Skip to main content

On the Parameter Setting of the Penalty-Based Boundary Intersection Method in MOEA/D

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2021)

Abstract

Multiobjective optimization evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) decomposes an multiobjective optimization problem into a number of single-objective subproblems and solves them in a cooperative manner. The subproblems can be designed by various scalarization methods, e.g., the weighted sum (WS) method, the Tchebycheff (TCH) method, and the penalty-based boundary intersection (PBI) method. In this paper, we investigate the PBI method with different parameter settings, and propose a way to set the parameter appropriately. Experimental results suggest that the PBI method with our proposed parameter setting works very well.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11991023, 62076197, 61876163 and 62072364) and the Key Project of Science and Technology Innovation 2030 sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2018AAA0101301).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(F'\) may not be in the feasible objective region. But we are seeking for a common principle, so we have to take the situation into consideration where there is an MOP such that \(F'\) is in the feasible objective region.

References

  1. Beume, N., Naujoks, B., Emmerich, M.: SMS-EMOA: multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181(3), 1653–1669 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, L., Deb, K., Liu, H.L., Zhang, Q.: Effect of objective normalization and penalty parameter on penalty boundary intersection decomposition based evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithms. Evol. Comput. 29, 1–30 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Das, I., Dennis, J.E.: Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J. Optim. 8(3), 631–657 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K.: Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, vol. 16. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goh, C.J., Yang, X.Q.: Convexification of a noninferior frontier. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 97, 759–768 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022654528902

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo, J., Yang, S., Jiang, S.: An adaptive penalty-based boundary intersection approach for multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. In: 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 2145–2152 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ishibuchi, H., Doi, K., Nojima, Y.: Characteristics of many-objective test problems and penalty parameter specification in MOEA/D. In: 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1115–1122 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ishibuchi, H., Sakane, Y., Tsukamoto, N., Nojima, Y.: Adaptation of scalarizing functions in MOEA/D: an adaptive scalarizing function-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. In: Ehrgott, M., Fonseca, C.M., Gandibleux, X., Hao, J.-K., Sevaux, M. (eds.) EMO 2009. LNCS, vol. 5467, pp. 438–452. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01020-0_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, H., Zhang, Q.: Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13(2), 284–302 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Y., Ishibuchi, H., Masuyama, N., Nojima, Y.: Adapting reference vectors and scalarizing functions by growing neural gas to handle irregular Pareto fronts. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 24(3), 439–453 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miettinen, K.: Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. In: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. Springer, New York (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5563-6

  13. Ming, M., Wang, R., Zha, Y., Zhang, T.: Pareto adaptive penalty-based boundary intersection method for multi-objective optimization. Inf. Sci. 414, 158–174 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Sato, H.: Analysis of inverted PBI and comparison with other scalarizing functions in decomposition based MOEAs. J. Heuristics 21(6), 819–849 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-015-9301-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh, H.K., Deb, K.: Investigating the equivalence between PBI and AASF scalarization for multi-objective optimization. Swarm Evol. Comput. 53, 100630 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan, K.C., Khor, E.F., Lee, T.H.: Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications. Springer, London (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-132-6

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanabe, R., Ishibuchi, H.: An analysis of control parameters of MOEA/D under two different optimization scenarios. Appl. Soft Comput. 70, 22–40 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, C., Hu, C., Zou, Y.: PBI function based evolutionary algorithm with precise penalty parameter for unconstrained many-objective optimization. Swarm Evol. Comput. 50, 100568 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, S., Jiang, S., Jiang, Y.: Improving the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition with new penalty schemes. Soft Comput. 21(16), 4677–4691 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2076-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(6), 712–731 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zitzler, E., Künzli, S.: Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search. In: Yao, X., et al. (eds.) PPSN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3242, pp. 832–842. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30217-9_84

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingda Deng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Z., Deng, J., Zhang, Q., Yang, Q. (2021). On the Parameter Setting of the Penalty-Based Boundary Intersection Method in MOEA/D. In: Ishibuchi, H., et al. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12654. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72062-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72062-9_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72061-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72062-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics