Skip to main content

Research on the Influence of Team Members with Different Creativity Levels and Academic Background on the Collaborative Design Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design, User Experience, and Usability: UX Research and Design (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12779))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3853 Accesses

Abstract

This study will use quantitative research methods to explore the impact of the creativity and professional background of collaborative design team members on the design process development. Two experiments were carried out. First, First, subjects with different academic backgrounds were selected to participate in the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). According to the test results, the subjects were divided into high, medium and low levels of creativity. Secondly, select 2 subjects at each level and set up a 6 members team to carry out a design task. Then we collect the semantic information in the experimental activities, and encode the data in time series, by structurally representing the data and information in the form of linkography, and analyze the link situation of each node and bring the node link data into the T-code parse algorithm, calculate the complexity, information (information content) and entropy data of every node. Finally, the team members’ performance in the design process is evaluated from multiple dimensions according to the fluctuations and changes of experimental data.

The results showed that the level of creativity was positively related to the role of team members in collaborative design activities. In addition, teams with the same background are better than groups with different backgrounds in terms of fluency in the design process, conceptual evolution, and design direction and goals. However, from the development trend of the whole design stage, the team with different backgrounds has great development potential, and its design fluency tends to improve gradually, which is better than those with the same background in design divergence, novelty of design concept and design information implication.

This research provides a visual reference for the study of complex design activities, improves the efficiency of design cognitive computing research, and lays a foundation for future design research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kaufman, J.C., Sternberg, R.J.: The International Handbook of Creativity, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 323–324. Cambridge University Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christiaans, H.H.C.M.: Creativity as a design criterion. Creat. Res. J. 14(1), 41–54 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarkar, P., Chakrabarti, A.: Assessing design creativity. Des. Stud. 32(4), 348–383 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hennessey, B.A., Amabile, T.M.: Creativity. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 61, 569–598 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Isaksen, S.G., Lauer, K.J., Ekvall, G.: Situational outlook questionnaire: a measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychol. Rep. 85(10), 665–674 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou, Y., Zhang, J.: A Preliminary Study on the index system of high-tech Enterprise creativity evaluation. Econ. Forum 11, 80–83 (2007). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goel, V.: Sketches of Thought, pp. 1–25. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Coyne, R.: Wicked problems revisited. Des. Stud. 26(1), 5–17 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alexander, C.: Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gero, J.S.: Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Mag. 11(4), 26–36 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mcluhan, M., Lapham, L.H.: Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man. The Mit Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clemmensen, T., Campos, P., Orngreen, R., Pejtersen, A.M., Wong, W. (eds.): HWID 2006. IIFIP, vol. 221. Springer, Boston (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36792-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Heylighen, A., Nijs, G.: Designing in the absence of sight: design cognition re-articulated. Des. Stud. 35(2), 113–132 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, H., Liu, X., Tang, M., Frazer, J.H.: Supporting creative configuration design in a computer-aided design environment. J. Comput. Aided Des. Comput. Graph. 15(10), 1258–1262+1335–1336 (2003) (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dorta, T., Prez, E., Lesage, A.: The ideation gap: hybrid tools, design flow and practice. Des. Stud. 29(2), 121–141 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rahimian, F.P., Ibrahim, R.: Impacts of VR 3D sketching on novice designers’ spatial cognition in collaborative conceptual architectural design. Des. Stud. 32(3), 255–291 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. J. Mark. Res. 23(3), 306–307 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zamenopoulos, T.: Design out of complexity: a mathematical theory of design as an universal property of organization. University College London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, C.: Cognition Design: Cognitive Science in Design. China Building Industry Press, Sichuan (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cross, N.: Expertise in design: an overview. Des. Stud. 25(5), 427–441 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, J., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Ou, X.: The multidimensional modeling method of design cognition based on semantic link. J. Mech. Eng. 53(15), 32–39 (2017). (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lissitz, R.W., Willhoft, J.L.: A methodological study of the Torrance Tests of Creativity. J. Educ. Meas. 22, 1–111 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, J.J., Gao, Q.D., Wang, J.R., et al.: The Torrance tests of creative thinking norms-technical manual figural forms A, pp. 1–64. Yuan Liu Publishing, Taiwan (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goldschmidt, G.: Linkography: assessing design productivity. Cybern. Syst. 291–298 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Titchener, M.R.: Deterministic computation of string complexity, information and entropy. In: IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Titchener, M.R., Nicolescu, R., Staiger, L., et al.: Deterministic complexity and entropy. Fund. Inform. 64(1–4), 443–461 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. EL-Khouly, T.: Creative discovery in architectural design processes: an empirical study of procedural and contextual components. London University, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, Z., Zhou, M., Liu, X.: The impact of different levels of creative thinking members in group collaboration based on semantic link. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S., Choplin, A. (eds.) IHIET 2019. AISC, vol. 1018, pp. 240–246. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Z., Zhou, M., Shi, Z. (2021). Research on the Influence of Team Members with Different Creativity Levels and Academic Background on the Collaborative Design Process. In: Soares, M.M., Rosenzweig, E., Marcus, A. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability: UX Research and Design. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12779. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78221-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78221-4_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78220-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78221-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics