Skip to main content

Affective Teacher Tools: Affective Class Report Card and Dashboard

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12748))

Abstract

While using online learning software, students demonstrate many reactions, various levels of engagement, and emotions (e.g. confusion, excitement, frustration). Having such information automatically accessible to teachers (or digital tutors) can aid in understanding how students progress and suggest when and who needs further assistance. We developed the Affective Teacher Tools, a report card and dashboard that present teachers measures of students’ engagement and affective states as they use an online tutoring system, MathSpring.org, which supports students as they practice mathematics problem-solving at the middle school level. We conducted two development and research studies – one that assesses teachers perception of the affective report card and a second study that assesses a live affective dashboard, which senses students’ affect and performance in a live class that is using MathSpring. We use computer vision techniques to measure students’ engagement and affective states from their facial expressions while they use the tutoring system. In this paper, we summarize both the report card and affective dashboard, the research studies and results, and we also discuss implications, and future planned experiments for the next phase of this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Burelson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., Tai, M.: A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 24(4), 387–426 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, R.S., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to be frustrated than bored: the incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 68(4), 223–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., Means, B.: Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: an issue brief, October 2012. http://archvie2.cra.org/ccc/files/docs/learning-analytics-ed.pdf

  4. Bosch, N., D’mello, S.K., Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R.S., Shute, V.: Using video to automatically detect learner affect in computer-enabled classrooms. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. (TiiS) 6(2), 1–26 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Corrigan, S., Barkley, T., Pardos, Z.: Dynamic approaches to modeling student affect and its changing role in learning and performance. In: Ricci, F., Bontcheva, K., Conlan, O., Lawless, S. (eds.) UMAP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9146, pp. 92–103. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20267-9_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Mello, S., Dieterle, E., Duckworth, A.: Advanced, analytic, automated (AAA) measurement of engagement during learning. Educ. Psychol. 52(2), 104–123 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., Graesser, A.: Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learn. Instr. 29, 153–170 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grafsgaard, J.F., Wiggins, J.B., Vail, A.K., Boyer, K.E., Wiebe, E.N., Lester, J.C.: The additive value of multimodal features for predicting engagement, frustration, and learning during tutoring. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pp. 42–49 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, A.: Live Performance and Emotional Analysis of MathSpring Intelligent Tutor System Students. Master’s thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heffernan, N., Heffernan, C.: The ASSISTments ecosystem: building a platform that brings scientists and teachers together for minimally invasive research on human learning and teaching. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 24, 470–497 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0024-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AI-enhanced classrooms. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10947, pp. 154–168. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Menon, N.: Improving User Interface and User Experience of MathSpring Intelligent Tutoring System for Teachers. Master’s thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Leeuwen, A., Rummel, N., Van Gog, T.: What information should CSCL teacher dashboards provide to help teachers interpret CSCL situations? Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 14, 261–289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09299-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitehill, J., Serpell, Z., Lin, Y.C., Foster, A., Movellan, J.R.: The faces of engagement: automatic recognition of student engagement from facial expressions. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 5(1), 86–98 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wixon, M., Arroyo, I.: When the question is part of the answer: examining the impact of emotion self-reports on student emotion. In: Dimitrova, V., Kuflik, T., Chin, D., Ricci, F., Dolog, P., Houben, G.-J. (eds.) UMAP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8538, pp. 471–477. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08786-3_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Woolf, B., Burleson, W., Arroyo, I., Dragon, T., Cooper, D., Picard, R.: Affect-aware tutors: recognising and responding to student affect. Int. J. Learn. Technol. 4(3–4), 129–164 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zatarain-Cabada, R., Barrón-Estrada, M.L., Camacho, J.L.O., Reyes-García, C.A.: Affective tutoring system for Android mobiles. In: Huang, D.-S., Jo, K.-H., Wang, L. (eds.) ICIC 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8589, pp. 1–10. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09339-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivon Arroyo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gupta, A. et al. (2021). Affective Teacher Tools: Affective Class Report Card and Dashboard. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12748. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78291-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78292-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics