Abstract
Understanding the visitor experience is critical for exhibit designers. Interactive exhibits should engage visitors into meaningful and compelling science learning conversations. However, exhibit design is a complex endeavor, particularly because many factors are interrelated and because of its subjective and dynamic nature. A body of research has addressed this subject from different perspectives over the last two decades. Nonetheless, most of the conceptual and practical contributions have used an under-articulated conceptualization of the visitor experience. This paper attempts to clarify experience in interactive exhibits based on a systematic empirical and theoretical research on the topic. Building on a literature review-based framework, we conducted a card sorting technique to sixteen expert exhibit designers. The seven core concepts that emerged represent a general expert mental model and serve to provide a holistic and articulated perspective of experiential exhibit design. This work can serve as a future reference to develop methods and tools for the design of experience-centered exhibits.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Falk, J.H., Scott, C., Dierking, L., Rennie, L., Jones, M.C.: Interactives and visitor learning. Curator Museum J. 47(2), 171–198 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00116.x
Perry, D.: What Makes Learning Fun? Principles for the Design of Intrinsically Motivating Museum Exhibits. Rowman Altamira, Lanham (2012)
Ansbacher, T.: Experience, inquiry, and making meaning. Exhibitionist 18(2), 22–26 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2002.tb00052.x
Macdonald, S.: Interconnecting: museum visiting and exhibition design. CoDesign 3(S1), 149–162 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701311502
Roberts, T.: Interpretation design: an integrative, interdisciplinary practice. Museum Soc. 12(3), 191–209 (2014)
McCarthy, J., Ciolfi, L.: Place as dialogue: understanding and supporting the museum experience. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 14(3), 247–267 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250801953736
Pekarik, A., Button, K., Doering, Z., Sharbaugh, A., Sutton, J.: Developing Interactive Exhibitions at the Smithsonian. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC (2002)
Ocampo-Agudelo, J., Maya, J.: Experiential qualities of science museum exhibits: a thematic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vancouver, Canada (2017)
Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A.W., Feder, M.A.: Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. The National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2009). https://doi.org/10.17226/12190
Dancstep, T., Sindorf, L.: Exhibit Designs for Girls’ Engagement: A Guide to the EDGE Design Attributes. The Exploratorium, San Francisco (2016)
Bitgood, S.: An Attention-Value Model of Museum Visitors. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education, Washington, DC (2010)
Humphrey, T., Gutwill, J. (eds.): Fostering Active Prolonged Engagement. The Exploratorium, San Francisco (2005)
Haywood, N., Cairns, P.: Engagement with an interactive museum exhibit. In: People and Computers XIX–The Bigger Picture, pp. 113–129 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_8
Ansbacher, T.: On making exhibits engaging and interesting. Curator Museum J. 45(3), 167–173 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2002.tb00052.x
Ansbacher, T.: What are we learning? Outcomes of the museum experience. Inf. Learn. Rev. 53(1), 4–7 (2002)
Allen, S., et al.: Framework for evaluating impacts of informal science education projects. In: Report from a National Science Foundation Workshop. The National Science Foundation, Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (2008)
Beghetto, R.A.: The exhibit as planned versus the exhibit as experienced. Curator Museum J. 57(1), 1–4 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12047
Lake-Hammond, A., Waite, N.: Exhibition design: bridging the knowledge gap. Des. J. 13(1), 77–98 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2752/146069210X12580336766400
McLean, K.: Museum exhibitions and the dynamics of dialogue. Daedalus 128(3), 83–107 (1999)
Young, D.L.: A phenomenological investigation of science center exhibition developers’ expertise development. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (2012)
Roppola, T.: Designing for the Museum Visitor Experience. Routledge, London (2013)
Cross, N.: Expertise in design: an overview. Des. Stud. 25(5), 427–441 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002
Harteis, C., Billett, S.: Intuitive expertise: theories and empirical evidence. Edu. Res. Rev. 9, 145–157 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.001
National Research Council. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. National Academies Press (2000)
Mathieu, J.E., Heffner, T.S., Goodwin, G.F., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A.: The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 85(2), 273 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
Rouse, W.B., Morris, N.M.: On looking into the black box: prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychol. Bull. 100(3), 349–363 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.349
Fincher, S., Tenenberg, J.: Making sense of card sorting data. Expert Syst. 22(3), 89–93 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0394.2005.00299.x
Toker, S., Moseley, J.L.: The mental model comparison of expert and novice performance improvement practitioners. Perform. Improv. Quart. 26(3), 7–32 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21152
Jabareen, Y.: Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. Int. J. Qual. Methods 8(4), 49–62 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406
Creswell, J.W., Miller, D.L.: Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theor. Pract. 39(3), 124–130 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Jonsen, K., Jehn, K.A.: Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies. Qual. Res. Organ. Manage. Int. J. 4(2), 123–150 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640910978391
Bedwell, W.L., Pavlas, D., Heyne, K., Lazzara, E.H., Salas, E.: Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning an empirical study. Simul. Gaming 43(6), 729–760 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878112439444
Spencer, D.: Card Sorting: Designing Usable Categories. Rosenfeld Media, New York (2009)
Tullis, T., Wood, L.: How many users are enough for a card-sorting study? In: Proceedings UPA 2004 (2004)
Righi, C., James, J., Beasley, M., Day, D.L., Fox, J.E., Gieber, J., Howe, C., Ruby, L.: Card sort analysis best practices. J. Usabil. Stud. 8(3), 69–89 (2013)
Hein, G.E.: Learning in the Museum. Routledge, London (2002)
Falk, J., Storksdieck, M.: Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Sci. Educ. 89(5), 744–778 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20078
Hein, G.E.: Museum education. a companion to museum studies. In: Macdonald, S. (ed.) pp. 340–352 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996836.ch20
Falk, J.H., Dierking, L.D.: Museum Experience Revisited. Left Coast Press (2012)
Allen, S.: Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Sci. Educ. 88(S1), S17–S33 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20016
Witcomb, A.: Interactivity: thinking beyond. A companion to museum studies. In: Macdonald, S. (ed.) vol. 39, pp. 353–361 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996836.ch21
Adams, M., Luke, J., Moussouri, T.: Interactivity: Moving beyond terminology. Curator: The Museum Journal, vol. 47, nº 2, pp. 155–170 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00115.x
Hennes, T.: Rethinking the visitor experience: Transforming obstacle into purpose. Curator Museum J. 45(2), 109–121 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2002.tb01185.x
Falk, J.H., Scott, C., Dierking, L., Rennie, L., Jones, M.C.: Interactives and visitor learning. Curator Museum J. 47(2), 171–198 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00116.x
Heath, C., Vom Lehn, D.: Configuring ‘interactivity’ enhancing engagement in science centres and museums. Soc. Stud. Sci. 38(1), 63–91 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707084152
Borun, M., Chambers, M.B., Dritsas, J., Johnson, J.I.: Enhancing family learning through exhibits. Curator Museum J. 40(4), 279–295 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1997.tb01313.x
Barriault, C., Pearson, D.: Assessing exhibits for learning in science centers: a practical tool. Visit. Stud. 13(1), 90–106 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/10645571003618824
Hein, G.E.: John Dewey’s “Wholly Original Philosophy” and its significance for museums. Curator Museum J. 49(2), 181–203 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00211.x
Rennie, L.J., Johnston, D.J.: The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums. Sci. Educ. 88(S1), S4–S16 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20017
Whitton, N., Moseley, A.: Deconstructing engagement rethinking involvement in learning. Simul. Gaming 45(4–5), 433–449 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114554755
Bevan, B., et al.: Making Science Matter: Collaborations Between Informal Science Education Organizations and Schools. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education, Washington, DC (2010)
Kamolpattana, S., Chen, G., Sonchaeng, P., Wilkinson, C., Willey, N., Bultitude, K.: Thai visitors’ expectations and experiences of explainer interaction within a science museum context. Publ. Underst. Sci. 24(1), 69–85 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514525560
Hooper-Greenhill, E.: Developing a Scheme for Finding Evidence of the Outcomes and Impact of Learning in Museums, Archives and Libraries: the Conceptual Framework. Research Centre for Museums and Galleries, Leicester, Uk (2002)
Falk, J.H., Dierking, L.D., Adams, M.: Living in a learning society: museums and free-choice learning. A companion to museum studies. In: Macdonald, S. (ed.) pp. 323–339 (2006)
Dewey, J.: Experience and Education, 1997th edn. Touchstone, New York (1938)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ocampo-Agudelo, J., Maya, J. (2021). Core Concepts Linking Exhibit Design and the Visitor Experience in Science Centers: An Early Framework. In: Rauterberg, M. (eds) Culture and Computing. Design Thinking and Cultural Computing. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12795. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77431-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77431-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77430-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77431-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)