Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare information on COVID-19 mitigation in Indonesia through the Twitter accounts @dinkesJKT and @pikobar_jabar and analyze them using a qualitative descriptive approach. Meanwhile, this research method used the NVivo 12 Plus application to collect data, including word frequency and chemical crosstab. This study’s findings or novelty were the four message variables or mitigation information. They were health protocol call information, COVID-19 vaccination, COVID-19 data, and the PSBB (large-scale social restrictions) policy. Furthermore, the difference or comparison regarding the two Twitter accounts’ contents was the quantity of information provision. The @dinkesJKT account in one year tweeted 1078 posts, and the @pikobar_jabar account had 2,624 Tweets. From this data, Jakarta Province has used Twitter more heavily to provide information on COVID-19 mitigation. The difference in mitigation information from the two Twitter accounts was the dominance of different messages in quantity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Nurmandi, A., Kurniasih, D., Supardal: Teknologi Informasi Pemerintahan. UMY Press, Yogyakarta (2020)
Wukich, C.: Government social media engagement strategies and public roles. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 44(1), 187–215 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1851266
Santoso, A.D., Rinjany, D., Bafadhal, O.M.: Social media and local government in indonesia: adoption, use and stakeholder engagement. Rom. J. Commun. Public Relations 22(3), 21–35 (2020)
Eckert, S., et al.: Health-related disaster communication and social media: mixed-method systematic review. Health Commun. 33(12), 1389–1400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1351278
Trajkova, M., Alhakamy, A., Cafaro, F., Vedak, S., Mallappa, R., Kankara, S.R.: Exploring casual COVID-19 data visualizations on Twitter: topics and challenges. Informatics 7(3), 1–22 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/INFORMATICS7030035
Murzintcev, N., Cheng, C.: Disaster hashtags in social media. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inform. 6(7), 1–17 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6070204
Zeemering, E.S.: Functional fragmentation in city hall and Twitter communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic: evidence from Atlanta, San Francisco, and Washington, DC. Gov. Inf. Q. 38(1), 101539 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101539
Harguem, S.: A conceptual framework on IT governance impact on organizational performance: a dynamic capability perspective. Acad. J. Interdisc. Stud. 10(1), 136 (2021). https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0012
Johannessen, M.R., Sæbø, Ø., Flak, L.S.: Social media as public sphere: a stakeholder perspective. Transform. Gov. People Process Policy 10(2), 212–238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2015-0003
Susen, S.: Critical notes on habermas’s theory of the public sphere. Sociol. Anal. 5(1), 37–62 (2011)
Simonofski, A., Vanderose, B., Clarinval, A., Snoeck, M.: The impact of user participation methods on e-government projects: the case of la Louvière, Belgium. Media Commun. 6(4), 175–186 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1657
Kim, C., Kim, K.A.: The institutional change from E-Government toward Smarter City; comparative analysis between royal borough of Greenwich, UK, and Seongdong-gu, South Korea. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 7(1), 1–33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010042
Mergel, I.: Social media institutionalization in the US federal government. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(1), 142–148 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.002
Song, C., Lee, J.: Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government, vol. 9576, February 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798
Díaz-díaz, R., De Cantabria, U.: Implementation of social media concepts for e-government: case study of a social media tool for value co-creation and citizen participation. J. Organ. End User Comput. 28(3), 104–121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2016070107
Eom, S., Hwang, H., Kim, J.H.: Can social media increase government responsiveness? A case study of Seoul. Korea. Gov. Inf. Q. 35(1), 109–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.002
Tagliacozzo, S., Magni, M.: Government to Citizens (G2C) communication and use of social media in the post-disaster reconstruction phase, vol. 7891 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2017.1339012
Palen, L., Hughes, A.L.: Social Media in Disaster Communication, pp. 497–518 (2018)
Kusumasari, B., Prabowo, N.P.A.: Scraping social media data for disaster communication: how the pattern of Twitter users affects disasters in Asia and the Pacific. Nat. Hazards 103(3), 3415–3435 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04136-z
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Setiawan, R.E.B., Nurmandi, A., Muallidin, I., Kurniawan, D., Salahudin (2022). Technology for Governance: Comparison of Disaster Information Mitigation of COVID-19 in Jakarta and West Java. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems V. IHIET 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 319. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85539-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85540-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)