Skip to main content

Typologies of Persuasive Strategies and Content: A Formalization Using Argumentation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Social Good. The PAAMS Collection (PAAMS 2021)

Abstract

Persuasion is an active research topic in artificial intelligence (AI), human-computer interaction (HCI), and social sciences. When persuasive technology has been designed, some HCI guidelines have commonly used disregarding the current AI state of the art, for example, ignoring autonomy and proactive AI behavior. In this paper, a systematic review of HCI persuasive strategies and their corresponding content is mapped to a formal AI approach using argumentation theory. We also present experimental results using as context a mobile application for behavior change in the Swedish context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://rqda.r-forge.r-project.org.

  2. 2.

    TweetyProject acceded on April 2021 https://tweetyproject.org/.

  3. 3.

    Ionic acceded on April 2021 https://ionicframework.com.

References

  1. Amgoud, L., de Saint-Cyr, F.D.: An axiomatic approach for persuasion dialogs. In: 2013 IEEE 25th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 618–625. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bratman, M.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charmaz, K.: Grounded theory: methodology and theory construction. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 6396–6399. Pergamon, Oxford, January 2001

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, S., Chaiken, S.: The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In: Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, pp. 93–96. Guilford Publications (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crano, W.D., Prislin, R.: Attitudes and persuasion. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 57, 345–374 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dennison, L., Morrison, L., Conway, G., Yardley, L.: Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J. Med. Internet Res. 15(4), e2583 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deonna, J.A., Teroni, F.: Emotions as attitudes. Dialectica 69(3), 293–311 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321–357 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Guerini, M., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M.: A taxonomy of strategies for multimodal persuasive message generation. Appl. Artif. Intell. 21(2), 99–136 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guerrero, E., Lindgren, H.: Practical reasoning about complex activities. In: Demazeau, Y., Davidsson, P., Bajo, J., Vale, Z. (eds.) PAAMS 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10349, pp. 82–94. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59930-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Guerrero, E., Nieves, J.C., Lindgren, H.: Semantic-based construction of arguments: an answer set programming approach. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 64, 54–74 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter, A.: Modelling the persuadee in asymmetric argumentation dialogues for persuasion. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2015, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25–31 July 2015, pp. 3055–3061 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson, D., Deterding, S., Kuhn, K.A., Staneva, A., Stoyanov, S., Hides, L.: Gamification for health and wellbeing: a systematic review of the literature. Internet Interv. 6, 89–106 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maimone, R., Guerini, M., Dragoni, M., Bailoni, T., Eccher, C.: PerKApp: a general purpose persuasion architecture for healthy lifestyles. J. Biomed. Inf. 82, 70–87 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Némery, A., Brangier, E.: Set of guidelines for persuasive interfaces: organization and validation of the criteria. J. Usability Stud. 9(3), 105–128 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ng, N., et al.: Sustainable behavior change for health supported by person-tailored, adaptive, risk-aware digital coaching in a social context: study protocol for the STAR-C research programme. Front. Public Health 9, 593453 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24(1), 28 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Petty, R.E., Briñol, P.: The elaboration likelihood model. In: Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 224–245 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P., et al.: BDI agents: from theory to practice. In: ICMAS, vol. 95, pp. 312–319 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sama, P.R., Eapen, Z.J., Weinfurt, K.P., Shah, B.R., Schulman, K.A.: An evaluation of mobile health application tools. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2(2), e3088 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwartz, S.H.: Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 1–65. Elsevier (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walton, D., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Series in Logic and Language, State University of New York Press, Albany (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Agent theories, architectures, and languages: a survey. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R. (eds.) ATAL 1994. LNCS, vol. 890, pp. 1–39. Springer, Heidelberg (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58855-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Research was supported by Forte, the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, which supports the STAR-C project during 2019–2024 (Dnr. 2018-01461).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esteban Guerrero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guerrero, E., Lindgren, H. (2021). Typologies of Persuasive Strategies and Content: A Formalization Using Argumentation. In: Dignum, F., Corchado, J.M., De La Prieta, F. (eds) Advances in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Social Good. The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12946. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85739-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85739-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85738-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85739-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics