Abstract
Human-technology combination is normally conceptualized on a bi-polar dimension from no technical autonomy to full technical autonomy, and consequently from full human control to no human control. This paper presents an alternative scale for describing levels of human-technology teaming. It assumes complementarity of humans and technology. Humans and technology are considered to remain qualitatively different in spite of new technical capabilities. When combined smartly, they are able to mutually compensate for weaknesses and to mutually reinforce strengths. On the proposed scale, both full human control as well as full technical autonomy are on the lowest level, as there is no teaming at all. Higher levels represent an increasing intensity of teaming ranging from (i) technology informs the human, via (ii) human and technology influence each other to (iii) true human-technology collaboration that allows for shared control. These levels are described and substantiated in the paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mitchell, M.: Artificial Intelligence. Farrar Strauss and Giroux, New York (2019)
Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Karačić, A.: Technologieversprechen Autonome Systeme. In: Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Karačić, A. (eds.) Autonome Systeme und Arbeit, pp. 9–24. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld (2019)
Kuhn, T., Liggesmeyer, P.: Autonome Systeme, Potenziale und Herausforderungen. In: Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Karačić A. (eds.) Autonome Systeme und Arbeit, pp. 27–45. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld (2019)
Fitts, P.M.: Human engineering for an effective air-navigation and traffic-control system. NRC, Washington DC (1951)
Waefler, T., Grote, G., Windischer, A., Ryser, C.: KOMPASS: a method for complementary system design. In: Hollnagel, E. (ed.) Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, pp. 477–502. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2003)
Grote, G., Weik, S., Waefler, T., Zoelch, M.: Criteria for the complementary allocation of functions in automated work systems and their use in simultaneous engineering projects. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 16, 367–382 (1995)
Sheridan, T.B.: Supervisory control. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors/Ergonomics. Wiley, New York (1987)
EASA: Artificial Intelligence Roadmap (2020). http://easa.europa.eu/ai
Sheridan, T.B.: Function allocation: algorithm, alchemy or apostasy? Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 52, 203–216 (2000)
Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of automation. In: Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K., Leplat, J. (eds.) New Technology and Human Error, pp. 271–283. Wiley, Chichester (1987)
Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., Molloy, R.: Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Hum. Factors 38, 665–679 (1996)
Manzey, D.: Systemgestaltung und Automatisierung. In: Badke-Schaub, P., Hofinger, G., Lauche, K. (eds.) Human Factors, pp. 333–352. Springer, Berlin (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19886-1_19
Abbass, H.A.: Social integration of artificial intelligence: functions, automation allocation logic and human-autonomy trust. Cogn. Comput. 11(2), 159–171 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9619-0
Bradshaw, J.M., Hoffman, R.R., Johnson, M., Woods, D.D.: The seven deadly myths of “autonomous systems.” IEEE Intell. Syst. 28(3), 54–61 (2013)
Gerst, D.: Autonome Systeme und Künstliche Intelligenz. Herausforderungen für die Arbeits systemgestaltung. In: Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Karačić, A. (eds.) Autonome Systeme und Arbeit, pp. 101–137. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld (2019)
Russell, S.: Human Compatible. Penguin Books, London (2019)
Chen, J.Q.: Who should be the boss? Machines or humans? In: Griffiths, P., Nowshade Kabir, M. (eds.) ECIAIR 2019, Oxford, UK, pp. 71–79 (2019)
Franken, S., Wattenberg, M.: The impact of AI on employment and organisation in the industrial working environment of the future. In: Griffiths, P., Nowshade Kabir, M. (eds.) ECIAIR 2019, Oxford, UK, pp. 141–148 (2019)
Bezemer, T., de Groot, M., Blasse, E., ten Berg, M., Kappen, T.H., Bredenoord, A.L.: A Human(e) in clinical decision support systems. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, 1–9 (2019)
Floridi, L.: The Fourth Revolution How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016)
Zuboff, S.: In the Age of the Smart Machine. Basic Books, New York (1988)
Waefler, T.: Gebildeter und vernetzter Mensch: Vier Thesen zur soziotechnischen Gestaltung der Zukunft. J. Psychologie des Arbeitshandelns. 13(2), 5–21 (2020)
Grote, G.: Gestaltungsansätze für das komplementäre Zusammenwirken von Mensch und Technik in Industrie 4.0. In: Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Ittermann, P., Niehaus, J. (eds.) Digitalisierung industrieller Arbeit, pp. 131–146. Nomos, Baden-Baden (2015)
Crowe, D., LaPierre, M., Kebritchi, M.: Knowledge based artificial augmentation intelligence technology: next step in academic instructional tools of distance learning. TechTrends 61, 494–506 (2017)
Kirste, M.: Augmented Intelligence – Wie Menschen mit KI zusammen arbeiten. In: Wittpahl, V. (ed.) Künstliche Intelligenz, pp. 58–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58042-4_4
Scherk, J., Pöchhacker-Tröscher, G., Wagner, K.: Künstliche Intelligenz - Artificial Intelligence. Pöschhacker Innovation Consulting, Linz (2017)
Both, G., Weber, J.: Hands-free driving? Automatisiertes Fahren und Mensch-Maschine Interaktion. In: Hilgendorf, E. (ed.) Robotik im Kontext von Moral und Recht, pp. 171–188. Nomos, Baden-Baden (2014)
Samek, W., Wiegand, T., Müller, K.-R.: Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Models. ICT Discov. 1, 1–10 (2017). Special Issue The Impact of AI on Communication Networks and Services
Rodriguez, S.S., O’Donovan, J., Schaffer, J.A., Höllerer, T.: Knowledge complacency and decision support systems. In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA), pp.43–51 (2019)
Schmid, U., Finzel, B.: Mutual explanations for cooperative decision making in medicine. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 34(2), 227–233 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00633-2
Ittermann, P., Niehaus, J., Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Dregger, J., ten Hompel, M.: Social Manufacturing and Logistics. Gestaltung von Arbeit in der digitalen Produktion und Logistik. Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund (2016)
Heim, P.: Interaktive Angleichung als Modell für die Mensch-Computer-Interaktion im Semantic Web. Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart (2011)
Ludwig, B.: Planbasierte Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion in multimodalen Assistenzsystemen. Springer, Berlin (2015).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44819-9
Onnasch, L., Roesler, E.: A taxonomy to structure and analyze human–robot interaction. Int. J. Soc. Robot. (2020)
Schmidt, A., Herrmann, T.: User interfaces: a new interaction paradigm for automated systems. Interactions 25(5), 41–46 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Waefler, T. (2022). Progressive Intensity of Human-Technology Teaming. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems V. IHIET 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 319. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85539-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85540-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)