Skip to main content

Methods of Co-design Using Machine Learning as Design Materials

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Ergonomics in Design (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 261))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2795 Accesses

Abstract

ML (machine learning) technology has customized products and services in different fields based on the data related to the user preference with the application of artificial intelligence technology in design. Although technology has unlimited potential to provide highly qualified products and services, we currently lack effective methods to work with ML in the design process, especially in co-design. This article aims to analyze the design methods in support of ML in the early co-design stages. This research presented an organized design workshop, in which all designers and programmers participated had more than two years of experience in ML product development. Eight users were also invited. The study discussed two methods: role-playing and scenarios, which can help co-designers understand and work with it in the fussy front end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yang, Q., Scuito, A., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Steinfeld, A.: Investigating how experienced UX designers effectively work with machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS 2018), New York, NY, USA, pp. 585–596. Association for Computing Machinery (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang, Q., Banovic, N., Zimmerman, J.: Mapping machine learning advances from HCI research to reveal starting places for design innovation. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 130, 1–11 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bratteteig, T., Verne, G.: Does AI make PD obsolete? Exploring challenges from artificial intelligence to participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2 (PDC 2018), New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery Article 8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, N.-C., Drouhard, M., Kocielnik, R., Suh, J., Aragon, C.R.: Using machine learning to support qualitative coding in social science: shifting the focus to ambiguity. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 8(2), June 2018. Article 9. 20 pages

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pirinen, A.: The barriers and enablers of co-design for services. Int. J. Des. 10(3) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buxton, B.: Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan kaufmann, Burlington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Steen, M., Manschot, M., De Koning, N.: Benefits of co-design in service design projects. Int. J. Des. 5(2) (2011). http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/890/346

  8. Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Tummers, L.G.: A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manag. Rev. 17(9), 1333–1357 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4(1), 5–18 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huxham, C.: Creating Collaborative Advantage. Sage, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cottam, H., Leadbeater, C.J.L.D.C.: Health: Co-creating Services. Design Council, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pirinen, A.: The barriers and enablers of co-design for services. Int. J. Des. 10(3), 27–42 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Visser, F.S., Stappers, P.J., Van der Lugt, R., Sanders, E.B.: Context mapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign 1(2), 119–149 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, Q., Suh, J., Chen, N.-C., Ramos, G.: Grounding Interactive Machine Learning Tool Design in How Non-Experts Actually Build Models. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS 2018), New York, NY, USA, pp. 573–584. Association for Computing Machinery (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Browne, J.T.: Wizard of Oz prototyping for machine learning experiences. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper LBW2621, pp. 1–6 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Okamoto, M., Yang, Y., Ishida, T.: Wizard of oz method for learning dialog agents. In: Klusch, M., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) CIA 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2182, pp. 20–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44799-7_3

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Peralta, R.T., et al.: Challenges to decoding the intention behind natural instruction. In: 2011 RO-MAN. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fails, J.A., Olsen Jr., D.R.: Interactive machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent user interfaces (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amershi, S., Cakmak, M., Knox, W.B., Kulesza, T.J.A.M.: Power to the people: the role of humans in interactive machine learning. AI Mag. 35(4), 105–120 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Amershi, S., Fogarty, J., Kapoor, A., Tan, D. Effective end-user interaction with machine learning. In: Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keim, D.: Mastering the information age: solving problems with visual analytics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Amershi, S.: Designing for effective end-user interaction with machine learning. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sacha, D., et al.: What you see is what you can change: human-centered machine learning by interactive visualization. Neurocomputing 268, 164–175 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Behrisch, M., et al.: Quality metrics for information visualization. Comput. Graph. Forum 37(3), 625–662 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bernardo, F., et al.: Interactive machine learning for end-user innovation. In: 2017 AAAI Spring Symposium Series (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhao, Y., Tan, H., Gao, W., Zhang, C. (2021). Methods of Co-design Using Machine Learning as Design Materials. In: Rebelo, F. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics in Design. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 261. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79760-7_117

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79760-7_117

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79759-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79760-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics