Skip to main content

Understanding E-Mental Health for People with Depression: An Evaluation Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Depression is widespread and, despite a wide range of treatment options, causes considerable suffering and disease burden. Digital health interventions, including self-monitoring and self-management, are becoming increasingly important to offer e-mental health treatment and to support the recovery of people affected. SELFPASS is such an application designed for the individual therapy of patients suffering from depression. To gain more insights, this study aims to examine e-mental health treatment using the example of SELFPASS with two groups: healthy people and patients suffering from depression. The analysis includes the measurement of the constructs Usability, Trust, Task-Technology Fit, Attitude and Intention-to-use, the causal relationships between them and the differences between healthy and depressive participants as well as differences between participants’ evaluations at the beginning and at the end of the usage period. The results show that the Usability has the biggest influence on the Attitude and the Intention-to-use. Moreover, the study reveals clear differences between healthy and depressive participants and indicates the need for more efforts to improve compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hartmann, R., Sander, C., Lorenz, N., Böttger, D., Hegerl, U.: Utilization of patient-generated data collected through mobile devices: insights from a survey on attitudes toward mobile self-monitoring and self-management apps for depression. JMIR Mental Health 6(4), e11671 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2196/11671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bundespsychotherapeutenkammer BPtK: Ein Jahr nach der Reform der Psychotherapie-Richtlinie, Berlin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahadzadeh, A.S., Pahlevan Sharif, S., Ong, F.S., Khong, K.W.: Integrating health belief model and technology acceptance model: an investigation of health-related internet use. J. Med. Internet Res. 17(2), e45 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Radovic, A., Gmelin, T., Hua, J., Long, C., Stein, B.D., Miller, E.: Supporting our valued adolescents (SOVA), a social media website for adolescents with depression and/or anxiety: technological feasibility, usability, and acceptability study. JMIR Mental Health 5(1), e17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.9441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lutz, W., et al.: Defining and predicting patterns of early response in a web-based intervention for depression. J. Med. Internet Res. 19(6), e206 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andersson, G., Cuijpers, P., Carlbring, P., Riper, H., Hedman, E.: Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry Official J. World Psychiatr. Assoc. (WPA) 13(3), 288–295 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20151

  7. Harrison, R., Flood, D., Duce, D.: Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. J. Interact. Sci. 1(1), 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2194-0827-1-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kortum, P., Peres, S.C.: Evaluation of home health care devices: remote usability assessment. JMIR Hum. Factors 2(1), e10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.4570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cho, H., et al.: A mobile health intervention for HIV prevention among racially and ethnically diverse young men: usability evaluation. JMIR mHealth uHealth 6(9), e11450 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2196/11450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tseng, S., Fogg, B.J.: Credibility and computing technology. Commun. ACM 42(5), 39–44 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1145/301353.301402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mcknight, D.H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J.B., Clay, P.F.: Trust in a specific technology. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2(2), 1–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 4(1), 53–71 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 19(2), 213 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/249689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis, F.D.: A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Burney, S.M.A., Ali, S.A., Ejaz, A., Siddiqui, F.A.: Discovering the correlation between technology acceptance model and usability. IJCSNS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 17(11), 53–61 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dishaw, M.T., Strong, D.M.: Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs. Inf. Manage. 36(1), 9–21 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00101-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao, J., Fang, S., Jin, P.: Modeling and quantifying user acceptance of personalized business modes based on TAM, trust and attitude. Sustainability 10(2), 356 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Löwe, B., Kroenke, K., Herzog, W., Gräfe, K.: Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J. Affect. Disord. 81(1), 61–66 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Usability Evaluation in Industry, vol. 189, pp. 4–7 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, T.-C., Huang, C.-C.: Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: an integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit. Inf. Manage. 45(6), 410–417 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ajzen, I.: Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32(4), 665–683 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, X., Yu, P., Yan, J., Spil, I.T.A.M.: Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: a case study in a primary care clinic. BMC Health Serv. Res. 15, 71 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0726-2

  24. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Richter, N.F., Hauff, S.: Partial Least Squares Strukturgleichungsmodellierung. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Franz Vahlen, München (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Mena, J.A.: An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 40(3), 414–433 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(1), 115–135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tavakol, M., Dennick, R.: Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2, 53–55 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Blanca, M.J., Alarcón, R., Arnau, J., Bono, R., Bendayan, R.: Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema 29(4), 552–557 (2017). https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ryan, C., Bergin, M., Wells, J.S.G.: Theoretical perspectives of adherence to web-based interventions: a scoping review. Int. J. Behav. Med. 25(1), 17–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9678-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sherdell, L., Waugh, C.E., Gotlib, I.H.: Anticipatory pleasure predicts motivation for reward in major depression. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 121(1), 51–60 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., et al.: A mobile app-based intervention for depression: end-user and expert usability testing study. JMIR Mental Health 5(3), e54 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.9445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Good, A., Sambhanthan, A.: Accessing web based health care and resources for mental health: interface design considerations for people experiencing mental illness. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2014. LNCS, vol. 8519, pp. 25–33. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07635-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Stiles-Shields, C., Montague, E., Lattie, E.G., Schueller, S.M., Kwasny, M.J., Mohr, D.C.: Exploring user learnability and learning performance in an app for depression: usability study. JMIR Hum. Factors 4(3), e18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.7951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tiburcio, M., Lara, M.A., Aguilar Abrego, A., Fernández, M., Martínez Vélez, N., Sánchez, A.: Web-based intervention to reduce substance abuse and depressive symptoms in mexico: development and usability test. JMIR Mental Health 3(3), e47 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.6001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Montague, E.N.H., Kleiner, B.M., Winchester, W.W.: Empirically understanding trust in medical technology. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 39(4), 628–634 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: Understanding trust in medical technologies. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health : Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 22–23 March 2018. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications Lda, Setúbal (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Eivazzadeh, S., Berglund, J.S., Larsson, T.C., Fiedler, M., Anderberg, P.: Most influential qualities in creating satisfaction among the users of health information systems: study in seven European union countries. JMIR Med. Inform. 6(4), e11252 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2196/11252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Laugesen, J., Hassanein, K., Yuan, Y.: The impact of internet health information on patient compliance: a research model and an empirical study. J. Med. Internet Res. 17(6), e143 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cugelman, B.: Gamification: what it is and why it matters to digital health behavior change developers. JMIR Serious Games 1(1), e3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2196/games.3139

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Janine Blankenhagel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Blankenhagel, K.J., Werner, J., Mayer, G., Schultz, JH., Zarnekow, R. (2021). Understanding E-Mental Health for People with Depression: An Evaluation Study. In: Ye, J., O'Grady, M.J., Civitarese, G., Yordanova, K. (eds) Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare. MobiHealth 2020. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 362. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70569-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70569-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70568-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70569-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics