Skip to main content

Towards an Information Privacy and Personal Data Protection Competency Model for Citizens

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business (TrustBus 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 12927))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the competencies that citizens should hold to protect own information privacy and personal data. Based on conceptual analysis, this study examines theoretical frameworks on competency models (e.g., the Iceberg Competency Model) and proposes a roadmap for developing the first information privacy competency model in the information systems literature. The study conducts a systematic analysis to reveal the lack of information privacy competency models in the literature and derive any reported information privacy competencies. In sequence, synthesizes the results into a preliminary information privacy competency model comprising attributes that citizens should hold to be competent to protect own information privacy and personal data, including knowledge, skills, attitudes, values, etc. The results of this work can be valuable for information privacy researchers, online service providers, policy makers and educators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Special Eurobarometer 487a, The General Data Protection Regulation. https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinionmobile/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/surveyKy/2222

  2. Abramova, O., Wagner, A., Krasnova, H., Buxmann P.: Understanding Self-Disclosure on Social Networking Sites - A Literature Review. AMCIS, Boston (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zlatolas, L., Welzer, T., Heričko, M., Hölbl, M.: Privacy antecedents for SNS self-disclosure: the case of Facebook. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 158–167 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ginosar, A., Ariel, Y.: An analytical framework for online privacy research: what is missing? Inf. Manag. 54(2017), 948–957 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chou, H., Liu, Y., Chou, C.: Privacy behavior profiles of underage Facebook users. Comput. Educ. 128, 473–485 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jozani, M., Ayaburi, E., Ko, M., Choo, K.: Privacy concerns and benefits of engagement with social media-enabled apps: a privacy calculus perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 107, 106260 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerber, N., Gerber, P., Volkamer, M.: Explaining the privacy paradox: a systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behavior. Comput. Secur. 77, 226–261 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, J.V., Widjaja, A.E., Yen, D.C.: Need for affiliation, need for popularity, self-esteem, and the moderating effect of big five personality traits affecting individuals’ self-disclosure on Facebook. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 31(11), 815–831 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyatzis, R.E.: The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. Wiley, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Winterton, J.: Competences across Europe: highest common factor or lowest common denominator. J. Eur. Ind. Train. 33(8/9), 618–670 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tobias, L., Dietrich, A.: Identifying employee competencies in dynamic work domains: methodological considerations and a case study. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 9(12), 1500–1518 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Levy, P.E.: Industrial/Organizational Psychology, 2nd edn. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holtkamp, P., Jokinen, J.P., Pawlowski, M.Y.: Soft competency requirements in requirements engineering, software design, implementation, and testing. J. Syst. Softw. 101, 136–146 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Holtkamp, P.: Competency requirements of global software development conceptualization, contextualization, and consequences. Ph.D. thesis, University of Jyvaskyla (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holtkamp, P., Lau, I., Pawlowski, J.M.: How software development competences change in global settings—an explorative study. J. Softw. Evol. Process. 27, 50–72 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, Y.-T.: Exploring high-performers’ required competencies. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(1), 434–439 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spencer, L.M., Spencer, P.S.M.: Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. Wiley, Hoboken (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sampson, D., Fytros, D.: Competence models in technology-enhanced competence-based learning. In: Adelsberger, H.H., Kinshuk, J.M., Pawlowski, D.G., Sampson, (eds.) Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training, pp. 155–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74155-8_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Ho, S., Frampton, K.: A competency model for the information technology workforce: implications for training and selection. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 27(5), 63–80 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sydänmaanlakka, P.: Intelligent leadership and leadership competencies - developing a leadership framework for intelligent organizations. Ph.d. thesis (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Klendauer, R., Berkovich, M., Gelvin, R., Leimeister, J., Krcmar, H.: Towards a competency model for requirements analysts. Inf. Syst. J. 22(6), 475–503 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moustroufas, E., Stamelos, I., Angelis, L.: Competency profiling for software engineers: literature review and a new model. In: PCI 2015: Proceedings of the 19th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, pp. 235–240, October 2015

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prifti, L., Knigge, M., Kienegger, H., Krcmar, H.: A competency model for “industrie 4.0” employees. In: Leimeister, J.M., Brenner, W. (eds.) Proceedings der 13. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2017), St. Gallen, pp. 46–60 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eschenbrenner, B., Nah, F.: Information systems user competency: a conceptual foundation. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, 80 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Impagliazzo, J., Sabin, M., Alrumaih, H., Viola, B.: An information technology competency model and curriculum. In: 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, pp. 892–895 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Whitman, M.: Industry priorities for cybersecurity competencies. In: Journal of the Colloquium for Information System Security Education (CISSE), 6th edn, no. 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tsohou, A., Holtkamp, P.: Are users competent to comply with information security policies? An analysis of professional competence models. Inf. Technol. People 31(5), 1047–1068 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Holtkamp, P., Pawlowski, J.M.: A competence-based view on the global software development process. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 21(11), 1385–1404 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moll, R., Pieschl, S., Bromme, R.: Competent or clueless? Users’ knowledge and misconceptions about their online privacy management. Comput. Hum. Behav. 41, 212–219 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schueller, S., Armstrong, C., Neary, M., Ciulla, R.: An Introduction to Core Competencies for the Use of Mobile Apps in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. Cogn. Behav. Pract. (2021, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lauricella, A., Herdzina, J., Robb, M.: Early childhood educators’ teaching of digital citizenship competencies. Comput. Educ. 158, 103989 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Desimpelaere, L., Huddersa, L., Van de Sompela, D.: Knowledge as a strategy for privacy protection: how a privacy literacy training affects children’s online disclosure behaviour. Comput. Hum. Behav. 110, 106382 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. International Digital Education Working Group: Personal data protection competency framework for school students: intended to help educators. In: International Conference of Privacy and Data Protection Commissioners (2016). https://edps.europa.eu/sites/edp/files/publication/16-10-18_resolution-competency-framework_en.pdf

  34. Hatamian, M., Serna, J., Rannenberg, K.: Revealing the unrevealed: mining smartphone users privacy perception on app markets. Comput. Secur. 83, 332–353 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lankton, N., McKnight, D., Tripp, J.: Facebook privacy management strategies: a cluster analysis of user privacy behaviors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 76, 149–163 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li, P., Cho, H., Goh, Z.: Unpacking the process of privacy management and self-disclosure from the perspectives of regulatory focus and privacy calculus. Telematics Inform. 41, 114–125 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hallam, C., Zanella, G.: Online self-disclosure: the privacy paradox explained as a temporally discounted balance between concerns and rewards. Comput. Hum. Behav. 68, 217–227 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Soumelidou, A., Tsohou, A.: Towards the creation of a profile of the information privacy aware user through a systematic literature review of information privacy awareness. Telemat. Inform. 61, 101592 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Harborth, D., Pape, S.: How privacy concerns, trust and risk beliefs, and privacy literacy influence users’ intentions to use privacy-enhancing technologies: the case of tor. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4851–4860 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Capistrano, P.E., Chena, V.J.: Information privacy policies: the effects of policy characteristics and online experience. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 42, 24–31 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data

    Google Scholar 

  42. Skalkos, A., Tsohou, A., Karyda, M., Kokolakis, S.: Identifying the values associated with users’ behavior towards anonymity tools through means-end analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 2, 100034 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper has received funding from the GSRT for the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 787068.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aggeliki Tsohou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tsohou, A. (2021). Towards an Information Privacy and Personal Data Protection Competency Model for Citizens. In: Fischer-Hübner, S., Lambrinoudakis, C., Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds) Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business. TrustBus 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12927. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86586-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86586-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86585-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86586-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics