Skip to main content

Towards a Tesseract of Sugeno Integrals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12897))

Abstract

Structures of opposition, such as the hexagon and different cubes, derived from the square of opposition of ancient logic, have for more than a decade shown their interest in the analysis of various frameworks for the representation and processing of information (possibly pervaded with uncertainty). The use of a renewed and less constrained vision of the structures of opposition leads in this article to consider a general cube and a hypercube of opposition applicable to binary or gradual settings, which is here exemplified on Sugeno integrals and related integrals

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Obviously, dealing with a ternary expression R(ABC), and h applying to argument C would lead to a natural and straightforward extension.

References

  1. Béziau, J.Y.: New light on the square of oppositions and its nameless corner. Logical Invest. 10, 218–233 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Béziau, J.-Y.: The power of the hexagon. Logica Universalis 6(1–2), 1–43 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanché, R.: Sur l’opposition des concepts. Theoria 19, 89–130 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanché, R.: Structures Intellectuelles. Essai sur l’Organisation Systématique des Concepts. Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, Paris (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ciucci, D., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Structures of opposition induced by relations. The Boolean and the gradual cases. Ann. Maths Artif. Intel. 76, 351–373 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Faux, F., Prade, H., Rico, A.: Qualitative capacities and their informational comparison. In: Proceedings 12th Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT 2021), 19–24 September 2021, Bratislava (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, D., Marichal, J.-L., Prade, H., Roubens, M., Sabbadin, R.: The use of the discrete Sugeno integral in decision-making: a survey. Int. J. Uncert. Fuzz. Knowl. Syst. 9(5), 539–561 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: From Blanché’s hexagonal organization of concepts to formal concept analysis and possibility theory. Logica Univers. 6, 149–169 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rico, A.: The cube of opposition: a structure underlying many knowledge representation formalisms. In: Proceedings 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2015), Buenos Aires, AAAI Press, pp. 2933–2939 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rico, A.: Representing qualitative capacities as families of possibility measures. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 58, 3–24 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rico, A.: Residuated variants of sugeno integrals: towards new weighting schemes for qualitative aggregation methods. Inf. Sci. 329, 765–781 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rico, A.: Graded cubes of opposition and possibility theory with fuzzy events. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 84, 168–185 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rico, A.: Organizing families of aggregation operators into a cube of opposition. In: Kacprzyk, J., Filev, D., Beliakov, G. (eds.) Granular, Soft and Fuzzy Approaches for Intelligent Systems. SFSC, vol. 344, pp. 27–45. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40314-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rico, A.: Structures of opposition and comparisons: Boolean and gradual cases. Logica Univ. 14, 115–149 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rico, A.: Le tesseract de l’intégrale de Sugeno. In: Actes 29èmes Rencontres Francophones sur la Logique Floue et ses Applications (LFA 2020), Sète, 15–16 October, Cépaduès (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rico, A., Teheux, B.: Generalized qualitative Sugeno integrals. Inf. Sci. 415, 429–445 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Gottschalk, W.H.: The theory of quaternality. J. Symb. Logic. 18, 193–196 (1953)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Holčapek, M., Rico, A.: A note on the links between different qualitative integrals. In: Fuzz-IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson, W.E.: Logic. Cambridge University Press, Part I (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Keynes, J.N.: Studies and Exercises in Formal Logic, 3rd edn. MacMillan (1894)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moretti, A.: The geometry of standard deontic logic. Logica Univ. 3, 19–57 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moyse, G.: Résumés linguistiques de données numériques: interprétabilité et périodicité de séries. Thèse Univ, Paris (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moyse, G., Lesot, M.-J., Bouchon-Meunier, B.: Oppositions in fuzzy linguistic summaries. Int. Conf. Fuzzy System (Fuzz-IEEE 2015), Istanbul (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Murray, F.B. (ed.): Critical Features of Piaget’s Theory of the Development of Thought. University of Delaware Press, Newark (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nilsson, J.F.: A cube of opposition for predicate logic. Logica Univ. 14, 103–114 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Piaget, J.: Traité de logique. Essai de logistique opératoire, Armand Colin (1949)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Parsons, T.: The traditional square of opposition. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pfeifer, N., Sanfilippo, G.: Probabilistic squares and hexagons of opposition under coherence. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 88, 282–294 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Pizzi, C.: Contingency logics and modal squares of opposition. In: Beziau, J.Y., Gan-Krzywoszynska, K. (eds.) Handbook of Abstracts of the 3rd World Congress on the Square of Opposition, Beirut, 26–30 June, pp. 29–30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reichenbach, H.: The syllogism revised. Philos. Sci. 19(1), 1–16 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Westerståhl, D.: Classical vs. modern squares of opposition, and beyond. In: Payette, G., Béziau, J.-Y. (eds.) The Square of Opposition. A General Framework for Cognition, Peter Lang, pp. 195–229 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henri Prade .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rico, A. (2021). Towards a Tesseract of Sugeno Integrals. In: Vejnarová, J., Wilson, N. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12897. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86771-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86772-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics