content

A Novel Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple Attribute Decision Making Considering Reliability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1565 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1339))

Abstract

In actual decision-making, recognizing, analyzing, and reasoning is vital to solving problems in which information plays an important part. The evidential reasoning (ER) approach provides a great way to address multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problems, including qualitative and quantitative attributes, based on a distributed assessment framework. However, in the ER context, choosing the optimal schemes is based primarily on the aggregation of attributes’ distributed assessments. The consistency of assessments for each attribute is ignored, all that will affect the evaluation's reliability. This study puts forward a new model based on the ER to handle MADM problems, considering the consistency of attributes assessment. A reliable measure for assessments, calculated with the entropy, is figured out to represent the discrete degree of evaluating so that effectiveness and reliability and are both considered. A numerical example illustrates the decision-making process, and the properties of the new model are investigated. It is shown that the new approach is more reasonable and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yang, J.-B., Sen, P.: A general multi-level evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 24, 1458–2147 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L.: Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination. Artif. Intell. 205, 1–29 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, Y.M., Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L., et al.: The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 175, 35–66 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fu, C., Yang, S.L.: The conjunctive combination of interval-valued belief structures from dependent sources. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 53, 69–785 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, M.J., Wang, Y.M.: Hybrid evidential reasoning for decision making under uncertainty based on extension principle. Control Decis. 30, 670–676 (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, M.-J., Wang, Y.-M., Li, L.-H., et al.: A general evidential reasoning algorithm for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 257, 1005–1015 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Roselló, L., Sánchez, M., Agell, N., et al.: Using consensus and distances between generalized multi-attribute linguistic assessments for group decision-making. Inf. Fusion 17, 83–92 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan, H.B., Zhang, X., Li, Y.: Linguistic multi-attribute decision making with multiple priorities. Comput. Ind. Eng. 109, 15–27 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma, Z., Zhu, J., Chen, Y.: A probabilistic linguistic group decision-making method from a reliability perspective based on evidential reasoning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 50, 15 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xue, W., Xu, Z., Wang, H., et al.: Hazard assessment of landslide dams using the evidential reasoning algorithm with multi-scale hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Appl. Soft Comput. 79, 74–86 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M.K., Grover, N.: A generalized TOPSIS method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making considering different scenarios of attributes weight information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 369–387 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, L., Wang, Y.M., Martínez, L.: A group decision method based on prospect theory for emergency situations. Inf. Sci. 418–419, 119–135 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, Z.-X., Wang, L., Wang, Y.-M.: An emergency decision making method based on prospect theory for different emergency situations. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 9, 407–420 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vipin, B., Amit, R.K.: Describing decision bias in the newsvendor problem: a prospect theory model. Omega 82, 132–141 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kong, Z., Wang, L., Wu, Z.: Application of fuzzy soft set in decision making problems based on grey theory. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236, 1521–1530 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, G.-D., Yamaguchi, D., Nagai, M.: A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem. Math. Comput. Model. 46, 573–581 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maghrabie, H.F., Beauregard, Y., Schiffauerova, A.: Grey-based multi-criteria decision analysis approach: addressing uncertainty at complex decision problems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 146, 366–379 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng, J.J., Wang, J.Q., Zhang, H.Y., et al.: An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems with simplified neutrosophic sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 25, 336–346 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pramanik, S., Biswas, P., Giri, B.C.: Hybrid vector similarity measures and their applications to multi-attribute decision making under neutrosophic environment. Neural Comput. Appl. 28, 1–14 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Uluçay, V., Kılıç, A., Yıldız, İ., Şahin, M.: A new approach for multi-attribute decision-making problems in bipolar neutrosophic sets. Neutrosophic Sets Syst. 23, 142–159 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, Y., Xu, D.L., Yang, J.B., et al.: An evidential reasoning-based decision support system for handling customer complaints in mobile telecommunications. Knowl.-Based Syst. 162, 202–210 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, D.J., Wang, H.L.: Uncertain multi-attribute decision making method based on entropy and evidential reasoning approach. J. Comput. Appl. 31, 1308–1310, 1412 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Y.M., Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L.: Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174, 1885–1913 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y.-M., Taha, E.M.S.: Evidential reasoning approach for bridge condition assessment. Expert Syst. Appl. 34, 689–699 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-value mapping. Annu. Math. Stat. 38, 325–339 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China under Grant No. 17YJC630213, and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China under Grant No. 2017J01514.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meijing Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, M. (2021). A Novel Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple Attribute Decision Making Considering Reliability. In: Hassanien, AE., Chang, KC., Mincong, T. (eds) Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications. AMLTA 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1339. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69717-4_80

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics