Skip to main content

Towards Augmented Enterprise Models as Low-Code Interfaces to Digital Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 422))

Abstract

Traditionally, enterprise models have been used for representing knowledge on all aspects of an organization. This aided not only in composing a holistic picture of the different layers of an enterprise in terms of its business model, products and services, business processes and IT architecture, but also for describing the inter-dependencies between the layers. Depending on the degree of formalization, algorithms may be applied to the models, e.g. for simulations. With the upcoming of low-code approaches in software engineering, we regard in this position paper how similar concepts may be integrated in enterprise engineering. In particular we regard augmented enterprise models as interfaces to digital systems and illustrate this view with approaches for semantic technologies, data analytics and blockchain platforms. It is envisaged that such approaches will aid domain experts in integrating digital technologies in their daily work practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berthold, M.R., et al.: KNIME - the Konstanz information miner: version 2.0 and beyond. SIGKDD Explor. 11(1), 26–31 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bocciarelli, P., D’Ambrogio, A., Giglio, A., Paglia, E.: BPMN-based business process modeling and simulation. In: 2019 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), pp. 1439–1453 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bock, A., Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling—conceptual foundation and implementation with ADOxx. Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling, pp. 241–267. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39417-6_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bork, D., Fill, H.: Formal aspects of enterprise modeling methods: a comparison framework. In: HICSS 2014, pp. 3400–3409. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bork, D., Fill, H., Karagiannis, D., Utz, W.: Simulation of multi-stage industrial business processes using metamodelling building blocks with ADOxx. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model. 13, 333–344 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bucchiarone, A., et al.: What is the future of modeling? IEEE Softw. 38(2), 119–127 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burke, B.: Top Strategic Technology Trends for 2021. Gartner (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caballar, R.D.: Programming without code: the rise of no-code software development. IEEE Spectrum (March 11, 2020) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Demirkan, H., Kauffman, R.J., Vayghan, J.A., Fill, H., Karagiannis, D., Maglio, P.P.: Service-oriented technology and management: perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 7(4), 356–376 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Denning, P.J., Lewis, T.G.: Technology adoption. Commun. ACM 63(6), 27–29 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferstl, O.K., Sinz, E.J.: Modeling of business systems using SOM. In: Bernus, P., Mertins, K., Schmidt, G. (eds.) Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, pp. 347–367. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26661-5_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Model driven architecture (MDA). Wirtschaftsinformatik 45(5), 555–559 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fettke, P., Reisig, W.: Modelling service-oriented systems and cloud services with Heraklit. In: Zirpins, C., et al. (eds.) ESOCC 2020. CCIS, vol. 1360, pp. 77–89. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71906-7_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Fill, H.-G.: Using semantically annotated models for supporting business process benchmarking. In: Grabis, J., Kirikova, M. (eds.) BIR 2011. LNBIP, vol. 90, pp. 29–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24511-4_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Fill, H.: SeMFIS: a flexible engineering platform for semantic annotations of conceptual models. Semant. Web 8(5), 747–763 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fill, H.: Applying the concept of knowledge blockchains to ontologies. In: Martin, A., Hinkelmann, K., Gerber, A., Lenat, D., van Harmelen, F., Clark, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the AAAI 2019 Spring Symposium on Combining Machine Learning with Knowledge Engineering (AAAI-MAKE 2019) Stanford University. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2350. CEUR-WS.org (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fill, H.: Enterprise modeling: from digital transformation to digital ubiquity. In: Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, vol. 21, pp. 1–4 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fill, H.G., Härer, F.: Knowledge blockchains: applying blockchain technologies to enterprise modeling. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fill, H.G., Härer, F.: Supporting trust in hybrid intelligence systems using blockchains. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2020 Spring Symposium on Combining Machine Learning with Knowledge Engineering (AAAI-MAKE 2020), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA, vol. 2600. CEUR-WS (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fill, H., Johannsen, F.: A knowledge perspective on big data by joining enterprise modeling and data analyses. In: Bui, T.X., Sprague Jr., R.H. (eds.) Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4052–4061. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gartner: Gartner forecasts worldwide low-code development technologies market to grow 23% in 2021 (2021). https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2021-02-15-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-low-code-development-technologies-market-to-grow-23-percent-in-2021. Accessed 30 Mar 2021

  22. Geiger, M., Harrer, S., Lenhard, J., Wirtz, G.: BPMN 2.0: the state of support and implementation. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 80, 250–262 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gong, Y., Janssen, M.: Roles and capabilities of enterprise architecture in big data analytics technology adoption and implementation. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 16(1), 37–51 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grüninger, M., Fox, M.S.: The role of competency questions in enterprise engineering. In: Rolstadås, A. (ed.) Benchmarking—Theory and Practice. IAICT, pp. 22–31. Springer, Boston (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34847-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Härer, F., Fill, H.G.: A Comparison of Approaches for Visualizing Blockchains and Smart Contracts. Jusletter IT Weblaw, February 2019 (2019). ISSN 1664-848X

    Google Scholar 

  26. Härer, F., Fill, H.: Decentralized attestation of conceptual models using the ethereum blockchain. In: Becker, J., Novikov, D.A. (eds.) 21st IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, CBI, pp. 104–113. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Henkel, M., Stirna, J.: Pondering on the key functionality of model driven development tools: the case of mendix. In: Forbrig, P., Günther, H. (eds.) BIR 2010. LNBIP, vol. 64, pp. 146–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16101-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Hopkins, J.L.: An investigation into emerging industry 4.0 technologies as drivers of supply chain innovation in Australia. Comput. Ind. 125, 103323 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Horkoff, J., Elahi, G., Abdulhadi, S., Yu, E.: Reflective analysis of the syntax and semantics of the i* framework. In: Song, I.-Y., et al. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5232, pp. 249–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87991-6_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Johannsen, F., Fill, H.G.: Meta modeling for business process improvement. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 59(4), 251–275 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Microsoft: Azure machine learning designer (2020). https://azure.microsoft.com/de-de/services/machine-learning/designer/#product-overview. Accessed 31 Mar 2021

  32. Moody, D.: The “physics” of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(6), 756–779 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Muff, F., Fill, H.: Towards embedding legal visualizations in work practices by using augmented reality. Jusletter IT (2021, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  34. OMG: Business process model and notation 2.0.2 (2014). https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN

  35. Pittl, B., Fill, H.: A visual modeling approach for the semantic web rule language. Semant. Web 11(2), 361–389 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. RapidMiner: Rapidminer studio (2020). https://docs.rapidminer.com/latest/studio/. Accessed 31 Mar 2021

  37. Reitemeyer, B., Fill, H.: Future research directions for improved service modeling. In: Koschmider, A., Michael, J. (eds.) Enterprise Modeling and Information Systems Architectures 2021 (2021, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ruiz-Rube, I., Baena-Pérez, R., Mota, J.M., Sánchez, I.A.: Model-driven development of augmented reality-based editors for domain specific languages. IxD&A 45, 246–263 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sandkuhl, K., et al.: Enterprise modelling for the masses – from elitist discipline to common practice. In: Horkoff, J., Jeusfeld, M.A., Persson, A. (eds.) PoEM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 267, pp. 225–240. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48393-1_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Sandkuhl, K., et al.: From expert discipline to common practice: a vision and research agenda for extending the reach of enterprise modeling. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60(1), 69–80 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Overview of the 4EM method. Enterprise Modeling. TEES, pp. 75–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43725-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Shishkov, B.: Designing Enterprise Information Systems - Merging Enterprise Modeling and Software Specification. Springer, Heidelberg (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22441-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. The Open Group: Archimate® 3.1 specification (2019). https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/

  44. Tisi, M., et al.: Lowcomote: training the next generation of experts in scalable low-code engineering platforms. In: Bagnato, A., Brunelière, H., Burgueño, L., Eramo, R., Gómez, A. (eds.) STAF 2019 Co-Located Events Joint Proceedings. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2405, pp. 73–78. CEUR-WS.org (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tolvanen, J.P., Rossi, M.: Metaedit+ defining and using domain-specific modeling languages and code generators. In: ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, pp. 92–93. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vernadat, F.: Enterprise modelling: research review and outlook. Comput. Ind. 122, 103265 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vještica, M., Dimitrieski, V., Pisarić, M., Kordić, S., Ristić, S., Luković, I.: An application of a DSML in industry 4.0 production processes. In: Lalic, B., Majstorovic, V., Marjanovic, U., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds.) APMS 2020. IAICT, vol. 591, pp. 441–448. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Wieland, M., Fill, H.G.: A domain-specific modeling method for supporting the generation of business plans. In: Modellierung 2020. GI LNI (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zikra, I., Stirna, J., Zdravkovic, J.: Bringing enterprise modeling closer to model-driven development. In: Johannesson, P., Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) PoEM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 92, pp. 268–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24849-8_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Georg Fill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fill, HG., Härer, F., Muff, F., Curty, S. (2021). Towards Augmented Enterprise Models as Low-Code Interfaces to Digital Systems. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 422. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79976-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79976-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79975-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79976-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics