Skip to main content

Hybrid Predictive Modelling for Finding Optimal Multipurpose Multicomponent Therapy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science – ICCS 2021 (ICCS 2021)

Abstract

This study presents a new hybrid approach to predictive modelling of disease dynamics for finding optimal therapy. We use existing methods, such as expert-based modelling methods, models of system dynamics and ML methods in compositions together with our proposed modelling methods for simulating treatment process and predicting treatment outcomes depending on the different therapy types. Treatment outcomes include a set of treatment-goal values, therapy types include a combination of drugs and treatment procedures. Personal therapy recommendation by this approach is optimal in terms of achieving the best treatment multipurpose outcomes. We use this approach in the task of creating a practical tool for finding optimal therapy for T2DM disease. The proposed tool was validated using surveys of experts, clinical recommendations [1], and classic metrics for predictive task. All these validations have shown that the proposed tool is high-quality, interpretable and usability, therefore it can be used as part of the Decision Support System for medical specialists who work with T2DM patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dedov, I.I., et al.: Standards of specialized diabetes care. In: Dedov, I.I., Shestakova M.V., Mayorov A.Yu Diabetes Mellit, 9th ed. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar, A.: Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in sepsis and septic shock. Crit. Care Clin. 25, 733–751 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Srividya, P., Devi, T.S.R., Gunasekaran, S.: Ftir spectral study on diabetic blood samples – monotherapy and combination therapy. Ojp 25, 744–750 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sicklick, J.K., et al.: Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study. Nat. Med. 30, 289–299 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burgmaier, M., Heinrich, C., Marx, N.: Cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 and GLP-1-based therapies: implications for the cardiovascular continuum in diabetes? Diab. Med. 30, 289–299 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Menden, M.P., et al.: Machine Learning Prediction of Cancer Cell Sensitivity to Drugs Based on Genomic and Chemical Properties. PLoS One 8, e61318 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khaledi, A., et al.: Predicting antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa with machine learning-enabled molecular diagnostics. EMBO Mol. Med. 12, e10264 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barbieri, C., et al.: A new machine learning approach for predicting the response to anemia treatment in a large cohort of End Stage Renal Disease patients undergoing dialysis. Comput. Biol. Med. 61, 56–61 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Janizek, J.D., Celik, S., Lee, S.I.: Explainable machine learning prediction of synergistic drug combinations for precision cancer medicine. bioRxiv 8, 1-115 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Preuer, K., Lewis, R., Hochreiter, S., Bender, A., Bulusu, K., Klambauer, G.: DeepSynergy: predicting anti-cancer drug synergy with Deep Learning. Bioinformatics 34(9), 1538–1546 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tabl, A., Alkhateeb, A., Pham, H., Rueda, L., ElMaraghy, W., Ngom, A.: A novel approach for identifying relevant genes for breast cancer survivability on specific therapies. Evol. Bioinf. 14, 117693431879026 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuenzi, B., et al.: Predicting drug response and synergy using a deep learning model of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell 38(5), 672-684.e6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2020.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Butler, J., Januzzi, J.L., Rosenstock, J.: Management of heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Maximizing complementary drug therapy. Diab. Obes. Metab. 22, 1243–1262 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bajusz, D., Rácz, A., Héberger, K.: Why is Tanimoto index an appropriate choice for fingerprint-based similarity calculations? J. Cheminf. 7(1), 1–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 20–31-70001. Participation in the ICCS conference was supported by the NWO Science Diplomacy Fund project # 483.20.038 ‘‘Russian-Dutch Collaboration in Computational Science’’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilia V. Derevitskii .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pavlovskii, V.V., Derevitskii, I.V., Kovalchuk, S.V. (2021). Hybrid Predictive Modelling for Finding Optimal Multipurpose Multicomponent Therapy. In: Paszynski, M., Kranzlmüller, D., Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Dongarra, J.J., Sloot, P.M. (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2021. ICCS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12744. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77967-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77967-2_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77966-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77967-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics