Skip to main content

Detection of Injury and Automated Triage of Preterm Neonatal MRI Using Patch-Based Gaussian Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Perinatal Imaging, Placental and Preterm Image Analysis (UNSURE 2021, PIPPI 2021)

Abstract

Automatic detection or highlighting of neonatal brain injury could be a valuable adjunct to radiological interpretation. Here we propose a normative modeling-based detection method for preterm neonatal neuroimaging using gaussian processes (GPs). These GPs incorporates local image intensity information from image patches and demographics such as age. Z-score images can then be created from the scaled difference between the model predictions and a neonate’s T1 and T2 weighted MRI. To test the use of these GP Z-scores as a form of automated triage, we trained a logistic regression classifier to separate normal and abnormal images. We used 133 preterm neonatal images with normal-reported MRI to train a GP model and optimized lesion detection performance on 36 preterm neonatal images with manually annotated lesion masks. The automated triage model was trained on 100 preterm neonates with normal reported MRI and 109 preterm neonates with MRI detectable lesions. It was tested on the same 36 manually annotated abnormal MRI preterm neonates and 33 normal-reported preterm neonates. Using a patch diameter of 7 voxels and integrating both T1w and T2w Z-score images provided our highest performing GP model for within image lesion detection, achieving an AUC of 0.961. By combining the output probabilities of a T1w and a T2w Z-score histogram classifiers allows for the correctly identification of 32/36 abnormal and 28/33 normal images. These results indicate patch-based normative model can accurately detect lesions in a highly interpretable fashion in preterm neonates with abnormal MRI. Using outputs from these predictions, the classifier is effective at separating abnormal and normal images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Groeschel, S., et al.: Developmental changes in cerebral grey and white matter volume from infancy to adulthood. J. Dev. Neurosci. 28(6), 481–489 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, J.H., Bardo, D.M.E., Cornejo, P.: Neonatal neuroimaging. In: Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, vol. 33. WB Saunders (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Makropoulos, A., et al.: A review on automatic fetal and neonatal brain MRI segmentation. Neuroimage 170, 231–248 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahadure, N.B., et al.: Image analysis for MRI based brain tumor detection and feature extraction using biologically inspired BWT and SVM. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shoeibi, A., et al.: Applications of deep learning techniques for automated multiple sclerosis detection using magnetic resonance imaging: a review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.04881 (2021)

  6. Marquand, A., et al.: Understanding heterogeneity in clinical cohorts using normative models: beyond case-control studies. Biol. Psychiat. 80(7), 552–561 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ziegler, G., et al.: Individualized Gaussian process-based prediction and detection of local and global gray matter abnormalities in elderly subjects. Neuroimage 97, 333–348 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowles, C., et al.: Brain lesion segmentation through image synthesis and outlier detection. NeuroImage Clin. 16, 643–658 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. O’Muircheartaigh, J., et al.: Modelling brain development to detect white matter injury in term and preterm born neonates. Brain (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bogner, M.S.: Human Error in Medicine. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Jenkinson, M.: A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med. Image Anal. 5(2), 143–156 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Jenkinson, M., et al.: Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17(2), 825–841 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Avants, B.B., et al.: Advanced normalization tools (ANTS). Insight J. 2, 1–35 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, S.M.: Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 17(3), 143–155 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Makropoulos, A., et al.: The developing human connectome project: a minimal processing pipeline for neonatal cortical surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 173, 88–112 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rasmussen, C.E.: Gaussian processes in machine learning. In: Bousquet, O., von Luxburg, U., Rätsch, G. (eds.) ML 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3176, pp. 63–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28650-9_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Gardner, J., et al.: Gpytorch: blackbox matrix-matrix gaussian process inference with gpu acceleration. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kingma, D.P., et al.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  19. Tusor, N., et al.: Punctate white matter lesions associated with altered brain development and adverse motor outcome in preterm infants. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salvador, R., et al.: Evaluation of machine learning algorithms and structural features for optimal MRI-based diagnostic prediction in psychosis. PLoS One 12(4), e0175683 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering at Kings College London (WT 203148/Z/16/Z), the NIHR Clinical Research Facility (CRF) at Guy’s and St Thomas’ and by the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres based at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, and South London, Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. J.O. is supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (grant 206675/Z/17/Z). J.O. received support from the Medical Research Council Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London (grant MR/N026063/1). The project includes data from a programme of research funded by the NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme (RP-PG-0707-10154.)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell Macleod .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Macleod, R. et al. (2021). Detection of Injury and Automated Triage of Preterm Neonatal MRI Using Patch-Based Gaussian Processes. In: Sudre, C.H., et al. Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Perinatal Imaging, Placental and Preterm Image Analysis. UNSURE PIPPI 2021 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12959. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87735-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87735-4_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87734-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87735-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics