Skip to main content

Research Games: A Model to Support the Development of Educational Game Using Virtual Reality Platforms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 261))

Abstract

The methodology for creating digital games is usually associated with knowledge of game designer who guides strategies to engage players. Therefore, there is a need to structure this process in a model that allows people who want to know more about engagement in digital game to create engaging gaming experiences. As a result of this need, we argue that to develop player engagement processes, a UCD perspective with high levels of UX is necessary. Concepts like players type, UX, Usability, Engagement, Flow, Narrative, Presence, VR, and personas in line with context, can be combined to understand players need. In academic propose, the evaluation methods are essential to validate our decisions and guide the process. The goal of this paper, is to present a model to support the design of educational game, using VR. This model can be useful for students and researchers, that want to create rich game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gilmore, J.B.: Play: a special behavior. In: Herron, R.E., Sutton-Smith, B. (eds.) Child’s Play, pp. 343–355. Wiley, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Santayana, G.: The Sense of Beauty, 1896, vol. 2, Critical Edition. MIT Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Suits, B.: The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia. Broadview encore editions (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koster, R.: Theory of Fun for Videogames. McGraw Hill/Osborn, California (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schell, J.: The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. Elsevier, Burlington (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers, S.: Level Up! The Guide to Great Video Game Design (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bartle, R.: Virtual worlds: why people play (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bartle, R.: Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: players who suit MUDs. J. MUD Res. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Organization for Standardization: Human-centred design processes for interactive systems (ISO Standard No. ISO 13407:1999) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garrett, J.J.: The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web and Beyond, 2nd edn. New Riders (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schuemie, M.: Human-computer interaction and presence in virtual reality exposure therapy (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hartson, R., Pyla, P.: The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Morgan Kaufmann, San Diego (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norman, D.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Atffield, S., Kazay, G., Lama, M., Piwowarski, B.: Towards a science of user engagement (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. International Organization for Standardization: Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts (ISO 9241–11:2018) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Overbeeke, K., Djajadiningrat, H.C., Wensveen, S., Frens, J.: Let’s Make Things Engaging. Funology. Kluwer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’brian, H., Toms, E.: What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. JASIST (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jennings, M.: Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive e-commerce websites. ACM SIGCPR (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. O’brian, H., Toms, E., Kelloway, K., Kelley, E.: The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. JASIST (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Read, J., Macfarlane, S., Casey, C.: Endurability, engagement and expectations: measuring children’s fun. Int. Des. Child. 2, 1–23 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rozendaal, M., Keyson, D., Ridder, H.: Product features and task effects on experienced richness, control and engagement in voicemail browsing. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 13(5), 343–354 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Law, E., Roto, V., Hassenzhal, M., Vermeeren, A., Kort, A.: Understanding, scoping and defining user eXperience: a survey approach. In: ACM CHI (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi: Springer, Dordrecht (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mccabe, A., Peterson, C.: Developing Narrative Structure. Lawrence Erl-baum Associates, Hillsdale (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  25. FIELD, S.: Screenplay: The Foundations of Screenwriting. Delta (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Murray, J.: Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wiederhold, B.K., Wiederhold, M.D.: The effect of presence on virtual reality treatment. In: Wiederhold, B.K., Wiederhold, M.D. (eds.) Virtual Reality Therapy for Anxiety Disorders: Advances in Evaluation and Treatment, pp. 77–86. Psychological Association, American (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Laurel, B.: Computers as Theatre. Addison-Wesley (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ijsselsteijn, W.: Presence in Depth: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cooper, A.: The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High-Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity. SAMS, 1st edn. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nielsen, L.: Personas - User Focused Design. The Human–Computer Interaction Series. 2nd edn. Springer, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Floyd, I., Jones, M., Twidale, M.: Resolving Incommensurable Debates: A Preliminary Identification of Persona Kinds, Attributes, and Characteristics: Issues in Design Research and Design Research Methods, vol. 2, no. 1 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bradley, M., Lang, P.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Therapy Exp. Psychiatry 25 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sacharin, V., Schlegel, K., Scherer, K.R.: Geneva Emotion Wheel rating study (Report). University of Geneva, Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, Geneva (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Desmet, P.: Measuring emotion: development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In: Blythe, M.A., Monk, A.F. (eds.) Funology 2: From Usability to Enjoyment, pp. 391–404. Springer Publishing (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Watson, D., Clark, L., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 1063–1070 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dimberg, U.: For distinguished early career contribution to psychophysiology: award address, 1988. Facial Electromyography and Emotional Reactions (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Singh, N.: Arousal Level Determination in Video Game Playing Using Galvanic Skin Response (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Losch, M.E., Kim, H.S.: Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50(2), 260–268 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Affectiva, http://www.affdex.com/

  41. Reis, L., Duarte, E., Rebelo, F.: Older workers and virtual environments: usability evalu-ation of a prototype for safety sign research. Soares, M., Rebelo, F. (ed.) Ergonomics in Design, pp. 279–295. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gould, J., Lewis, C.: Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Doroftei, D., et al.: User-centered design, search and rescue robotics - from theory to practice. IntechOpen (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chammas, A., Quaresma, M., Mont’alvão, C.: A Closer Look on the User Centred Design (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A Ph.D. scholarship (SFRH/BD/129105/2017) granted to Yanick Trindade, from FCT: Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (the Portuguese Science Foundation), supported this study. CIAUD/ULisboa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Trindade, Y., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P. (2021). Research Games: A Model to Support the Development of Educational Game Using Virtual Reality Platforms. In: Rebelo, F. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics in Design. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 261. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79760-7_103

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79760-7_103

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79759-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79760-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics