Skip to main content

Towards an Ontology for Propaganda Detection in News Articles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12739))

Abstract

The proliferation of mis/disinformation in the media has had a profound impact on social discourse and politics in the United States. Some argue that democracy itself is threatened by the lies, chicanery, and flimflam - in short, propaganda - emanating from the highest pulpits, podiums, and soapboxes in the land. Propaganda differs from mis/disinformation in that it need not be false, but instead, it relies on rhetorical devices which aim to manipulate the audience into a particular belief or behavior. While falsehoods can be debunked, albeit with disputable efficacy, beliefs are harder to cut through. The detection of “Fake News” has received a lot of attention recently with some impressive results, however, propaganda detection remains challenging. This proposal aims to further the research into propaganda detection by constructing an ontology with this specific goal in mind, while drawing from multiple disciplines within Computer Science and the Social Sciences.

This publication has emanated from research supported in part by a grant from Science Foundation Ireland under Grant number 18/CRT/6183. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The label “Fake News” requires explanation beyond the scope of this paper - for more information see Wardle & Derakhshan [31].

  2. 2.

    https://propaganda.qcri.org/semeval2020-task11/leaderboard.php.

  3. 3.

    https://www.tanbih.org/.

  4. 4.

    https://artsresearch.uwaterloo.ca/chiastic/display/.

References

  1. The Routledge companion to media disinformation and populism. Routledge media and cultural studies companions. Routledge (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bond, G.D., et al.: ‘lyin’ted’,‘crooked hillary’, and ‘deceptive donald’: language of lies in the 2016 US presidential debates. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 31(6), 668–677 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Garcia-Duran, A., Weston, J., Yakhnenko, O.: Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In: Burges, C.J.C., Bottou, L., Welling, M., Ghahramani, Z., Weinberger, K.Q. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 26, pp. 2787–2795. Curran Associates, Inc., (2013). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2013/file/1cecc7a77928ca8133fa24680a88d2f9-Paper.pdf

  4. Cabrio, E., Villata, S.: Five years of argument mining: a data-driven analysis. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 5427–5433. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization (2018). https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/766, https://www.ijcai.org/proceedings/2018/766

  5. Ciampaglia, G.L., Shiralkar, P., Rocha, L.M., Bollen, J., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Computational fact checking from knowledge networks. PLoS One 10(6), 15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Da San Martino, G., Yu, S., Barr’on-Cede no, A., Petrov, R., Nakov, P.: Fine-grained analysis of propaganda in news articles. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, Hong Kong, China. EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Da San Martino, G., Yu, S., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Petrov, R., Nakov, P.: Fine-grained analysis of propaganda in news article. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 5635–5645. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1565, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D19-1565

  8. Dang, D.T., Nguyen, N.T., Hwang, D.: Multi-step consensus: an effective approach for determining consensus in large collectives. Cybern. Syst. 50(2), 208–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2019.1565117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris, R.A., et al.: A cognitive ontology of rhetorical figures (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hassan, N., Arslan, F., Li, C., Tremayne, M.: Toward automated fact-checking: detecting check-worthy factual claims by claimbuster. In: 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1803–1812. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly, A.R., Abbott, N.A., Harris, R.A., DiMarco, C., Cheriton, D.R.: Toward an ontology of rhetorical figures. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. SIGDOC 2010, pp. 123–130. Association for Computing Machinery (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1878450.1878471

  12. Kim, J., Tabibian, B., Oh, A., Schölkopf, B., Gomez-Rodriguez, M.: Leveraging the crowd to detect and reduce the spread of fake news and misinformation. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining - WSDM 2018, pp. 324–332. ACM Press (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159734, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3159652.3159734

  13. Lawrence, J., Reed, C.: Argument mining: a survey. Comput. Linguist. 45(4), 765–818 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martino, G.D.S., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Wachsmuth, H., Petrov, R., Nakov, P.: Semeval-2020 task 11: Detection of propaganda techniques in news articles, p. 38

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mitrovic, J., O’Reilly, C., Mladenovic, M., Handschuh, S.: Ontological representations of rhetorical figures for argument mining. Argument Comput. 8(3), 267–287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/AAC-170027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mladenović, M., Mitrović, J.: Ontology of rhetorical figures for Serbian. In: Habernal, I., Matoušek, V. (eds.) TSD 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8082, pp. 386–393. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40585-3_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Moens, M.F.: Argumentation mining: how can a machine acquire common sense and world knowledge? Argument Comput. 9(1), 1–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/AAC-170025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Donnell, G.S.J.V.J.: Propaganda and Persuasion, p. 217. SAGE Publications (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. O’Reilly, C., Paurobally, S.: Lassoing Rhetoric with OWL and SWRL (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pan, J.Z., Pavlova, S., Li, C., Li, N., Li, Y., Liu, J.: Content based fake news detection using knowledge graphs. In: Vrandečić, D., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11136, pp. 669–683. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00671-6_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Pennycook, G., Rand, D.G.: Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 116(7), 2521–2526 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806781116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruchansky, N., Seo, S., Liu, Y.: Csi: a hybrid deep model for fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 797–806. ACM (Nov 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132877

  23. Ruder, S.: Tracking progress in natural language processing | nlp-progress. https://nlpprogress.com/

  24. Sabou, M., Fernandez, M.: Ontology (Network) evaluation. In: Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, pp. 193–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Shabani, S., Sokhn, M.: Hybrid machine-crowd approach for fake news detection. In: 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), pp. 299–306 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2018.00048

  26. Shu, K., Wang, S., Liu, H.: Beyond news contents: the role of social context for fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. p. 312–320. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3289600.3290994

  27. Stirewalt, C.: Op-ed: I called arizona for biden on fox news. here’s what i learned (2021). https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-01-28/fox-news-chris-stirewalt-firing-arizona

  28. Tschiatschek, S., Singla, A., Gomez Rodriguez, M., Merchant, A., Krause, A.: Fake news detection in social networks via crowd signals. In: Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW 2018, pp. 517–524. ACM Press (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3188722, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3184558.3188722

  29. Vo, N., Lee, K.: The rise of guardians: fact-checking URL recommendation to combat fake news. In: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 275–284. ACM (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210037

  30. Walton, D.: Argument Evaluation and Evidence. LGTS, vol. 23. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19626-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Wardle, C., Derakhshan, H.: INFORMATION DISORDER: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making, p. 6, no. 27 (2017). https://tverezo.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/PREMS-162317-GBR-2018-Report-desinformation-A4-BAT.pdf

  32. Woolley, S.: The reality game: how the next wave of technology will break the truth, 1st edn. PublicAffairs (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhiwei, J., Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Luo, J.: News verification by exploiting conflicting social viewpoints in microblogs. In: Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press (2016). https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI16/paper/view/12128/12049. technical Papers: NLP and Text Mining

  34. Zhou, X., Jain, A., Phoha, V.V., Zafarani, R.: Fake news early detection: a theory-driven model. Digital Threats Res. Pract. 1(2), 1–25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3377478

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sponsored by Science Foundation Ireland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyle Hamilton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Figures

A Figures

Fig. 3.
figure 3

Propaganda and disinformation ecosystem - WORK IN PROGRESS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hamilton, K. (2021). Towards an Ontology for Propaganda Detection in News Articles. In: Verborgh, R., et al. The Semantic Web: ESWC 2021 Satellite Events. ESWC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12739. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80418-3_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80418-3_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80417-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80418-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics