Skip to main content

Understanding Parachuting Collaboration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Diversity, Divergence, Dialogue (iConference 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12645))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1627 Accesses

Abstract

In contemporary times, collaborative research has become the cynosure of knowledge production and it is widely acknowledged as a means of improving research quality, high impact, and credence. This paper explores an interesting style of collaborative research in which researchers with no prior collaboration history, come together for the first time to produce a scientific article (parachuting collaboration). Based on the empirical analysis of \(\sim \)35.12 million articles in Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across 19 disciplines, we observed that parachuting collaboration has been dominating knowledge production and it has been prevalent in all the disciplines. A closer inspection revealed that there has been a consistent decrease in the parachuting collaboration in recent times. To investigate this behavior further, we analyzed all 19 disciplines in the MAG dataset and surprisingly, the percentage of decrease was not the same for all disciplines. In our study, we found that for the non-STEM disciplines, the decrease is comparatively lower than the STEM disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Axelrod, R., Hamilton, W.: The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489), 1390–1396 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, L.M., Gadlin, H.: Collaboration and team science. J. Invest. Med. 60(5), 768–775 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boschma, R.: Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg. Stud. 39(1), 61–74 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bu, Y., Ding, Y., Liang, X., Murray, D.S.: Understanding persistent scientific collaboration. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 69(3), 438–448 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cole, T., Teboul, J.B.: Non-zero-sum collaboration, reciprocity, and the preference for similarity: developing an adaptive model of close relational functioning. Pers. Relat. 11(2), 135–160 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frost-Arnold, K.: Moral trust & scientific collaboration. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part A 44(3), 301–310 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guimera, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., Amaral, L.A.N.: Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science 308, 697–702 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsiehchen, D., Espinoza, M., Hsieh, A.: Multinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative research. Sci. Adv. 1(8), e1500211 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lauto, G., Valentin, F.: How large-scale research facilities connect to global research. Rev. Policy Res. 30(4), 381–408 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, M., et al.: Can pandemics transform scientific novelty? evidence from COVID-19 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ponds, R., Oort, F.V., Frenken, K.: The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Pap. Reg. Sci. 86(3), 423–443 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Skilton, P.F., Dooley, K.J.: The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Acad. Manage. Rev. 35(1), 118–134 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tenzer, H., Pudelko, M.: The influence of language differences on power dynamics in multinational teams. J. World Bus. 52(1), 45–61 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomson, A.M., Perry, J.L.: Collaboration processes: inside the black box. Public Adm. Rev. 66(s1), 20–32 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Waltman, L., Tijssen, R.J.W., Eck, N.J.V.: Globalisation of science in kilometres. J. Informetr. 5(4), 574–582 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, L., Wang, D., Evans, J.A.: Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature 566(7744), 378–382 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng, A., Fan, Y., Di, Z., Wang, Y., Havlin, S.: The critical role of fresh teams in creating original and multi-disciplinary research (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.05985

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Jaiswal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jaiswal, A., Liu, M., Ding, Y. (2021). Understanding Parachuting Collaboration. In: Toeppe, K., Yan, H., Chu, S.K.W. (eds) Diversity, Divergence, Dialogue. iConference 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12645. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71292-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71292-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71291-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71292-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics