Abstract
Flexibility is a key characteristic of numerous business process management domains. In these domains, the paths to fulfil process goals may not be fully predetermined, but can strongly depend on dynamic decisions made based on the current circumstances of a case. A common example is the adaptation of a standard treatment process to the needs of a specific patient. However, high flexibility does not mean chaos: certain key process rules still delimit the execution space, such as rules that prohibit the joint administration of certain drugs in a treatment, due to dangerous interactions. A renowned means to handle flexibility by design is the declarative approach, which aims to define processes through their core behavioural rules, thus leaving room for dynamic adaptation. This declarative approach to both process modelling and mining involves a paradigm shift in process thinking and, therefore, the support of novel concepts and tools. Complementing our tutorial with the same title, this paper provides a high-level introduction to declarative process mining, including its operationalisation through the RuM toolkit, key conceptual considerations, and an outlook for the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alman, A., Balder, K.J., Maggi, F.M., van der Aa, H.: Declo: a chatbot for user-friendly specification of declarative process models. In: BPM (PhD/Demos), pp. 122–126 (2020)
Alman, A., Di Ciccio, C., Haas, D., Maggi, F.M., Nolte, A.: Rule mining with RuM. In: ICPM, pp. 121–128 (2020)
Burattin, A., Maggi, F.M., Sperduti, A.: Conformance checking based on multi-perspective declarative process models. Expert Syst. Appl. 65, 194–211 (2016)
Di Ciccio, C., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Mendling, J.: Resolving inconsistencies and redundancies in declarative process models. Inf. Syst. 64, 425–446 (2017)
Davulcu, H., Kifer, M., Ramakrishnan, C.R., Ramakrishnan, I.V.: Logic based modeling and analysis of workflows. In: PODS, pp. 25–33. ACM (1998)
De Smedt, J., De Weerdt, J., Serral, E., Vanthienen, J.: Discovering hidden dependencies in constraint-based declarative process models for improving understandability. Inf. Syst. 74(Part 1), 40–52 (2018)
Di Ciccio, C., Bernardi, M.L., Cimitile, M., Maggi, F.M.: Generating event logs through the simulation of Declare models. In: EOMAS@CAiSE, pp. 20–36 (2015)
Dwyer, M.B., Avrunin, G.S., Corbett, J.C.: Patterns in property specifications for finite-state verification. In: ICSE, pp. 411–420. ACM (1999)
Green, T.R.G., Petre, M.: Usability analysis of visual programming environments: a ‘cognitive dimensions’ framework. Vis. Comp. Lang. 7(2), 131–174 (1996)
Haisjackl, C., et al.: Understanding Declare models: strategies, pitfalls, empirical results. Softw. Syst. Model. 15(2), 325–352 (2016)
Hildebrandt, T.T., Mukkamala, R.R.: Declarative event-based workflow as distributed dynamic condition response graphs. In: PLACES, vol. 69 of EPTCS, pp. 59–73 (2010)
Maggi, F.M., Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Efficient discovery of understandable declarative process models from event logs. In: CAiSE, pp. 270–285 (2012)
Mannhardt, F., Blinde, D.: Analyzing the trajectories of patients with sepsis using process mining. In: RADAR+EMISA@CAiSE, pp. 72–80 (2017)
Montali, M.: Specification and Verification of Declarative Open Interaction Models. LNBIP, vol. 56. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14538-4
Montali, M., Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Chesani, F., Mello, P., Storari, S.: Declarative specification and verification of service choreographies. ACM Trans. Web 4(1), 3:1–3:62 (2010)
Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: DECLARE: full support for loosely-structured processes. In: EDOC, pp. 287–300 (2007)
Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems - Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30409-5
Sadiq, S., Sadiq, W., Orlowska, M.: Pockets of flexibility in workflow specification. In: S.Kunii, H., Jajodia, S., Sølvberg, A. (eds.) ER 2001. LNCS, vol. 2224, pp. 513–526. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45581-7_38
Singh, M.P.: Distributed enactment of multiagent workflows: temporal logic for web service composition. In: AAMAS, pp. 907–914. ACM (2003)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pesic, M.: DecSerFlow: towards a truly declarative service flow language. In: WS-FM, pp. 1–23 (2006)
Acknowledgements
The work of A. Alman was supported by the Estonian Research Council (project PRG1226) and ERDF via the IT Academy Program. The work of C. Di Ciccio was supported by MIUR under grant “Dipartimenti di eccellenza 2018–2022” of the Department of Computer Science at Sapienza and by the Sapienza research project “SPECTRA”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alman, A., Di Ciccio, C., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., van der Aa, H. (2021). RuM: Declarative Process Mining, Distilled. In: Polyvyanyy, A., Wynn, M.T., Van Looy, A., Reichert, M. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12875. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85469-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85469-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85468-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85469-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)