Abstract
The proliferation of mis/disinformation in the media has had a profound impact on social discourse and politics in the United States. Some argue that democracy itself is threatened by the lies, chicanery, and flimflam - in short, propaganda - emanating from the highest pulpits, podiums, and soapboxes in the land. Propaganda differs from mis/disinformation in that it need not be false, but instead, it relies on rhetorical devices which aim to manipulate the audience into a particular belief or behavior. While falsehoods can be debunked, albeit with disputable efficacy, beliefs are harder to cut through. The detection of “Fake News” has received a lot of attention recently with some impressive results, however, propaganda detection remains challenging. This proposal aims to further the research into propaganda detection by constructing an ontology with this specific goal in mind, while drawing from multiple disciplines within Computer Science and the Social Sciences.
This publication has emanated from research supported in part by a grant from Science Foundation Ireland under Grant number 18/CRT/6183. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The label “Fake News” requires explanation beyond the scope of this paper - for more information see Wardle & Derakhshan [31].
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
References
The Routledge companion to media disinformation and populism. Routledge media and cultural studies companions. Routledge (2021)
Bond, G.D., et al.: ‘lyin’ted’,‘crooked hillary’, and ‘deceptive donald’: language of lies in the 2016 US presidential debates. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 31(6), 668–677 (2017)
Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Garcia-Duran, A., Weston, J., Yakhnenko, O.: Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In: Burges, C.J.C., Bottou, L., Welling, M., Ghahramani, Z., Weinberger, K.Q. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 26, pp. 2787–2795. Curran Associates, Inc., (2013). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2013/file/1cecc7a77928ca8133fa24680a88d2f9-Paper.pdf
Cabrio, E., Villata, S.: Five years of argument mining: a data-driven analysis. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 5427–5433. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization (2018). https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/766, https://www.ijcai.org/proceedings/2018/766
Ciampaglia, G.L., Shiralkar, P., Rocha, L.M., Bollen, J., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Computational fact checking from knowledge networks. PLoS One 10(6), 15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128193
Da San Martino, G., Yu, S., Barr’on-Cede no, A., Petrov, R., Nakov, P.: Fine-grained analysis of propaganda in news articles. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, Hong Kong, China. EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019 (2019)
Da San Martino, G., Yu, S., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Petrov, R., Nakov, P.: Fine-grained analysis of propaganda in news article. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 5635–5645. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1565, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D19-1565
Dang, D.T., Nguyen, N.T., Hwang, D.: Multi-step consensus: an effective approach for determining consensus in large collectives. Cybern. Syst. 50(2), 208–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2019.1565117
Harris, R.A., et al.: A cognitive ontology of rhetorical figures (2017)
Hassan, N., Arslan, F., Li, C., Tremayne, M.: Toward automated fact-checking: detecting check-worthy factual claims by claimbuster. In: 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1803–1812. ACM (2017)
Kelly, A.R., Abbott, N.A., Harris, R.A., DiMarco, C., Cheriton, D.R.: Toward an ontology of rhetorical figures. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. SIGDOC 2010, pp. 123–130. Association for Computing Machinery (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1878450.1878471
Kim, J., Tabibian, B., Oh, A., Schölkopf, B., Gomez-Rodriguez, M.: Leveraging the crowd to detect and reduce the spread of fake news and misinformation. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining - WSDM 2018, pp. 324–332. ACM Press (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159734, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3159652.3159734
Lawrence, J., Reed, C.: Argument mining: a survey. Comput. Linguist. 45(4), 765–818 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00364
Martino, G.D.S., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Wachsmuth, H., Petrov, R., Nakov, P.: Semeval-2020 task 11: Detection of propaganda techniques in news articles, p. 38
Mitrovic, J., O’Reilly, C., Mladenovic, M., Handschuh, S.: Ontological representations of rhetorical figures for argument mining. Argument Comput. 8(3), 267–287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/AAC-170027
Mladenović, M., Mitrović, J.: Ontology of rhetorical figures for Serbian. In: Habernal, I., Matoušek, V. (eds.) TSD 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8082, pp. 386–393. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40585-3_49
Moens, M.F.: Argumentation mining: how can a machine acquire common sense and world knowledge? Argument Comput. 9(1), 1–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/AAC-170025
O’Donnell, G.S.J.V.J.: Propaganda and Persuasion, p. 217. SAGE Publications (2018)
O’Reilly, C., Paurobally, S.: Lassoing Rhetoric with OWL and SWRL (2010)
Pan, J.Z., Pavlova, S., Li, C., Li, N., Li, Y., Liu, J.: Content based fake news detection using knowledge graphs. In: Vrandečić, D., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11136, pp. 669–683. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00671-6_39
Pennycook, G., Rand, D.G.: Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 116(7), 2521–2526 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806781116
Ruchansky, N., Seo, S., Liu, Y.: Csi: a hybrid deep model for fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 797–806. ACM (Nov 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132877
Ruder, S.: Tracking progress in natural language processing | nlp-progress. https://nlpprogress.com/
Sabou, M., Fernandez, M.: Ontology (Network) evaluation. In: Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, pp. 193–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_9
Shabani, S., Sokhn, M.: Hybrid machine-crowd approach for fake news detection. In: 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), pp. 299–306 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2018.00048
Shu, K., Wang, S., Liu, H.: Beyond news contents: the role of social context for fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. p. 312–320. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3289600.3290994
Stirewalt, C.: Op-ed: I called arizona for biden on fox news. here’s what i learned (2021). https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-01-28/fox-news-chris-stirewalt-firing-arizona
Tschiatschek, S., Singla, A., Gomez Rodriguez, M., Merchant, A., Krause, A.: Fake news detection in social networks via crowd signals. In: Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW 2018, pp. 517–524. ACM Press (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3188722, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3184558.3188722
Vo, N., Lee, K.: The rise of guardians: fact-checking URL recommendation to combat fake news. In: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 275–284. ACM (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210037
Walton, D.: Argument Evaluation and Evidence. LGTS, vol. 23. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19626-8
Wardle, C., Derakhshan, H.: INFORMATION DISORDER: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making, p. 6, no. 27 (2017). https://tverezo.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/PREMS-162317-GBR-2018-Report-desinformation-A4-BAT.pdf
Woolley, S.: The reality game: how the next wave of technology will break the truth, 1st edn. PublicAffairs (2020)
Zhiwei, J., Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Luo, J.: News verification by exploiting conflicting social viewpoints in microblogs. In: Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press (2016). https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI16/paper/view/12128/12049. technical Papers: NLP and Text Mining
Zhou, X., Jain, A., Phoha, V.V., Zafarani, R.: Fake news early detection: a theory-driven model. Digital Threats Res. Pract. 1(2), 1–25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3377478
Acknowledgements
Sponsored by Science Foundation Ireland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
A Figures
A Figures
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hamilton, K. (2021). Towards an Ontology for Propaganda Detection in News Articles. In: Verborgh, R., et al. The Semantic Web: ESWC 2021 Satellite Events. ESWC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12739. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80418-3_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80418-3_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80417-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80418-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)