Skip to main content

Detecting Hesitation During Battlefield Wound Treatment on Female Soldiers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare and Medical Devices (AHFE 2021)

Abstract

Trauma care training using a female gender retrofit kit (GRK) may provide for a more realistic environment to decrease any training gaps associated with providing trauma care to men and women. This paper builds upon pilot research [1] indicating participants hesitate when assessing a gunshot wound on a simulated female casualty compared to the same wound on a male casualty and make more errors in placing chest seals on female casualties. Using a 2 (gender of participant) × 2 (gender of the manikin) mixed design, participants must assess and treat two gunshot wounds on each manikin. The dependent measures include initial response time, exposure time, time on task, total task time, exposure success, and accuracy of the chest seals. This experiment identified that participants are more likely to miss gunshot wounds on the female casualty if covered by a bra, and struggle to apply the chest seals appropriately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Office of the Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness Report, 2019 (2020). https://prhome.defense.gov/M-RA/Inside-M-RA/TFM/Reports/. Accessed 4 Nov 2020

  2. Cross, J.D., Johnson, A.E., Wenke, J.C., Bosse, M.J., Ficke, J.R.: Mortality in female war veterans of operations enduring freedom and Iraqi freedom. Clinic. Orthop. Relat. Res. ® 469(7), 1956–1961 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frink, M., Pape, H.-C., van Griensven, M., Krettek, C., Chaudry, I.H., Hildebrand, F.: Influence of sex and age on mods and cytokines after multiple injuries. Shock (Augusta, Ga.) 27(2), 151–156 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deitch, E.A., Livingston, D.H., Lavery, R.F., Monaghan, S.F., Bongu, A., Machiedo, G.W.: Hormonally active women tolerate shock-trauma better than do men: a prospective study of over 4000 trauma patients. Ann. Surg. 246(3), 447–455 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Morte, K., Kuckelman, J., Marenco, C., Lammers, D., Bingham, J., Eckert, M.: Early outcomes following trauma related to sex: a matched analysis of military service members in the department of defense trauma registry. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 89(2S), 180–184 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schauer, S.G., et al.: Analysis of injuries and prehospital interventions sustained by females in the Iraq and Afghanistan combat zones. Prehosp. Emerg. Care 23(5), 700–707 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sotomayor, T.M., Mazzeo, M.V., Maraj, C.S., Page, A.J.: Saving female lives using simulation: elevating the training experience. Launch. Innov. Med. Model. Simul. Technol. 6(4), 28–37 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bell, J.L., Mazzeo, M.V., Pike, W.Y., Thomson, R.: Same injury, different outcome? investigating hesitation while treating female casualties. In: Proceedings from: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference, Paper No. 20410, 1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mazzeo, M.V., Sotomayor, T.M., Coulter, J.N., Alban, A.M.: Development & assessment of a human patient simulator gender retrofit kit. In: Proceedings from the interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando, FL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Allen, C.M.: Bleeding control using multiple amputee trauma trainer. In: Medical Simulation Comparison of Movement Versus Non-Movement in Training (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deployed Medicine.: Chest Seal How-to for Combat LifeSavers. https://deployedmedicine.com/content/1080. Accessed 26 June 2020

Download references

Acknowledgement

The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory, the Combat Capabilities Development Command, the United States Military Academy, or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for the Government purposed notwithstanding any copyright notation herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Thomson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mazzeo, M., Chewning-Kulick, M., Pike, W., Cartwright, J., Rovira, E., Thomson, R. (2021). Detecting Hesitation During Battlefield Wound Treatment on Female Soldiers. In: Kalra, J., Lightner, N.J., Taiar, R. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare and Medical Devices. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 263. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80744-3_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80744-3_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80743-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80744-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics