Skip to main content

Modeling the Emergence of Value and Risk in Game Theoretical Approaches

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Enterprise Engineering XIV (EEWC 2020)

Abstract

Game theory is largely about interactions of agents whose decisions affect each other. The combination of agents’ actions corresponds to outcomes, which may impact agents’ goals, either positively or negatively. The analysis of the probable consequences and expected utilities of all possible outcomes is fundamental to support agents when deciding whether to engage in a certain strategy. In this paper, we move in this direction by initiating the investigation of the ontological foundation of the emergence of value and risk from outcomes in game theoretical approaches. In order to understand the influence of these forces over outcomes, a precise and rigorous conceptualization, based on foundational ontologies, is needed. To this aim, we present and discuss here a preliminary ontological modeling of basic concepts of game theory, as well as the relation to value, risk and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A different strategy that avoids introducing future or possible events is to rephrase the model using types of actions and events, cf. [29].

  2. 2.

    This is compatible with the modeling of preferences according to UFO in [28].

References

  1. Almeida, J.P.A., Falbo, R.A., Guizzardi, G.: Events as entities in ontology-driven conceptual modeling. In: Laender, A.H.F., Pernici, B., Lim, E.-P., de Oliveira, J.P.M. (eds.) ER 2019. LNCS, vol. 11788, pp. 469–483. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Botti Benevides, A., Bourguet, J.R., Guizzardi, G., Peñaloza, R., Almeida, J.P.A.: Representing a reference foundational ontology of events in SROIQ. Appl. Ontol. 14(3), 293–334 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castelfranchi, C.: Commitments: from individual intentions to groups and organizations. In: 1st International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS), vol. 95, pp. 41–48 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cox Jr., L.A.: Game theory and risk analysis. Risk Anal. Int. J. 29(8), 1062–1068 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diamond, D.W., Dybvig, P.H.: Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. J. Polit. Econ. 91(3), 401–419 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Easley, D., Kleinberg, J., et al.: Networks, crowds, and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world. Significance 9, 43–44 (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fonseca, C.M., Porello, D., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guarino, N.: Relations in ontology-driven conceptual modeling. In: Laender, A.H.F., Pernici, B., Lim, E.-P., de Oliveira, J.P.M. (eds.) ER 2019. LNCS, vol. 11788, pp. 28–42. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. GhavamiFar, F., Taghiyareh, F., Razavi, M.: Game theory as a tool for converting risk to opportunity (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guarino, N.: Formal ontology in information systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference (FOIS 1998), Trento, Italy, 6–8 June, vol. 46. IOS Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guarino, N.: On the semantics of ongoing and future occurrence identifiers. In: Mayr, H.C., Guizzardi, G., Ma, H., Pastor, O. (eds.) ER 2017. LNCS, vol. 10650, pp. 477–490. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G., Mylopoulos, J.: On the philosophical foundations of conceptual models. Inf. Model. Knowl. Bases XXXI(321), 1 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Telematica Instituut/CTIT (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guizzardi, G., Falbo, R.A., Guizzardi, R.S.S.: Grounding software domain ontologies in the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO). In: 11th Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering (CIbSE), pp. 127–140 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guizzardi, G., Fonseca, C.M., Benevides, A.B., Almeida, J.P.A., Porello, D., Sales, T.P.: Endurant types in ontology-driven conceptual modeling: towards OntoUML 2.0. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 136–150. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, R.S.S.: Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) story. Appl. Ontol. 10(3–4), 259–271 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., de Almeida Falbo, R., Guizzardi, R.S.S., Almeida, J.P.A.: Towards ontological foundations for the conceptual modeling of events. In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol. 8217, pp. 327–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Guizzardi, R.S.S., Guizzardi, G.: Ontology-based transformation framework from TROPOS to AORML. In: Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering, pp. 547–570. The MIT Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ISO: Risk Management - Vocabulary. Standard, International Organization for Standardization (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. ISO: Risk Management - Guidelines. Standard, International Organization for Standardization (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jarzabkowski, P., Wilson, D.C.: Actionable strategy knowledge: a practice perspective. Eur. Manag. J. 24(5), 348–367 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kambil, A., Ginsberg, A., Bloch, M.: Re-inventing value propositions. Information Systems Working Papers Series (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lanning, M.J., Michaels, E.G.: A business is a value delivery system. McKinsey Staff Paper 41(July) (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  23. McKelvey, R.D., McLennan, A.M., Turocy, T.L.: Gambit: software tools for game theory (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Myerson, R.: Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Payolo, A.R.: A toilet paper run is like a bank run. The economic fixes are about the same. The Conversation, March 2020. https://theconversation.com/a-toilet-paper-run-is-like-a-bank-run-the-economic-fixes-are-about-the-same-133065

  27. Peterson, M.: An Introduction to Decision Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Porello, D., Guizzardi, G.: Towards an ontological modelling of preference relations. In: Ghidini, C., Magnini, B., Passerini, A., Traverso, P. (eds.) AI*IA 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11298, pp. 152–165. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03840-3_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Porello, D., Guizzardi, G., Sales, T.P., Amaral, G.: A core ontology for economic exchanges. In: Dobbie, G., Frank, U., Kappel, G., Liddle, S.W., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) ER 2020. LNCS, vol. 12400, pp. 364–374. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Rajbhandari, L., Snekkenes, E.A.: Mapping between classical risk management and game theoretical approaches. In: De Decker, B., Lapon, J., Naessens, V., Uhl, A. (eds.) CMS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7025, pp. 147–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24712-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Rass, S.: On game-theoretic risk management (part three)-modeling and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00708 (2017)

  32. Sales, T.P., Almeida, J.P.A., Santini, S., Baião, F., Guizzardi, G.: Ontological analysis and redesign of risk modeling in ArchiMate. In: 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pp. 154–163. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sales, T.P., Baião, F., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guarino, N., Mylopoulos, J.: The common ontology of value and risk. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 121–135. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Sales, T.P., Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G., Mylopoulos, J.: An ontological analysis of value propositions. In: 21st IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pp. 184–193. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sales, T.P., Roelens, B., Poels, G., Guizzardi, G., Guarino, N., Mylopoulos, J.: A pattern language for value modeling in ArchiMate. In: Giorgini, P., Weber, B. (eds.) CAiSE 2019. LNCS, vol. 11483, pp. 230–245. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21290-2_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Savani, R., von Stengel, B.: Game theory explorer: software for the applied game theorist. Comput. Manag. Sci. 12(1), 5–33 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Shoham, Y., Leyton-Brown, K.: Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun, S., Sun, N.: The fundamentals of non-cooperative games. In: Sun, S., Sun, N. (eds.) Management Game Theory, pp. 1–21. Springer, Singapore (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1062-1_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. The Open Group: ArchiMate 3.0.1 Specification. Standard C179 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Verdonck, M., Gailly, F.: Insights on the use and application of ontology and conceptual modeling languages in ontology-driven conceptual modeling. In: Comyn-Wattiau, I., Tanaka, K., Song, I.-Y., Yamamoto, S., Saeki, M. (eds.) ER 2016. LNCS, vol. 9974, pp. 83–97. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46397-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Watson, J.: Strategy: an Introduction to Game Theory, vol. 139. WW Norton New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to Multiagent Systems. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

CAPES (PhD grant 88881.173022/2018-01) and NeXON project (UNIBZ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenda Amaral .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Amaral, G., Porello, D., Sales, T.P., Guizzardi, G. (2021). Modeling the Emergence of Value and Risk in Game Theoretical Approaches. In: Aveiro, D., Guizzardi, G., Pergl, R., Proper, H.A. (eds) Advances in Enterprise Engineering XIV. EEWC 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 411. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74196-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74196-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74195-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74196-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics