Skip to main content

A Probabilistic Framework for Modeling the Variability Across Federated Datasets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI 2021)

Abstract

We propose a novel federated learning paradigm to model data variability among heterogeneous clients in multi-centric studies. Our method is expressed through a hierarchical Bayesian latent variable model, where client-specific parameters are assumed to be realization from a global distribution at the master level, which is in turn estimated to account for data bias and variability across clients. We show that our framework can be effectively optimized through expectation maximization over latent master’s distribution and clients’ parameters. We tested our method on the analysis of multi-modal medical imaging data and clinical scores from distributed clinical datasets of patients affected by Alzheimer’s disease. We demonstrate that our method is robust when data is distributed either in iid and non-iid manners: it allows to quantify the variability of data, views and centers, while guaranteeing high-quality data reconstruction as compared to the state-of-the-art autoencoding models and federated learning schemes.

Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf

This work received financial support by the French government, through the 3IA Côte d’Azur Investments in the Future project managed by the National Research Agency (ANR) with the reference number ANR-19-P3IA-0002, and by the ANR JCJC project Fed-BioMed, ref. num. 19-CE45-0006-01. The authors are grateful to the OPAL infrastructure from Université Côte D’Azur for providing resources and support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://gdpr-info.eu/.

  2. 2.

    The ADNI project was launched in 2003 as a public-private partnership, led by Principal Investigator Michael W. Weiner, MD. The primary goal of ADNI was to test whether serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), other biological markers, and clinical and neuropsychological assessments can be combined to measure the progression of early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (see www.adni-info.org for up-to-date information).

References

  1. Antelmi, L., Ayache, N., Robert, P., Lorenzi, M.: Sparse multi-channel variational autoencoder for the joint analysis of heterogeneous data. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 97, 9-15 June 2019, Long Beach, California, USA, pp. 302–311. PMLR (2019). http://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/antelmi19a.html

  2. Argelaguet, R., et al.: Multi-omics factor analysis-a framework for unsupervised integration of multi-omics data sets. Mol. Syst. Biol. 14(6), e8124 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chassang, G.: The impact of the EU general data protection regulation on scientific research. Ecancermedical sci. 11, (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cunningham, J.P., Ghahramani, Z.: Linear dimensionality reduction: survey, insights, and generalizations. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 16(1), 2859–2900 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gelman, A., Hwang, J., Vehtari, A.: Understanding predictive information criteria for bayesian models. Stat. Comput. 24(6), 997–1016 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Iyengar, A., Kundu, A., Pallis, G.: Healthcare informatics and privacy. IEEE Internet Comput. 22(2), 29–31 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal components in regression analysis. In: Principal component analysis, pp. 129–155. Springer, New York (1986) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1904-8_8

  8. Kalter, J., Sweegers, M.G., Verdonck-de Leeuw, I.M., Brug, J., Buffart, L.M.: Development and use of a flexible data harmonization platform to facilitate the harmonization of individual patient data for meta-analyses. BMC Res. Notes 12(1), 164 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kingma, D.P., Welling, M.: Stochastic gradient VB and the variational auto-encoder. In: Second International Conference on Learning Representations. In: ICLR, vol. 19 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klami, A., Virtanen, S., Kaski, S.: Bayesian canonical correlation analysis. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 14, 965–1003 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, T., Sahu, A.K., Talwalkar, A., Smith, V.: Federated learning: challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 37(3), 50–60 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, T., Sahu, A.K., Zaheer, M., Sanjabi, M., Talwalkar, A., Smith, V.: Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.06127 (2018)

  13. Matsuura, T., Saito, K., Ushiku, Y., Harada, T.: Generalized bayesian canonical correlation analysis with missing modalities. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)(2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., y Arcas, B.A.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 1273–1282. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shen, L., Thompson, P.M.: Brain imaging genomics: integrated analysis and machine learning. Proc. IEEE 108(1), 125–162 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tipping, M.E., Bishop, C.M.: Probabilistic principal component analysis. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Statistical Methodology) 61(3), 611–622 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Triastcyn, A., Faltings, B.: Federated learning with bayesian differential privacy. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 2587–2596. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, Y., Yao, H., Zhao, S.: Auto-encoder based dimensionality reduction. Neurocomputing 184, 232–242 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yurochkin, M., Agarwal, M., Ghosh, S., Greenewald, K., Hoang, N., Khazaeni, Y.: Probabilistic federated neural matching (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Balelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Balelli, I., Silva, S., Lorenzi, M., for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2021). A Probabilistic Framework for Modeling the Variability Across Federated Datasets. In: Feragen, A., Sommer, S., Schnabel, J., Nielsen, M. (eds) Information Processing in Medical Imaging. IPMI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12729. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78191-0_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78191-0_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78190-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78191-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics