Skip to main content

Perception-Aware Bias Detection for Query Suggestions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Bias and Fairness in Information Retrieval (BIAS 2021)

Abstract

Bias in web search has been in the spotlight of bias detection research for quite a while. At the same time, little attention has been paid to query suggestions in this regard. Awareness of the problem of biased query suggestions has been raised. Likewise, there is a rising need for automatic bias detection approaches. This paper adds on the bias detection pipeline for bias detection in query suggestions of person-related search developed by Bonart et al. [2]. The sparseness and lack of contextual metadata of query suggestions make them a difficult subject for bias detection. Furthermore, query suggestions are perceived very briefly and subliminally. To overcome these issues, perception-aware metrics are introduced. Consequently, the enhanced pipeline is able to better detect systematic topical bias in search engine query suggestions for person-related searches. The results of an analysis performed with the developed pipeline confirm this assumption. Due to the perception-aware bias detection metrics, findings produced by the pipeline can be assumed to reflect bias that users would discern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.abgeordnetenwatch.de/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:MainPage.

References

  1. Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., Kalai, A.: Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06520

  2. Bonart, M., Samokhina, A., Heisenberg, G., Schaer, P.: An investigation of biases in web search engine query suggestions. Online Inf. Rev. 44(2), 365–381 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-11-2018-0341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cai, F., de Rijke, M.: A survey of query auto completion in information retrieval. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 10(4), 273–363 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daniel J. Edelman Holdings, Inc.: 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer (2020). https://www.edelman.com/trustbarometer

  5. Dean, B.: We analyzed 5 million google search results. Here’s what we learned about organic CTR (2019). https://backlinko.com/google-ctr-stats

  6. Dev, S., Phillips, J.M.: Attenuating bias in word vectors. CoRR (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.07656

  7. Google: How Google Fights disinformation (2019). https://kstatic.googleusercontent.com/files/388aa7d18189665e5f5579aef18e181c2d4283fb7b0d4691689dfd1bf92f7ac2ea6816e09c02eb98d5501b8e5705ead65af653cdf94071c47361821e362da55b

  8. Hofmann, K., Mitra, B., Radlinski, F., Shokouhi, M.: An eye-tracking study of user interactions with query auto completion. In: Li, J., Wang, X.S., Garofalakis, M.N., Soboroff, I., Suel, T., Wang, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2014, Shanghai, China, 3–7 November 2014, pp. 549–558. ACM (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2661829.2661922

  9. Honnibal, M., Montani, I., Van Landeghem, S., Boyd, A.: spaCy: industrial-strength natural language processing in Python (2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1212303

  10. Houle, C.S.: The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112(33), E4512–E4521 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419828112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Introna, L., Nissenbaum, H.: Defining the web: the politics of search engines. Computer. 33, 54–62 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/2.816269

  12. Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 20(4), 422–446 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1145/582415.582418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kulshrestha, J., et al.: Search bias quantification: investigating political bias in social media and web search. Inf. Retriev. J. 188–227 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-018-9341-2

  14. Lin, J., Nogueira, R., Yates, A.: Pretrained transformers for text ranking: BERT and beyond (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.06467

  15. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space (2013). https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781

  16. Mitra, B., Shokouhi, M., Radlinski, F., Hofmann, K.: On user interactions with query auto-completion. In: Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2014, pp. 1055–1058. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2600428.2609508

  17. Niu, X., Kelly, D.: The use of query suggestions during information search. Inf. Process. Manag. 50(1), 218–234 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Noble, S.U.: Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press (2018). http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1pwt9w5

  19. Olteanu, A., Diaz, F., Kazai, G.: When are search completion suggestions problematic? In: Computer Supported Collaborative Work and Social Computing (CSCW). ACM (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ooi, J., Ma, X., Qin, H., Liew, S.C.: A survey of query expansion, query suggestion and query refinement techniques. In: 4th International Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSECS.2015.7333094

  21. Pitoura, E., et al.: On measuring bias in online information. CoRR. vol. abs/1704.05730 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05730

  22. Ray, L.: 2020 google search survey: How much do users trust their search results? (2020). https://moz.com/blog/2020-google-search-survey

  23. Robertson, R.E., Jiang, S., Lazer, D., Wilson, C.: Auditing autocomplete: suggestion networks and recursive algorithm interrogation. In: Boldi, P., Welles, B.F., Kinder-Kurlanda, K., Wilson, C., Peters, I., Jr., W.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Web Science, WebSci 2019, Boston, MA, USA, 30 June–03 July 2019, pp. 235–244. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3292522.3326047

  24. Wang, P., et al.: Game of missuggestions: semantic analysis of search-autocomplete manipulations. In: NDSS (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabian Haak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Haak, F., Schaer, P. (2021). Perception-Aware Bias Detection for Query Suggestions. In: Boratto, L., Faralli, S., Marras, M., Stilo, G. (eds) Advances in Bias and Fairness in Information Retrieval. BIAS 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1418. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78818-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78818-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78817-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78818-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics