Skip to main content

From Incomplete to Complete Networks in Asynchronous Byzantine Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 225))

Abstract

This paper presents a simple broadcast operation suited to n-process asynchronous message-passing systems in which (i) up to t processes may commit Byzantine faults, and (2), while the underlying communication network is connected (any pair of processes is connected by a path), not all the pairs of processes are directly connected by a communication channel. The algorithm proposed to implement this operation assumes (i) \(t<n/3\) and (ii) \((2t+1)\)-vertex connectivity of the underlying network (each pair of processes is connected by at least \((2t+1)\) disjoint paths), requirements which are shown to be necessary. When considering incomplete networks, this abstraction can be used as the first level of a software stack on top of which, without any modifications, Byzantine-tolerant broadcast and agreement abstractions designed for fully connected networks can directly be used. The paper has also a short survey flavor from a “failure-tolerant broadcast abstractions” point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Disjoint” means that the only vertices (processes) shared by any two of these paths are their first and last processes.

  2. 2.

    Actually total order broadcast and consensus are equivalent problems in the sense any of them can be solved on top of the other one [6].

  3. 3.

    An application message is a message sent by the reliable broadcast abstraction, while a protocol message is a message used to implement reliable broadcast.

  4. 4.

    Deterministic algorithms implementing Byzantine multivalued consensus on top of Byzantine binary consensus in asynchronous fully connected networks are described in [2, 18, 20].

References

  1. Ben-Or, M.: Another advantage of free choice: completely asynchronous agreement protocols. In: Proceedings 2nd ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC’83), pp. 27–30. ACM Press (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Or, M., Kelmer, B., Rabin, T.: Asynchronous secure computations with optimal resilience. In: Proceedings of 13th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC’94), pp. 183–192. ACM Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bracha, G.: Asynchronous Byzantine agreement protocols. Inf. Comput. 75(2), 130–143 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bracha, G., Toueg, S.: Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. J. ACM 32(4), 824–840 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cachin, Ch., Guerraoui, R., Rodrigues, L.: Reliable and Secure Distributed Programming, 367 p. Springer, ISBN 978-3-642-15259-7 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chandra, T.D., Toueg, S.: Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems. J. ACM 43(2), 225–267 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dolev, D.: Unanimity in an unknown and unreliable environment. In: Proceedings of 22nd ACM Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOSC’81), pp. 159–168. ACM Press (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dolev, D.: The Byzantine general strike again. J. Algorithms 3, 14–30 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dolev, D., Dwork, C., Stockmeyer, L.: On the minimal synchronism needed for distributed consensus. J. ACM 34(1), 77–97 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. JACM 32(2), 374–382 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadzilacos, V., Toueg, S.: A Modular Approach to Fault-Tolerant Broadcasts and Related Problems. Technical report 94-1425, 83 p. Cornell University (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Imbs, D., Raynal, M.: Trading \(t\)-resilience for efficiency in asynchronous Byzantine reliable broadcast. Parallel Process. Lett. 26(4), 8 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lamport, L.: Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system. Commun. ACM 21(7), 558–565 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamport L., Shostack R., Pease M.: The Byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans. Programm. Lang. Syst. 4(3), 382–401 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Menger, K.: Zur allgemeinen kurventheorie. Fundamentae Mathematicae 10, 96–115 (1927)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mostéfaoui, A., Moumen, H., Raynal, M., Signature-free asynchronous binary Byzantine consensus with \(t<n/3\), \(O(n^2)\) messages, and \(O(1)\) expected time. J. ACM 62(4), Article 31, 21 pages (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mostéfaoui, A., Raynal, M.: Intrusion-tolerant broadcast and agreement abstractions in the presence of Byzantine processes. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 27(4), 1085–1098 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mostéfaoui, A., Raynal, M.: Signature-free asynchronous Byzantine systems: from multivalued to binary consensus with \(t<n/3\), \(O(n^2)\) messages, and constant time. Acta Informatica 54(5), 501–520 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Pease, M., Shostak, R., Lamport, L.: Reaching agreement in the presence of faults. J. ACM 27, 228–234 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Raynal, M.: Fault-tolerant message-passing distributed systems: an algorithmic approach. Springer, 480 p, ISBN: 978-3-319-94140-0 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Toueg, S.: Randomized Byzantine agreement. In: Proceedings of 3rd Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC’84), pp. 163–178. ACM Press (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the reviewers for their constructive comments. This work was partially supported by the French ANR projects DESCARTES (16-CE40-0023-03) devoted to layered and modular structures in distributed computing, and ByBLosS (20-CE25-0002-01) devoted to the design of modular building blocks for large-scale trustless multi-users applications.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Raynal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Raynal, M., Cao, J. (2021). From Incomplete to Complete Networks in Asynchronous Byzantine Systems. In: Barolli, L., Woungang, I., Enokido, T. (eds) Advanced Information Networking and Applications. AINA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 225. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75100-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics