Skip to main content

Accuracy and Intrusiveness in Data-Driven Violin Players Skill Levels Prediction: MOCAP Against MYO Against KINECT

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Computational Intelligence (IWANN 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12862))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Learning to play and perform violin is a complex task, that requires a high conscious control and coordination for the player. In this paper, our aim is to understand which technology and which motion features can be used to efficiently and effectively distinguish a professional performance from a student one trading off intrusiveness and accuracy. We collected and made freely available a dataset consisting of Motion Capture (MOCAP), Electromyography, Accelerometer, and Gyroscope (MYO), and Microsoft Kinect (KINECT) recordings of different violinists with different skills performing different exercises covering different pedagogical and technical aspects. We then engineered peculiar features starting from the different sources (MOCAP, MYO, and KINECT) and trained a data-driven classifier to distinguish among two different levels of violinist experience, namely Beginners and Experts. We then studied how much accuracy do we loose when, instead of using MOCAP data (the most intrusive and costly technology), MYO data (which is less intrusive than MOCAP), or the KINECT data (the less intrusive technology) are exploited. In accordance with the hierarchy present in the dataset, we study two different scenarios: extrapolation with respect to different exercises and violinists. Furthermore we study which features are the most predictive ones of the quality of a violinist to corroborate the significance of the results. Results, both in terms of accuracy and insight on the cognitive problem, support the proposal and support the use of the presented technique as an effective tool for students to monitor and enhance their home study and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://telmi.upf.edu/.

  2. 2.

    www.casapaganini.org.

  3. 3.

    http://www.infomus.org/eyesweb_eng.php.

  4. 4.

    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/n17nvgahrnq4g5j/AAB4zYEHbKeOCoTkIt40pdvMa.

References

  1. Anguita, D., Ghio, A., Oneto, L., Parra, X., Reyes-Ortiz, J.L.: Human activity recognition on smartphones using a multiclass hardware-friendly support vector machine. In: International Workshop on Ambient Assisted Living (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aróstegui, J.L.: Educating Music Teachers for the 21st Century. Springer Science & Business Media, Rotterdam (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-503-1

  3. Baader, A.P., Kazennikov, O., Wiesendanger, M.: Coordination of bowing and fingering in violin playing. Cogn. Brain Res. 23(2–3), 436–443 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bao, L., Intille, S.S.: Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In: International Conference on Pervasive Computing (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barry, N.H.: The effects of practice strategies, individual differences in cognitive style, and gender upon technical accuracy and musicality of student instrumental performance. Psychol. Music 20(2), 112–123 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Butepage, J., Black, M.J., Kragic, D., Kjellstrom, H.: Deep representation learning for human motion prediction and classification. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calude, C.S., Longo, G.: The deluge of spurious correlations in big data. Found. Sci. 22(3), 595–612 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Camurri, A., Coletta, P., Varni, G., Ghisio, S.: Developing multimodal interactive systems with EyesWeb XMI. In: International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cho, K., Chen, X.: Classifying and visualizing motion capture sequences using deep neural networks. In: International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dalmazzo, D., Ramírez, R.: Bow gesture classification to identify three different expertise levels: a machine learning approach. In: Cellier, P., Driessens, K. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2019. CCIS, vol. 1168, pp. 494–501. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43887-6_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Dalmazzo, D., Ramírez, R.: Bowing gestures classification in violin performance: a machine learning approach. Front. Psychol. 10, 344 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dalmazzo, D., Tassani, S., Ramírez, R.: A machine learning approach to violin bow technique classification: a comparison between IMU and MOCAP systems. In: International Workshop on Sensor-Based Activity Recognition and Interaction (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. D’Amato, V., Volta, E., Oneto, L., Volpe, G., Camurri, A., Anguita, D.: Understanding violin players’ skill level based on motion capture: a data-driven perspective. Cogn. Comput. 12(6), 1356–1369 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Davidson, J.W.: Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians. Psychol. Music 21(2), 103–113 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. DeVaul, R.W., Dunn, S.: Real-time motion classification for wearable computing applications. MIT Technical Report (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fernández-Delgado, M., Cernadas, E., Barro, S., Amorim, D.: Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems? J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15(1), 3133–3181 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Genuer, R., Poggi, J.M., Tuleau-Malot, C.: Variable selection using random forests. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 31(14), 2225–2236 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goebl, W., Dixon, S., Schubert, E.: Quantitative methods: Motion analysis, audio analysis, and continuous response techniques. In: Expressiveness in Music Performance: Empirical Approaches Across Styles and Cultures, pp. 221–239 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Good, P.: Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2346-5

  21. Guyon, I., Elisseeff, A.: An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(Mar), 1157–1182 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Hallam, S.: The development of metacognition in musicians: implications for education. Br. J. Music Educ. 18(1), 27–39 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobs, C.: Investigation of kinesthetics in violin playing. J. Res. Music Educ. 17(1), 112–114 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Magill, R., Anderson, D.: Motor Learning and Control. McGraw-Hill Publishing, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marquez-Borbon, A.: Perceptual learning and the emergence of performer-instrument interactions with digital music systems. In: Proceedings of a Body of Knowledge - Embodied Cognition and the Arts conference (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. McPherson, G.E., Renwick, J.M.: A longitudinal study of self-regulation in children’s musical practice. Music Educ. Res. 3(2), 169–186 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ng, K., Larkin, O., Koerselman, T., Ong, B.: i-maestro gesture and posture support: 3D motion data visualisation for music learning and playing. In: London International Conference (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oneto, L.: Model Selection and Error Estimation in a Nutshell. MOST, vol. 15. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24359-3

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosa-Pujazón, A., Barbancho, I., Tardón, L.J., Barbancho, A.M.: Fast-gesture recognition and classification using kinect: an application for a virtual reality drumkit. Multimedia Tools Appl. 75(14), 8137–8164 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruggieri, V., Katsnelson, A.: An analysis of a performance by the violinist D. Oistrakh: the hypothetical role of postural tonic-static and entourage movements. Percept. Mot. Skills 82(1), 291–300 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Saeys, Y., Abeel, T., Van de Peer, Y.: Robust feature selection using ensemble feature selection techniques. In: Daelemans, W., Goethals, B., Morik, K. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5212, pp. 313–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87481-2_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Sama, A., Pardo-Ayala, D.E., Cabestany, J., Rodríguez-Molinero, A.: Time series analysis of inertial-body signals for the extraction of dynamic properties from human gait. In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shalev-Shwartz, S., Ben-David, S.: Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory To Algorithms. Cambridge University Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Turner-Stokes, L., Reid, K.: Three-dimensional motion analysis of upper limb movement in the bowing arm of string-playing musicians. Clin. Biomech. 14(6), 426–433 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Visentin, P., Li, S., Tardif, G., Shan, G.: Unraveling mysteries of personal performance style; biomechanics of left-hand position changes (shifting) in violin performance. Peer J. 3, e1299 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Volta, E., Mancini, M., Varni, G., Volpe, G.: Automatically measuring biomechanical skills of violin performance: an exploratory study. In: International Conference on Movement and Computing (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wainberg, M., Alipanahi, B., Frey, B.J.: Are random forests truly the best classifiers? J. Mach. Learn. Res. 17(1), 3837–3841 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, N., Ambikairajah, E., Lovell, N.H., Celler, B.G.: Accelerometry based classification of walking patterns using time-frequency analysis. In: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zlatintsi, A., et al.: In: A web-based real-time kinect application for gestural interaction with virtual musical instruments, pp. 1–6. Sound in Immersion and Emotion (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by the University of Genova through the Bando per l’incentivazione alla progettazione europea 2019 - Mission 1 “Promoting Competitiveness”, the EU-H2020-ICT Project TELMI (G.A. 688269), and the EU-H2020-FETPROACT Project ENTIMEMENT (G.A. 824160).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Oneto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

D’Amato, V., Volta, E., Oneto, L., Volpe, G., Camurri, A., Anguita, D. (2021). Accuracy and Intrusiveness in Data-Driven Violin Players Skill Levels Prediction: MOCAP Against MYO Against KINECT. In: Rojas, I., Joya, G., Català, A. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IWANN 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12862. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85099-9_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85099-9_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85098-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85099-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics