Skip to main content

Expert, Novice, and Intermediate Performance: Exploring the Relationship Between Clinical Reasoning Behaviors and Diagnostic Performance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12677))

Abstract

Understanding the diagnostic process and the interplay between gathering and interpreting information can reduce the inaccuracies that lead to medical errors. In this study, we examined the relationship between medical students’ (n = 46) performance profiles and the type of clinical reasoning behaviors they executed while diagnosing a clinical patient in the context of an intelligent tutoring system, BioWorld [2]. Performance was measured by efficiency (similarity to an expert solution), confidence, and time. We found three groups: high, low, and intermediate performance. High-performing students were characterized by high efficiency, intermediate students had average efficiency and confidence, and low performing students were more characterized by low confidence rather than their efficiency score. We found that the high performers put more effort in integrating elements of the clinical case, a deep learning strategy. Unexpectedly, the high and intermediate groups additionally selected more information from the patient history, a shallow learning strategy. Our findings contribute to understanding of learning of clinical reasoning skills using an intelligent tutoring system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lajoie, S.P., Azevedo, R.: Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In: Alexander, P.A., Winne, P.H. (eds.) Handbook of Educational Psychology, pp. 803–821. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lajoie, S.P.: Developing professional expertise with a cognitive apprenticeship model: examples from avionics and medicine. In: Ericsson, K.A. (ed.) Development of Professional Expertise: Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments, pp. 61–83. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Makary, M.A., Daniel, M.: Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 353, i2139 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graber, M.L., Franklin, N., Gordon, R.: Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch. Intern. Med. 165(13), 1493–1499 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.13.1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Artino, A.R., Cleary, T.J., Dong, T., Hemmer, P.A., Durning, S.J.: Exploring clinical reasoning in novices: a self-regulated learning microanalytic assessment approach. Med. Educ. 48(3), 280–291 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng, J., Li, S., Lajoie, S.P.: The Role of achievement goals and self-regulated learning behaviors in clinical reasoning. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 25(3), 541–556 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09420-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuiper, R.A.: Integration of innovative clinical reasoning pedagogies into a baccalaureate nursing curriculum. Creat. Nurs. 19(3), 128–139 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1891/1078-4535.19.3.128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lajoie, S.P.: Learning science applications for research in medicine. In: Lin, L., Spector, J.M. (eds.) The Sciences of Learning and Instructional Design, pp. 108–118. Routledge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Durning, S.J., et al.: The feasibility, reliability, and validity of a post-encounter form for evaluating clinical reasoning. Med. Teach. 34(1), 30–37 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.590557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lubarsky, S., Dory, V., Audétat, M.-C., Custers, E., Charlin, B.: Using script theory to cultivate illness script formation and clinical reasoning in health professions education. Can. Med. Educ. J. 6(2), e61–e70 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarrell, A.: The emotional twists and turns of problem solving: an examination of learners’ behavioral, psychological and experiential emotion responses to unexpected events during problem solving. Masters thesis, McGill University, Montreal (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, S., Zheng, J., Poitras, E., Lajoie, S.: The Allocation of time matters to students’ performance in clinical reasoning. In: Nkambou, R., Azevedo, R., Vassileva, J. (eds.) ITS 2018. LNCS, vol. 10858, pp. 110–119. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Ericsson, K.A.: The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In: Ericsson, K.A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P.J., Hoffman, R.R. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, pp. 683–704. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Glaser, R.: Changing the agency for learning: acquiring expert performance. In: The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games, pp. 303–311. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eva, K.W.: What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med. Educ. 39(1), 98–106 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01972.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lajoie, S.P., Zheng, J., Li, S., Jarrell, A., Gube, M.: Examining the interplay of affect and self regulation in the context of clinical reasoning. Learn. Instr. 72, 101219 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jarrell, A., Harley, J.M., Lajoie, S., Naismith, L.: Success, failure and emotions: examining the relationship between performance feedback and emotions in diagnostic reasoning. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 65(5), 1263–1284 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9521-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lajoie, S.P., Zheng, J., Li, S.: Examining the role of self-regulation and emotion in clinical reasoning: implications for developing expertise. Med. Teach. 40(8), 842–844 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parong, J., Mayer, R.E.: Cognitive and affective processes for learning science in immersive virtual reality. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 37(1), 226–241 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lajoie, S.P., et al.: Technology-rich tools to support self-regulated learning and performance in medicine. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. SIHE, vol. 28, pp. 229–242. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, J.Y., Kim, E.J.: Effects of simulation on nursing students’ knowledge, clinical reasoning, and self-confidence: a quasi-experimental study. Korean J. Adult Nurs. 27(5), 604–611 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2015.27.5.604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Poitras, E.G., Lajoie, S.P., Doleck, T., Jarrell, A.: Subgroup discovery with user interaction data: an empirically guided approach to improving intelligent tutoring systems. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19(2), 204–214 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Meyers, L.S., Gamst, G., Guarino, A.J.: Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lundberg, K.M.: Promoting self-confidence in clinical nursing students. Nurse Educ. 33(2), 86–89 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNE.0000299512.78270.d0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandra Ruiz-Segura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ruiz-Segura, A., Lajoie, S.P. (2021). Expert, Novice, and Intermediate Performance: Exploring the Relationship Between Clinical Reasoning Behaviors and Diagnostic Performance. In: Cristea, A.I., Troussas, C. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12677. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80420-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80421-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics