Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Euro-Mediterranean Conference

EuroMed 2020: Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection pp 641–653Cite as

Digital 3D Modelling for Heritage Research and Education from an Information Studies Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

  • 2050 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12642))

Abstract

Since more than 30 years digital 3D modelling methods have been used to support research and education about heritage and history. While an investigation on these topics is usually done from a perspective of digital humanities and cultural heritage, I investigate this topic by employing information studies methods from scientometrics, user behaviour research, and information practices. This article shows research questions and key findings from 15 completed studies that are part of an ongoing postdoc thesis work. Incorporated studies report about scholarly communities, usage practices, methodologies, technologies as well as design implications and educational strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guidi, G., et al.: 2nd International Congress on Digital Heritage 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Georgopoulos, A.: CIPA’s perspectives on cultural heritage. In: Münster, S., et al. (eds.) 5th Conference on Digital Research and Education in Architectural Heritage, DECH 2017, and First Workshop, UHDL 2017, Dresden, Germany, 30–31 March 2017, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 215–245. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76992-9_13

  3. Francesco, G.D., et al.: Standards and guidelines for quality digital cultural three-dimensional content creation. In: VSMM 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Münster, S.: Workflows and the role of images for virtual 3D reconstruction of no longer extant historic objects. ISPRS Ann. Photogram. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. II-5/W1, 197–202 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W1-197-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold, D., et al.: EPOCH Research Agenda – Final Report (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Commission: Survey and outcomes of cultural heritage research projects supported in the context of EU environmental research programmes. From 5th to 7th Framework Programme (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frischer, B., Dakouri-Hild, A. (eds.): Beyond Illustration: 2D and 3D Digital Technologies as Tools for Discovery in Archaeology. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2008). https://doi.org/10.30861/9781407302928

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Bentkowska-Kafel, A., et al.: Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bentkowska-Kafel, A.: Mapping Digital Art History (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kohle, H.: Digitale Bildwissenschaft (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Granovetter, M.S.: Strength of the weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wasserman, S., et al.: Social Network Analysis (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Velden, T., et al.: Patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks in chemistry - mesoscopic analysis and interpretation. In: ISSI 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Velden, T., et al.: A new approach to analyzing patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks - mesoscopic analysis and interpretation. Scientometrics 85(1), 219–242 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Münster, S.: A survey on topics, researchers and cultures in the field of digital heritage. ISPRS Ann. Photogram. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. IV-2/W2, 157–162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W2-157-2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Münster, S.: Digital cultural heritage as scholarly field – topics, researchers and Perspectives from a bibliometric point of view. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 12(3), 22–49 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Wheatley, D., et al.: Spatial Technology and Archaeology. The Archaeological Applications of GIS (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. UNESCO: Charta zur Bewahrung des Digitalen Kulturerbes, verabschiedet von der 32. UNESCO-Generalkonferenz am, Paris, 17 Oktober 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. De Solla Price, D.: Little Science - Big Science. Columbia University Press, New York (1963)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Münster, S., et al.: The visual side of digital humanities. A survey on topics, researchers and epistemic cultures in visual digital humanities. Digit. Scholarsh. Humanit. 35(2), 366–389 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gläser, J., Laudel, G.: Experteninterviews. In: Gläser, J., Laudel, G. (eds.) Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, pp. 111–196. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91538-8_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Lamnek, S., Qualitative Sozialforschung. Lehrbuch (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bryant, A., et al.: The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schwaber, K.: Agile Project Management with Scrum (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chandler, P., et al.: Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cogn. Instr. 8(4), 293–332 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kröber, C., et al.: Educational app creation for the cathedral in freiberg. In: Spector, J.M., et al. (eds.) Competencies in Teaching, Learning and Educational Leadership in the Digital Age, pp. 303–318. Spinger, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30295-9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Günther, H.: Kritische Computer-Visualisierung in der kunsthistorischen Lehre. In: Frings, M. (ed.) Der Modelle Tugend, pp. 111–122. CAD und die neuen Räume der Kunstgeschichte, Weimar (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pfarr-Harfst, M.: Virtual scientific models. In: Ng, K., et al. (eds.): Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, EVA Conferences, London, pp. 157–163 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fleck, L.: Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 1. vol besucht am 10.1.2014 (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Latour, B., et al.: Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Knorr-Cetina, K.: Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Münster, S., Prechtel, N.: Beyond software. design implications for virtual libraries and platforms for cultural heritage from practical findings. In: Ioannides, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Fink, E., Žarnić, R., Yen, A.-Y., Quak, E. (eds.) EuroMed 2014. LNCS, vol. 8740, pp. 131–145. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13695-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Münster, S., Kuroczyński, P., Messemer, H.: Digital 3D reconstruction projects and activities in the German-speaking countries. In: Ioannides, M., Fink, E., Brumana, R., Patias, P., Doulamis, A., Martins, J., Wallace, M. (eds.) EuroMed 2018. LNCS, vol. 11196, pp. 599–606. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01762-0_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Fernie, K., et al.: 3D content in Europeana task force (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rigauts, T., et al.: Web-based platforms and metadata for 3D cultural heritage models: a critical review. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Agarwal, S., et al.: Building Rome in a day. Commun. ACM 54(10), 105 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision 60(2), 91–110 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Maiwald, F., Schneider, D., Henze, F., Münster, S., Niebling, F.: Feature matching of historical images based on geometry of quadrilaterals. ISPRS Ann. Photogram. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLII–2, 643–650 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Münster, S., et al.: Introducing an automated pipeline for a browser-based, city-scale mobile 4D VR application based on historical images. In: Paper Presented at the ACM Multimedia - SUMAC Workshop, Seattle (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Harrison, R., et al.: Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. J. Interact. Sci. 1(1), 1 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nielsen, J., et al.: Mobile Usability (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Münster, S.: Cultural heritage at a glance. Four case studies about the perception of digital architectural 3D models. In: Alonso, F. (ed.) 2018 3rd Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHERITAGE) held jointly with 2018 24th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM 2018). IEEE, San Francisco (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kuroczyński, P., et al.: Der Modelle Tugend 2.0 – Vom digitalen 3D-Datensatz zum wissenschaftlichen Informationsmodell (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Burri, R.V., et al.: Social studies of scientific imaging and visualization. In: Hackett, E.J., et al. (eds.) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 297–317. MIT Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Apollonio, F.I.: Classification schemes for visualization of uncertainty in digital hypothetical reconstruction. In: Münster, S., Pfarr-Harfst, M., Kuroczyński, P., Ioannides, M. (eds.) 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage II. LNCS, vol. 10025, pp. 173–197. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47647-6_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Digital Humanities, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Sander Muenster

Authors
  1. Sander Muenster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sander Muenster .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus

    Marinos Ioannides

  2. Arlington, VA, USA

    Eleanor Fink

  3. USI – Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland

    Lorenzo Cantoni

  4. Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

    Erik Champion

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Muenster, S. (2021). Digital 3D Modelling for Heritage Research and Education from an Information Studies Perspective. In: Ioannides, M., Fink, E., Cantoni, L., Champion, E. (eds) Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. EuroMed 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12642. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73043-7_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73043-7_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73042-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73043-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation