Skip to main content

Towards a Hybrid Process Modeling Language

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1248 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 415))

Abstract

Nowadays, business process management is getting more and more important. A wide variety of process modeling languages is available. Hence one of the most complicated tasks of entrepreneurs is to choose the modeling language which suits their respective problems and purposes best. Each of the modeling languages has its own advantages and disadvantages depending on the properties of the process to be modeled. None of the existing approaches satisfies requirements for a “good” modeling language completely. Thus, we formulate our goal to develop a new concept for a hybrid modeling language based on BPMN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.camunda.com.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.: Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0, January 2011

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burattin, A., Maggi, F.M., Sperduti, A.: Conformance checking based on multi-perspective declarative process models. Expert Syst. Appl. 65, 194–211 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Slaats, T., Schunselaar, D.M.M., Maggi, F.M., Reijers, H.A.: The semantics of hybrid process models. In: Debruyne, C., et al. (eds.) OTM 2016. LNCS, vol. 10033, pp. 531–551. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48472-3_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Smedt, J.D., Weerdt, J.D., Vanthienen, J., Poels, G.: Mixed-paradigm process modeling with intertwined state spaces. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 58(1), 19–29 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stachowiak, H.: Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Springer, New York (1973)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, J.-W., Zhang, J.: Comparing text-based and graphic user interfaces for novice and expert users. In: AMIA ... Annual Symposium Proceedings/AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium, vol. 11, pp. 125–129, February 2007

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolai Schützenmeier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schützenmeier, N., Jablonski, S., Schönig, S. (2021). Towards a Hybrid Process Modeling Language. In: Cherfi, S., Perini, A., Nurcan, S. (eds) Research Challenges in Information Science. RCIS 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 415. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75018-3_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75018-3_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75017-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75018-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics