Abstract
Research on online engagement is abundant. However, most of the available studies have focused on a single course. Therefore, little is known about how students’ online engagement evolves over time. Previous research in face-to-face settings has shown that early disengagement has negative consequences on students’ academic achievement and graduation rates. This study examines the longitudinal trajectory of students’ online engagement throughout a complete college degree. The study followed 99 students over 4 years of college education including all their course data (15 courses and 1383 course enrollments). Students’ engagement states for each course enrollment were identified through Latent Class Analysis (LCA). Students who were not engaged at least one course in the first term was labeled as “Early Disengagement”, whereas the remaining students were labeled as “Early Engagement”. The two groups of students were analyzed using sequence pattern mining methods. The stability (persistence of the engagement state), transition (ascending to a higher engagement state or descending to a lower state), and typology of each group trajectory of engagement are described in this study. Our results show that early disengagement is linked to higher rates of dropout, lower scores, and lower graduation rates whereas early engagement is relatively stable. Our findings indicate that it is critical to proactively address early disengagement during a program, watch the alarming signs such as presence of disengagement during the first courses, declining engagement along the program, or history of frequent disengagement states.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Newmann, F.M.: Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools. ERIC (1992)
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74, 59–109 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Finn, J.D., Zimmer, K.S.: Student engagement: what is it? Why does it matter? In: Christenson, S., Reschly, A., Wylie, C. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 97–131. Springer, Boston (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5
Lei, H., Cui, Y., Zhou, W.: Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Soc. Behav. Pers. 46, 517–528 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
Azevedo, R.: Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educ. Psychol. 50, 84–94 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069
Skinner, E.A., Pitzer, J.R.: Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In: Christenson, S.L., Reschly, A.L., Wylie, C. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 21–44. Springer, Boston (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Zhen, R., et al.: Trajectory patterns of academic engagement among elementary school students: the implicit theory of intelligence and academic self-efficacy matters. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 90, 618–634 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12320
Henrie, C.R., Halverson, L.R., Graham, C.R.: Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: a review. Comput. Educ. 90, 36–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
Barthakur, A., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., Siemens, G., Richey, M., Dawson, S.: Assessing program-level learning strategies in MOOCs. Comput. Hum. Behav. 117, 106674 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106674
Lust, G., Elen, J., Clarebout, G.: Regulation of tool-use within a blended course: student differences and performance effects. Comput. Educ. 60, 385–395 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.001
Saqr, M., Wasson, B.: COVID-19: Lost opportunities and lessons for the future. Int. J. Health Sci. 14, 4–6 (2020)
Wang, M.T., Degol, J.: Staying engaged: knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Dev. Perspect. 8, 137–143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12073
King, R.B.: Sense of relatedness boosts engagement, achievement, and well-being: a latent growth model study. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 42, 26–38 (2015)
Fredricks, J.A., McColskey, W.: The measurement of student engagement: a comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In: Christenson, S.L., Reschly, A.L., Wylie, C. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 763–782. Springer, Boston (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37
Redmond, P., Abawi, L.A., Brown, A., Henderson, R., Heffernan, A.: An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learn. J. 22, 183–204 (2018). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., Mac Iver, D.J.: Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: early identification and effective interventions. Educ. Psychol. 42, 223–235 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701621079
López-Pernas, S., Saqr, M., Viberg, O.: Putting it all together: combining learning analytics methods and data sources to understand students’ approaches to learning programming. Sustainability. 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094825
Saqr, M., Fors, U., Tedre, M.: How learning analytics can early predict under-achieving students in a blended medical education course. Med. Teach. 39, 757–767 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1309376
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R.W., Davis‐Kean, P.: Development of achievement motivation and engagement. Handb. Child Psychol. 3, 657–700 (2007)
You, S., Sharkey, J.: Testing a developmental-ecological model of student engagement: a multilevel latent growth curve analysis. Educ. Psychol. 29, 659–684 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903206815
Archambault, I., Dupéré, V.: Joint trajectories of behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in elementary school. J. Educ. Res. 110, 188–198 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1060931
López-Pernas, S., Saqr, M.: Idiographic learning analytics: a within-person ethical perspective. In: Companion Proceedings 11th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK21), pp. 310–315 (2021)
Mirriahi, N., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gaševic, D., Pardo, A.: Identifying engagement patterns with video annotation activities: a case study in professional development (2018)
Palvia, S., et al.: Online education: worldwide status, challenges, trends, and implications. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 21, 233–241 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1542262
Joksimović, S., et al.: How do we model learning at scale? A systematic review of research on MOOCs (2018). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317740335
Vytasek, J.M., Patzak, A., Winne, P.H.: Analytics for student engagement (2020)
Saqr, M.: Learning analytics and medical education. Int. J. Health Sci. 9 (2015)
Uzir, N.A.A.A., et al.: Analytics of time management and learning strategies for effective online learning in blended environments. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 392–401. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375493
Agrawal, R., Srikant, R.: Mining sequential patterns. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 3–14. IEEE (1995)
Ritschard, G., Studer, M.: Sequence analysis: where are we, where are we going? In: Ritschard, G., Studer, M. (eds.) Sequence Analysis and Related Approaches. LCRSP, vol. 10, pp. 1–11. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95420-2_1
Saqr, M., Viberg, O., Vartiainen, H.: Capturing the participation and social dimensions of computer-supported collaborative learning through social network analysis: which method and measures matter? Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 15(2), 227–248 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09322-6
Saqr, M., Nouri, J., Jormanainen, I.: A learning analytics study of the effect of group size on social dynamics and performance in online collaborative learning. In: Scheffel, M., Broisin, J., Pammer-Schindler, V., Ioannou, A., Schneider, J. (eds.) EC-TEL 2019. LNCS, vol. 11722, pp. 466–479. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_35
Jovanović, J., Mirriahi, N., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A.: Predictive power of regularity of pre-class activities in a flipped classroom. Comput. Educ. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.011
Hung, J.-L., Shelton, B.E., Yang, J., Du, X.: Improving predictive modeling for at-risk student identification: a multistage approach (2019)
Goodman, L.A.: Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika 61, 215–231 (1974)
Tomczak, M., Tomczak, E.: The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends Sport Sci. 21, 19–25 (2014)
Ostertagova, E., Ostertag, O., Kováč, J.: Methodology and application of the Kruskal-Wallis test. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials, pp. 115–120. Trans Tech Publ (2014)
Holm, S.: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979)
Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Müller, N.S., Studer, M.: Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. J. Stat. Softw. 40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i04
Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Studer, M., Nicolas, S.M.: Mining sequence data in R with the TraMineR package: a users guide for version 1.2, p. 1. University of Geneva, Geneva (2009)
Fincham, E., Gašević, D., Jovanović, J., Pardo, A.: From study tactics to learning strategies: an analytical method for extracting interpretable representations. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12, 59–72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2823317
Blossfeld, H.P., Golsch, K., Rohwer, G.: Event History Analysis with Stata. Routledge (2007). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936559
McKnight, P.E., Najab, J.: Mann‐Whitney U test. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, p. 1 (2010)
Kovanović, V., et al.: Examining communities of inquiry in massive open online courses: the role of study strategies. Internet High. Educ. 40, 20–43 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saqr, M., López-Pernas, S. (2021). The Dire Cost of Early Disengagement: A Four-Year Learning Analytics Study over a Full Program. In: De Laet, T., Klemke, R., Alario-Hoyos, C., Hilliger, I., Ortega-Arranz, A. (eds) Technology-Enhanced Learning for a Free, Safe, and Sustainable World. EC-TEL 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12884. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86436-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86436-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86435-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86436-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)