Skip to main content

Prototypical Models for Classifying High-Risk Atypical Breast Lesions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2021 (MICCAI 2021)

Abstract

High-risk atypical breast lesions are a notoriously difficult dilemma for pathologists who diagnose breast biopsies in breast cancer screening programs. We reframe the computational diagnosis of atypical breast lesions as a problem of prototype recognition on the basis that pathologists mentally relate current histological patterns to previously encountered patterns during their routine diagnostic work. In an unsupervised manner, we investigate the relative importance of ductal (global) and intraductal patterns (local) in a set of pre-selected prototypical ducts in classifying atypical breast lesions. We conducted experiments to test this strategy on subgroups of breast lesions that are a major source of inter-observer variability; these are benign, columnar cell changes, epithelial atypia, and atypical ductal hyperplasia in order of increasing cancer risk. Our model is capable of providing clinically relevant explanations to its recommendations, thus it is intrinsically explainable, which is a major contribution of this work. Our experiments also show state-of-the-art performance in recall compared to the latest deep-learning based graph neural networks (GNNs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bien, J., Tibshirani, R.: Prototype selection for interpretable classification. Ann. Appl. Statist. 5, 2403–2424 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, T.F., et al.: Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10(2), 266–277 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, C., Li, O., Tao, D., Barnett, A., Rudin, C., Su, J.K.: This looks like that: deep learning for interpretable image recognition. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 8930–8941 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elmore, J.G., et al.: Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. JAMA 313(11), 1122–1132 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartmann, L.C., Degnim, A.C., Santen, R.J., Dupont, W.D., Ghosh, K.: Atypical hyperplasia of the breast–risk assessment and management options. New England J. Med. 372(1), 78–89 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hase, P., Chen, C., Li, O., Rudin, C.: Interpretable image recognition with hierarchical prototypes. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, vol. 7, pp. 32–40 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hugar, S.B., Bhargava, R., Dabbs, D.J., Davis, K.M., Zuley, M., Clark, B.Z.: Isolated flat epithelial atypia on core biopsy specimens is associated with a low risk of upgrade at excision. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 151(5), 511–515 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lakhani, S.R.: WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. LeCun, Y.A., Bottou, L., Orr, G.B., Müller, K.-R.: Efficient BackProp. In: Montavon, G., Orr, G.B., Müller, K.-R. (eds.) Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade. LNCS, vol. 7700, pp. 9–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, B., et al.: Classifying breast histopathology images with a ductal instance-oriented pipeline

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mehta, S., Lu, X., Weaver, D., Elmore, J.G., Hajishirzi, H., Shapiro, L.: Hatnet: an end-to-end holistic attention network for diagnosis of breast biopsy images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.13007 (2020)

  12. Mercan, E., Mehta, S., Bartlett, J., Shapiro, L.G., Weaver, D.L., Elmore, J.G.: Assessment of machine learning of breast pathology structures for automated differentiation of breast cancer and high-risk proliferative lesions. JAMA Netw. Open 2(8), e198777–e198777 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Parvatikar, A., et al.: Modeling histological patterns for differential diagnosis of atypical breast lesions. In: Martel, A.L., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12265, pp. 550–560. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59722-1_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pati, P., et al.: HACT-Net: a hierarchical cell-to-tissue graph neural network for histopathological image classification. In: Sudre, C.H., et al. (eds.) UNSURE/GRAIL -2020. LNCS, vol. 12443, pp. 208–219. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60365-6_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Quattoni, A., Torralba, A.: Recognizing indoor scenes. In: 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 413–420. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schnitt, S.J., Connolly, J.L.: Processing and evaluation of breast excision specimens: a clinically oriented approach. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 98(1), 125–137 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Silverstein, M.: Where’s the outrage? J. Am. College Surgeons 208(1), 78–79 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. American Cancer Society: Breast cancer facts & figures 2019–2020. Am. Cancer Soc. 1–44 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tosun, A.B., et al.: Histological detection of high-risk benign breast lesions from whole slide images. In: Descoteaux, M., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10434, pp. 144–152. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66185-8_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, N., Fedorov, A., Fennessy, F., Kikinis, R., Gao, Y.: Large scale digital prostate pathology image analysis combining feature extraction and deep neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.02678 (2017)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The grant NIH-NCI U01CA204826 to SCC supported this work. The work of AP and OC was partially supported by the sub-contracts 9F-60178 and 9F-60287 from Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) to the University of Pittsburgh from the parent grant DE-AC02-06CH1135 titled, Co-Design of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Systems for Predicting Behavior of Complex Systems Using Multimodal Datasets, from the Department of Energy to ANL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Chakra Chennubhotla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 2413 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Parvatikar, A. et al. (2021). Prototypical Models for Classifying High-Risk Atypical Breast Lesions. In: de Bruijne, M., et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2021. MICCAI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12908. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87237-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87237-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87236-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87237-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics